NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 15:39 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 15:39
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
   1   2   3   4   
Tags:
Difficulty: 555-605 Levelx   Modifiersx   Modifiersx               
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
B
gagan0303
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2020
Posts: 111
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 413
Location: India
Schools: Said '23 Judge '23
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   30 Jun 2021, 20:51
AjiteshArun wrote:
gagan0303 wrote:
Shouldn't there be a comma before who in A?

Gagan

Hi gagan0303,

We don't want a comma there, because that who is used to specify exactly which slaves the author is referring to.

1. ... setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property. ← This is like "He set free the slaves who were considered his property".

2. ... setting free the more than 500 slaves, who were legally considered his property. ← This is like "He set free the slaves".

Because the information introduced by this who is essential, we don't want to use a comma in between this who and the noun that it refers to.


Both the usage essentially look the same, can u elaborate further if there is any diff between the usage of ', who' and 'who'.

Gagan
User avatar
L
AjiteshArun
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5181
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [3]
Given Kudos: 631
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   01 Jul 2021, 22:45
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
gagan0303 wrote:
Both the usage essentially look the same, can u elaborate further if there is any diff between the usage of ', who' and 'who'.

Gagan

Hi gagan0303,

Absolutely.

1. Without a comma: restrictive ("essential") modifier

People who jump out of planes ← We're not looking at all people here. Only the ones who jump out of planes. Here we need the information introduced by who to understand exactly which people the author is referring to.

2. Without a comma: nonrestrictive ("nonessential") modifier

Archit, who is looking to take the GMAT in July... ← There is only one Archit in this context, and the author uses who to introduce some general information about Archit. We don't need this information to understand which Archit the author is referring to.
avatar
B
vishnugmatgupta
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Mar 2020
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   12 Dec 2021, 01:39
ugimba wrote:
In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

(A) setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(B) setting free more than the 500 slaves legally considered as
(D) and set free more than the 500 slaves who were legally considered


considered vs considered as : Although the usage of "considered as" is wrong here, it doesn't mean the usage of "considered as" is wrong in general. Consider the following examples!

Sentence #1: This job is considered a dream job.

Sentence #2: This job is considered as a dream job.

In this example, when two things are compared to be equal (this job == dream job), "as" is indeed not necessary. However, it would be wrong to state that "as" should be omitted after "consider" altogether, because it can be used in other contexts:

The tool A was used as a solution to the problem. We suggest tool B to be considered as another approach to solving the problem. Here the usage is correct.

Option D
One can argue that the verb set is parallel to stunned , and grammatically it is. Pay attention to overall structure of the sentence and the meaning it wants to convey. The RC III stunned his family by setting some slaves free. If we create a list of two different clauses as option D does, the connection and the flow of the sentence w.r.t what it wants to convey break. So this is the reason D is incorrect. Set could be parallel to stunned, but the meaning is not correct.
User avatar
S
VIGHNESHKAMATH
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2021
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [0]
Given Kudos: 259
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   01 Mar 2022, 02:33
daagh wrote:
Let’s take you have more than 500 flowers and you want to sell all of them. Then we say that you want to sell the more than 500 flowers.
In the second case, you have more than 600 or 700 flowers, but you want to sell only just more than 500 flowers, say 550 or so , retaining the others. In this case, we will say that you want to sell more than the 500 flowers.
In the given topic the in A before more stresses that he set free all his 500 and odd slaves, while D implies that he retained some. This is not the intended meaning. If he wanted emancipate slaves, why would ha have retained a few alone?



Please let me know the meaning of the below sentence. What does it convey?

''You want to sell more than 500 flowers''

I have eliminated article ''the'' altogether. What does it convey now?

Regards
Vighnesh
User avatar
L
ExpertsGlobal5
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [2]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   01 Mar 2022, 06:03
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
VIGHNESHKAMATH wrote:
daagh wrote:
Let’s take you have more than 500 flowers and you want to sell all of them. Then we say that you want to sell the more than 500 flowers.
In the second case, you have more than 600 or 700 flowers, but you want to sell only just more than 500 flowers, say 550 or so , retaining the others. In this case, we will say that you want to sell more than the 500 flowers.
In the given topic the in A before more stresses that he set free all his 500 and odd slaves, while D implies that he retained some. This is not the intended meaning. If he wanted emancipate slaves, why would ha have retained a few alone?



Please let me know the meaning of the below sentence. What does it convey?

''You want to sell more than 500 flowers''

I have eliminated article ''the'' altogether. What does it convey now?

Regards
Vighnesh


Hello VIGHNESHKAMATH,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, the sentence ''You want to sell more than 500 flowers.'' simply conveys that "You" want to sell upwards of 500 flowers.

By contrast, ''You want to sell the more than 500 flowers.'' conveys that "You: want to sell a particular set of more than 500 flowers.

Further, ''You want to sell more than the 500 flowers.'' conveys that "You" want to sell a particular set of 500 flowers and more flowers in addition to that set.

The use of "the" is used to convey specificity; when a noun is referred to with the article "the" it means that the sentence refers to a specific instance of the noun.

For example - "Soldiers are heroes." conveys that all soldiers are heroes.

"The soldiers are heroes." conveys that some specific soldiers are heroes.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
S
NarayanaGupta007
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2021
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [0]
Given Kudos: 51
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   23 May 2022, 07:18
ugimba wrote:
In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

(A) setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(B) setting free more than the 500 slaves legally considered as
(C) and set free more than 500 slaves, who were legally considered as
(D) and set free more than the 500 slaves who were legally considered
(E) and he set free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered as


Show Spoiler
https://www.nytimes.com/1991/07/29/us/slave-owner-s-1791-act-of-emancipation-endures.html

The setting was apt. The Northern Neck of Virginia, wedged between the Potomac and Rappahannock Rivers, is the birthplace of a number of Americans identified with the concept of liberty. George Washington was born a few miles from here, as were James Madison and James Monroe.

But unlike Robert Carter 3d, the wealthy planter who was honored near here tonight, none of those familiar figures felt compelled to extend freedom to the dark-skinned people who were their slaves. 'Ahead of His Time'

"He was a man ahead of his time," said Nancy Carter Crump, a distant relative of Carter.

Two hundred years ago, Carter, one of the wealthiest men in Virginia who owned 60,000 acres on 18 plantations stunned his family, friends and neighbors by filing what was called a deed of emancipation, or manumission, setting free the more than 500 "negroes & mulatto slaves" who were his "absolute property."


I took 8 Seconds
Considered as is wrong idiom so B C & E out
and D dont have anything parallel so its A
moreover the last clause is part of emancipation so cant use and
User avatar
S
VIGHNESHKAMATH
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2021
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [0]
Given Kudos: 259
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   05 Jun 2022, 21:30
daagh wrote:
Let’s take you have more than 500 flowers and you want to sell all of them. Then we say that you want to sell the more than 500 flowers.
In the second case, you have more than 600 or 700 flowers, but you want to sell only just more than 500 flowers, say 550 or so , retaining the others. In this case, we will say that you want to sell more than the 500 flowers.
In the given topic the in A before more stresses that he set free all his 500 and odd slaves, while D implies that he retained some. This is not the intended meaning. If he wanted emancipate slaves, why would ha have retained a few alone?



In your example, instead of saying ''More than the 500 flowers'' if I say ''more than 500 flowers'', is there any difference in meaning?

Thank You
Vighnesh
User avatar
S
VIGHNESHKAMATH
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2021
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [0]
Given Kudos: 259
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   05 Jun 2022, 21:31
daagh wrote:
Let’s take you have more than 500 flowers and you want to sell all of them. Then we say that you want to sell the more than 500 flowers.
In the second case, you have more than 600 or 700 flowers, but you want to sell only just more than 500 flowers, say 550 or so , retaining the others. In this case, we will say that you want to sell more than the 500 flowers.
In the given topic the in A before more stresses that he set free all his 500 and odd slaves, while D implies that he retained some. This is not the intended meaning. If he wanted emancipate slaves, why would ha have retained a few alone?



In your example, instead of saying ''More than the 500 flowers'' if I say ''more than 500 flowers'', is there any difference in meaning?

Thank You
Vighnesh
avatar
B
ArpanKanjilal
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Apr 2022
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   06 Jun 2022, 00:09
I went with A because "considered as" is wrong most of the time in GMAT.
User avatar
L
ExpertsGlobal5
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   06 Jun 2022, 04:34
Expert Reply
ArpanKanjilal wrote:
I went with A because "considered as" is wrong most of the time in GMAT.


Hello ArpanKanjilal,

We hope this finds you well.

To provide a bit of clarity here, "considered as" is always wrong on the GMAT; "considered" is always used without any type of helping words or phrases, such as "to be" or "as".

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
L
ExpertsGlobal5
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   06 Jun 2022, 04:42
Expert Reply
VIGHNESHKAMATH wrote:
daagh wrote:
Let’s take you have more than 500 flowers and you want to sell all of them. Then we say that you want to sell the more than 500 flowers.
In the second case, you have more than 600 or 700 flowers, but you want to sell only just more than 500 flowers, say 550 or so , retaining the others. In this case, we will say that you want to sell more than the 500 flowers.
In the given topic the in A before more stresses that he set free all his 500 and odd slaves, while D implies that he retained some. This is not the intended meaning. If he wanted emancipate slaves, why would ha have retained a few alone?



In your example, instead of saying ''More than the 500 flowers'' if I say ''more than 500 flowers'', is there any difference in meaning?

Thank You
Vighnesh


Hello VIGHNESHKAMATH,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, there is a slight difference in meaning between these two phrases:

''I want to sell more than the 500 flowers'.' - this sentence means I want to sell a specific set of 500 flowers and more flowers in addition to that set.

"I want to sell more than 500 flowers." - this sentence simply means I want to sell in excess of 500 flowers.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
S
harshittahuja
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Apr 2022
Posts: 81
Own Kudos [?]: 49 [0]
Given Kudos: 165
Location: India
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   06 Jun 2022, 05:19
My way to solve this is eliminate B,C,E as Considered dont take any preposition with it
and Between A and D I choose A due to parllelism
User avatar
B
Tanchat
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Posts: 233
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 139
Send PM
In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   24 Jun 2022, 09:29
Dear Experts, GMATNinja AndrewN mikemcgarry

I saw many people asked about A&B. Can anyone elaborate why (D) is wrong?

If (A) is correct : setting free ..... should modify "Robert Carter III stunned his family" right? the non-underlined part already have "by filling a deed of emancipation" Thus, "setting free the more than.." is another action and must be parallel with filling. Therefore, there should be "and".

In 1791 Robert Carter III, ....... , stunned his family, friends and neighbors by filling a deed of emancipation "and" setting free the more than 500 slaes who were legally considered


Then, why (A) is correct and (D) wrong?
User avatar
G
ReedArnoldMPREP
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Posts: 521
Own Kudos [?]: 486 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   24 Jun 2022, 09:50
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Tanchat wrote:
Dear Experts, GMATNinja AndrewN mikemcgarry

I saw many people asked about A&B. Can anyone elaborate why (D) is wrong?

If (A) is correct : setting free ..... should modify "Robert Carter III stunned his family" right? the non-underlined part already have "by filling a deed of emancipation" Thus, "setting free the more than.." is another action and must be parallel with filling. Therefore, there should be "and".

In 1791 Robert Carter III, ....... , stunned his family, friends and neighbors by filling a deed of emancipation "and" setting free the more than 500 slaes who were legally considered


Then, why (A) is correct and (D) wrong?


I would argue that 'setting free the more than 500 slaves' is actually modifying 'by filing a deed of emancipation.'

Comma,--ing modifiers usually describe 'subj-verb' clauses. However, they are technically an *adverb*, and adverbs can also describe *other modifiers.* So I think this is an example where the adverb 'setting free...' is describing the *other* adverb 'by filing a deed of emancipation.'

If you build parallel structure, it makes it unclear that the 'deed of emancipation' is HOW he freed the slaves. With that structure, those are TWO things he did that surprised his family. He surprised his family by FILING A DEED...and [by] SETTING HIS SLAVES FREE. But that's actually just one single action.

D is wrong for similar reasons. He did two things: stunned his family, and set free his slaves. But it isn't clear in the structure that what stunned his family WAS the fact that he freed his slaves.
avatar
L
AndrewN
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6859 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   25 Jun 2022, 11:55
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Tanchat wrote:
Dear Experts, GMATNinja AndrewN mikemcgarry

I saw many people asked about A&B. Can anyone elaborate why (D) is wrong?

If (A) is correct : setting free ..... should modify "Robert Carter III stunned his family" right? the non-underlined part already have "by filling a deed of emancipation" Thus, "setting free the more than.." is another action and must be parallel with filling. Therefore, there should be "and".

In 1791 Robert Carter III, ....... , stunned his family, friends and neighbors by filling a deed of emancipation "and" setting free the more than 500 slaes who were legally considered


Then, why (A) is correct and (D) wrong?

Hello, Tanchat. I agree with the response provided above. I will add that, in my view, the placement of the comparative more than leads to a completely different meaning. Ignore the other elements of answer choices (A) and (D) to focus on this point for a moment.

(A) the more than 500 slaves = there were more than 500 slaves
(D) more than the 500 slaves = something in addition to a group of 500 slaves

If I write, The boy traded more than the 500 baseball cards in his collection, I find myself wondering the following:

  • Did the boy previously own trading cards that pertained to other sports? (e.g., football, basketball, hockey)
  • Did the boy trade his binder of cards, or plastic sheets or cases to hold cards, or other trading-card-related items?
  • Did the boy trade video games or something else a boy might possess in addition to those baseball cards?

I cannot ignore such thoughts, since the placement of the comparative more than forces me to make such associations. Getting back to the original sentence, at best, (D) makes me wonder why the sentence does not specify what else Robert Carter III may have set free: horses? cattle? sheep? I am not making a joke about slavery in any way, but the frame leaves much to be desired in the way of clarity:

set/setting free more than the _____ who were legally considered his property

This one is a lost cause, and we can abandon (D) on this consideration alone.

Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
B
s3fushah
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Oct 2021
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 501
Location: Germany
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   02 Jul 2022, 04:15
hello all, my question is that isn't the first part of the sentence an independent clause and must be followed by, in that case, an and? It seems that isn't the case, can somebody pls elaborate. Thx
User avatar
S
armaankumar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2020
Posts: 103
Own Kudos [?]: 57 [1]
Given Kudos: 104
Location: India
Schools: ESSEC ESCP Europe (A) HEC MiM "25 (D)
GMAT 1: 610 Q41 V33 (Online)
GMAT 2: 650 Q47 V33 (Online)
GPA: 3.4
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   02 Jul 2022, 05:16
1
Bookmarks
In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

(A) setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(B) setting free more than the 500 slaves legally considered as
Use of "the" doesn't make sense. We want to talk about a number, not a particular of group of 500 slaves.

(C) and set free more than 500 slaves, who were legally considered as
"Robert Carter III stunned"
"Robert Carter III set free"
The parallelism is fine

The usage of the comma makes the clause following 500 slaves non restrictive.

The use of "as" is not correct

(D) and set free more than the 500 slaves who were legally considered
"Robert Carter III stunned"
"Robert Carter III set free"
The parallelism is fine

Use of "the" doesn't make sense. We want to talk about a number, not a particular of group of 500 slaves.

(E) and he set free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered as
"Robert Carter III stunned"
"Robert Carter III he set free"
Parallelism is incorrect.

The use of "as" is not correct
User avatar
L
AjiteshArun
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 5181
Own Kudos [?]: 4653 [0]
Given Kudos: 631
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   02 Jul 2022, 19:58
Expert Reply
s3fushah wrote:
hello all, my question is that isn't the first part of the sentence an independent clause and must be followed by, in that case, an and? It seems that isn't the case, can somebody pls elaborate. Thx

Hi s3fushah,

Are you thinking about attaching a second independent clause to an existing independent clause? That's something we can do, but it's not something that we have to do. We can attach one or more modifiers to an independent clause, and that's what we see in the correct option.

1. ... Robert Carter III... stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation, setting free the...
User avatar
L
GmatKnightTutor
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Posts: 4414
Own Kudos [?]: 1304 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Re: In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   03 Jul 2022, 00:13
1
Kudos
s3fushah wrote:
hello all, my question is that isn't the first part of the sentence an independent clause and must be followed by, in that case, an and? It seems that isn't the case, can somebody pls elaborate. Thx


In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation

You are correct in the sense that this part can stand as a sentence by itself. Does that REQUIRE the following part to begin with an AND - not necessarily.
User avatar
G
GMATking94
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2022
Status:Do or Die
Posts: 180
Own Kudos [?]: 67 [0]
Given Kudos: 125
Location: India
Schools: IIMB '25 (A) IIMC '25 (A) IIMA '25 (D) ISB '25 (I)
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Operations (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink] New post   16 Feb 2023, 09:12
ugimba wrote:
In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in Virginia, stunned his family, friends, and neighbors by filing a deed of emancipation, setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered his property.

(A) setting free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered
(B) setting free more than the 500 slaves legally considered as
(C) and set free more than 500 slaves, who were legally considered as
(D) and set free more than the 500 slaves who were legally considered
(E) and he set free the more than 500 slaves who were legally considered as



Hi Experts GMATNinja KarishmaB mgmat egmat

My take on this question why (D) though it is parallel is wrong and (A) is correct. I think the main reason is that one event is dependent on the other and not independent stand alone events. Please suggest if my take is correct..

I chose (D) being a big fan of parallelism.

Thanks.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
In 1791 Robert Carter III, one of the wealthiest plantation owners in [#permalink]
16 Feb 2023, 09:12
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions