In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 01 Mar 2017, 09:53

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 911
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 625 [0], given: 44

Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Dec 2011, 02:25
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
D is more correct tense. Clause with although will go with "would take", another go with "was". "had been" is wrong tense and change the chronological sentences.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

GMAT Pill Representative
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2050
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 389

Kudos [?]: 1355 [0], given: 8

Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Mar 2012, 13:54
As referenced on this post: http://www.gmatpill.com/practice-questi ... orrection/

"Would take" = the period from 1860 to 60 years from that - so that would be 1860 looking forward til 1920ish

You would only use "took" if you were from the perspective of some future date (like today's present) and you looked back at 1860 and say that it took 60 years. But in that case, you would have to differentiate the distinct time of the "birthing" of the book and use "had been born". You need to do this to show which of the 2 past events happened first. The dictionary was born first, and then it as completed. So "it had been born"..and then "it was completed" is what we want.

So you have two options:
(1) would take......was born
"would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was

or

""took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary has been born"
Hope that helps.
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 181
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 20

Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Mar 2012, 16:10
Nice question and nice explanation guys....
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 328
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 23

Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 May 2014, 18:07
GMATPill wrote:
As referenced on this post: http://www.gmatpill.com/practice-questi ... orrection/

"Would take" = the period from 1860 to 60 years from that - so that would be 1860 looking forward til 1920ish

You would only use "took" if you were from the perspective of some future date (like today's present) and you looked back at 1860 and say that it took 60 years. But in that case, you would have to differentiate the distinct time of the "birthing" of the book and use "had been born". You need to do this to show which of the 2 past events happened first. The dictionary was born first, and then it as completed. So "it had been born"..and then "it was completed" is what we want.

So you have two options:
(1) would take......was born
"would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was

or

""took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary has been born"
Hope that helps.

Hi GMATpill -- not sure if there a typo in the second point and still a little blurry still on this top

1) How does "would take" and "was" differentiate time. Isn't "would take" implying a future event from 1860? If so, is "was" implying a "past" event? Isn't the book physically born AFTER it starts and not before?

2) If I look at it from present. I would have to say that it took 60 years, the ...HAD been born. Are we referring to the book being born AFTER it was completed or are we saying that it was born(thought about) before it started. I'm assuming the latter and that's why using "HAD".

On the other hand, if we are implying that the book was born after the 60 years(not conceptually, but physically), then we would say, it took and it was born. Correct? Why would we use "has been born" over simple present?

Thanks!
Current Student
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 939
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 136

Kudos [?]: 875 [0], given: 546

Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Jan 2015, 09:41
In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to create a dictionary more comprehensive than the world had ever seen; although the project would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been born.

• would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been -> This is the last event and cannot have past perfect tense.
• took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
• would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was being -> being is used to indicate an action which is happening as we speak.
• would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
• took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was about to be -> Too verbose and clearly too much of words.

B) took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
Both past tense -> implies both the action occurred at the same time. Which is not logical.

D) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
From the past point of view, "would take" make sense and "was" make sense as we are talking about an action which happened in the past.
Would implies a possible event from past time frame

D) is correct.
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
Prodigy for Tepper - CMU : http://bit.ly/cmuloan-kd

Intern
Joined: 25 Jan 2013
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 9

Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Nov 2015, 12:54
In the last sentence, there are two events: 1) project would take....and 2) dictionary born. So ideally, birth of a dictionary would happen earlier than its completion, and therefore the second event must be in simple past (as this is the only past event between 2 events; Event 1 is a prediction about something)

As far as B is concerned, it was a trap answer, as it sounds good to ear, but doesn't take into account the sequence of events. Philological society "launched"(simple Past) efforts....now the project if mentioned as "took 10 years"(simple Past), it implies that launching of effort and completion of project both happened simultaneously in the past -- which is Not true! The timeline of the project completion is a "prediction" of future, so cannot be took, and should use conditional "would take"

Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 39
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 27

Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Jan 2016, 23:47
Fistail wrote:
In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to create a dictionary more comprehensive than the world had ever seen; although the project would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been born.

A. would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been
B. took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
C. would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was being
D. would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
E. took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was about to be

Thank you,
Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2016
Posts: 81
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 163

Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Aug 2016, 00:57
i read all the replies and still didn't get the answer. i feel B is better choice. what i got from the sentence is that 'in 1860 a project was started which took more than 60 years for the completion but at the end, a dictionary was born.'
Now why do we have to assume that we are in 1860 frame and the project has not completed yet. and even if that is the case, the ending phrase should have been "dictionary will b born" rather than "was born". Please help
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2013
Posts: 151
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 313

Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Oct 2016, 16:51
What is chronology here?

World had ever seen-------> launched (1860)------ > took-----------> born
World had ever seen-------> launched (1860)-----------> born------ > took

What am I missing?
_________________

We Shall Overcome... One day...

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7198
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2179

Kudos [?]: 14068 [2] , given: 222

Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Oct 2016, 03:57
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
nahid78 wrote:
What is chronology here?

World had ever seen-------> launched (1860)------ > took-----------> born
World had ever seen-------> launched (1860)-----------> born------ > took

What am I missing?

The correct sentence -->

In 1860, the Philological Society launched (in 1860) its effort to create a dictionary more comprehensive than the world had ever seen (before 1860); although the project would take more than 60 years (60 years starting from 1860) to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was born (in 1860).

"would take" is the past future - when we talk about the past and in that we refer to the future
We are talking about the past (1860) and at that time, we are talking about 60 years in the future.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Chat Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 242
GPA: 4
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 84

Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Oct 2016, 15:19
When we want to denote future in an event which has already occurred i.e in past tense, use conditional would

Past --- Future --> Would

Present -- Future --> will

C is out because of being and A used had been born - for an event which occurred last in the sequence.

Hence C
Re: In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to   [#permalink] 13 Oct 2016, 15:19

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 31 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to 5 01 Jun 2008, 18:50
2 In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to 6 11 Feb 2008, 06:48
In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to 7 15 Dec 2007, 12:42
In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to 4 25 Jun 2007, 19:46
In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to 5 14 Apr 2007, 06:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by