In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 Feb 2017, 04:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2009
Posts: 56
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 1

In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2009, 04:08
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

78% (02:06) correct 22% (01:32) wrong based on 282 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and ruling that it was a form of price fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.

a) the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and
b) the supreme court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia, and
c) the supreme court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia,
d) a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the supreme court
e) when the supreme declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional,

If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Posts: 84
Location: United States
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 13

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2013, 23:27
sakshiag28 wrote:
In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and ruling that it was a form of price fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.

a) the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and
b) the supreme court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia, and
c) the supreme court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia,
d) a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the supreme court
e) when the supreme declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional,

I will answer by eliminating the options.

a) , and- What it is used for. To connect two clauses. Now if you look at what follows ,and is "ruling" which an indication that ,+ing form is required to show outcome of certain action.
b) eliminate for the same reason.
c) Correct
d) passive construction
e) the modifier when conveys that when supreme court declared a minimum wage something else also happened which is not the intended meaning.
Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 898
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 1086 [0], given: 543

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2013, 00:03
Can someone provide a detailed analysis for this question. Thanks!
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 842
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 1313 [1] , given: 197

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2013, 00:33
1
KUDOS
fozzzy wrote:
Can someone provide a detailed analysis for this question. Thanks!

In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and ruling that it was a form of price fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.

IF YOU READ THIS clearly you can see that ==>meaning coming out to be ==>SUPREME COURT DECLARED A MINIMUM WAGE....which is wrong as per the meaning ...actual context is that supreme court declared this wage as unconstitutional.
hence there is a modfier placement error. hence A .WRONG
MOREOVER placement of AND after comma makes complete independent clause but in actual context it is describing the previous clause.

a) the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and
WRONG
b) the supreme court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia, and
MEANING IS AWKWARD: AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL supreme court declared a minimum wage.....so WRONG
use OF AND is wrong
c) the supreme court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia,
CORRECT.
d) a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the supreme court
WRONG
PASSIVE VOICE.
ruling AFTER commma is modifying minimum wage hence wrong.
e) when the supreme declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional,
WRONG
this is FRAGMENT As the sentence doesnt seems to be complete.
moreover there is a modifier error same as A

hope it helps
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...

learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment

Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 898
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 1086 [0], given: 543

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2013, 01:34
In the non-underlined portion "it" refers to minimum wage?
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

Director
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 623
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 32

Kudos [?]: 221 [0], given: 9

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2013, 10:37
Whenever you spot an and, please make sure the structure following the and is grammatically similar with something preceding the and (for the simple reason that and joins two or more entities).

In A, and B, the structure following the and is: (and) ruling that it was a form of price fixing
But there is nothing preceding the and that is grammatically similar to this structure.

So, A and B would have been better if the non-underlined portion had: ..and ruled.. (and not ..and ruling..), because in that case the portions before and after and would have been grammatically similar: ...the supreme court declared...and ruled...

Reiterating, the structure in A and B: ...the supreme court declared...and ruling... is not a grammatically parallel structure.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish (GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle)
http://www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3850
Followers: 1330

Kudos [?]: 6118 [2] , given: 71

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Feb 2014, 15:54
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
sakshiag28 wrote:
In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and ruling that it was a form of price fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.

A) the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and
B) the supreme court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia, and
C) the supreme court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia,
D) a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the supreme court
E) when the supreme declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional,

kinjiGC wrote:
Hi Mike,
Can you please explain this OG
Thanks, Kinjal

Dear Kinjal,
I'm happy to respond. Here's my analysis.

Split #1: the idiom for "declare." The word declare idiomatically does not take a preposition --- the correct idiom is simply "to declare X Y", where X is some noun and Y is some judgement.
... to declare the assailant guilty ...
... to declare the new discovery invalid ...
... to declare the soup delicious ...

There is no preposition between the noun and the judgement. Putting the preposition "as" into this structure is incorrect:
... to declare the assailant as guilty ...
Every answer choice with the word "as" before the word "unconstitutional" makes this same mistake. On the basis of this split, we immediately can eliminate choices (A), (B), and (E). (Each one of those also has other problems!!)

After one split, we are down to only two choices. Choices (C) & (D) are both grammatically and idiomatically correct. The profound difference is in Rhetorical Construction. For more on that, see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/rhetorical ... orrection/
Choice (C) is strong, direct, sleek, and powerful. Choice (D) is passive, indirect, flaccid, and mealy-mouthed. The choice between them is stark. Choice (C) is much better, and is clearly the best answer.

Notice that the modifying phrase beginning with the word "ruling" is a verb modifier, a.k.a. an adverbial phrase. Unlike noun modifiers, these are not subject to the Touch Rule, so we don't have to contort the first half of the sentence into a grammatical pretzel just so that the words "supreme court" are touching that modifier. For more on the Touch Rule, see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/modifiers- ... orrection/

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 328
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 23

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2014, 11:11
mikemcgarry wrote:
sakshiag28 wrote:
In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and ruling that it was a form of price fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.

A) the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and
B) the supreme court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia, and
C) the supreme court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia,
D) a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the supreme court
E) when the supreme declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional,

kinjiGC wrote:
Hi Mike,
Can you please explain this OG
Thanks, Kinjal

Dear Kinjal,
I'm happy to respond. Here's my analysis.

Split #1: the idiom for "declare." The word declare idiomatically does not take a preposition --- the correct idiom is simply "to declare X Y", where X is some noun and Y is some judgement.
... to declare the assailant guilty ...
... to declare the new discovery invalid ...
... to declare the soup delicious ...

There is no preposition between the noun and the judgement. Putting the preposition "as" into this structure is incorrect:
... to declare the assailant as guilty ...
Every answer choice with the word "as" before the word "unconstitutional" makes this same mistake. On the basis of this split, we immediately can eliminate choices (A), (B), and (E). (Each one of those also has other problems!!)

After one split, we are down to only two choices. Choices (C) & (D) are both grammatically and idiomatically correct. The profound difference is in Rhetorical Construction. For more on that, see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/rhetorical ... orrection/
Choice (C) is strong, direct, sleek, and powerful. Choice (D) is passive, indirect, flaccid, and mealy-mouthed. The choice between them is stark. Choice (C) is much better, and is clearly the best answer.

Notice that the modifying phrase beginning with the word "ruling" is a verb modifier, a.k.a. an adverbial phrase. Unlike noun modifiers, these are not subject to the Touch Rule, so we don't have to contort the first half of the sentence into a grammatical pretzel just so that the words "supreme court" are touching that modifier. For more on the Touch Rule, see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/modifiers- ... orrection/

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Hi Mike,

In answer choice C, isn't it idiomatically incorrect? Declared a X(minimum wage) as Y(unconstitutional)?

thanks
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3850
Followers: 1330

Kudos [?]: 6118 [0], given: 71

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2014, 14:35
russ9 wrote:
Hi Mike,

In answer choice C, isn't it idiomatically incorrect? Declared a X(minimum wage) as Y(unconstitutional)?

thanks

Dear russ9
With all due respect, I don't believe the word "as" even appears in choice (C).

You are perfectly correct that declare X as Y would be idiomatically incorrect.

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 291
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 46

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2014, 22:54
mikemcgarry wrote:
sakshiag28 wrote:
In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and ruling that it was a form of price fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.

A) the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional, and
B) the supreme court declared as unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia, and
C) the supreme court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia,
D) a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia was declared unconstitutional by the supreme court
E) when the supreme declared a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia as unconstitutional,

kinjiGC wrote:
Hi Mike,
Can you please explain this OG
Thanks, Kinjal

Dear Kinjal,
I'm happy to respond. Here's my analysis.

Split #1: the idiom for "declare." The word declare idiomatically does not take a preposition --- the correct idiom is simply "to declare X Y", where X is some noun and Y is some judgement.
... to declare the assailant guilty ...
... to declare the new discovery invalid ...
... to declare the soup delicious ...

There is no preposition between the noun and the judgement. Putting the preposition "as" into this structure is incorrect:
... to declare the assailant as guilty ...
Every answer choice with the word "as" before the word "unconstitutional" makes this same mistake. On the basis of this split, we immediately can eliminate choices (A), (B), and (E). (Each one of those also has other problems!!)

After one split, we are down to only two choices. Choices (C) & (D) are both grammatically and idiomatically correct. The profound difference is in Rhetorical Construction. For more on that, see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/rhetorical ... orrection/
Choice (C) is strong, direct, sleek, and powerful. Choice (D) is passive, indirect, flaccid, and mealy-mouthed. The choice between them is stark. Choice (C) is much better, and is clearly the best answer.

Notice that the modifying phrase beginning with the word "ruling" is a verb modifier, a.k.a. an adverbial phrase. Unlike noun modifiers, these are not subject to the Touch Rule, so we don't have to contort the first half of the sentence into a grammatical pretzel just so that the words "supreme court" are touching that modifier. For more on the Touch Rule, see:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/modifiers- ... orrection/

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Hi Mike as always your explanation are crisp. Out of curiosity , which verb is the above highlighted verb modifier referring to ?
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3850
Followers: 1330

Kudos [?]: 6118 [0], given: 71

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2014, 10:41
himanshujovi wrote:
Hi Mike as always your explanation are crisp. Out of curiosity , which verb is the above highlighted verb modifier referring to ?

Dear himanshujovi,
Thank you for your kind words. I'm happy to respond.

Here's the OA version:
In 1923, the supreme court declared unconstitutional a minimum wage for women and children in the district of Columbia, ruling that it was a form of price fixing and, as such, an abridgment of the right of contract.
The participle "ruling" is a verb-modifier, or one might say a "clause modifier" --- there's actually not a sharp distinction between a verb modifier and a clause modifier. It provides the content of the court's decision, the effect of their action. This is typical for a verb modifier.
I told Kevin he was very smart, making him feel good about himself.
The bond market fell precipitously, sending stocks into a panic.
At Austerlitz, Napoleon crushed the Third Coalition, bringing an end to the Holy Roman Empire.
In each one, the first part, in green, is an independent clause, and the second part, in purple, is a verb-modifier giving the effect of the action, the result.

Does this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 129
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 24

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2014, 02:16
Hi Mike,

The idiom "Declared A B" is equivalent to "Consider A B", isn't it? Are there any other words that run along the same lines?
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3850
Followers: 1330

Kudos [?]: 6118 [0], given: 71

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2014, 14:51
pretzel wrote:
Hi Mike,

The idiom "Declared A B" is equivalent to "Consider A B", isn't it? Are there any other words that run along the same lines?

Dear pretzel,
I'm happy to respond. In terms of common words, likely to appear on the GMAT, there are no other words in this pattern. BTW, here are some free GMAT Idiom Flashcards:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/flashcards/idioms
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10635
Followers: 940

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2015, 10:31
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In 1923, the supreme court declared a minimum wage for women   [#permalink] 11 Dec 2015, 10:31
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that 11 07 May 2014, 18:28
26 Although women’s wages are improving 16 13 Nov 2013, 18:38
42 In 1923, the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage for women 17 13 Jun 2011, 20:38
1 The Supreme Courts concern with legitimacy is not for the 2 25 Dec 2008, 04:55
The Supreme Courts concern with legitimacy is not for the 17 19 Apr 2007, 21:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by