It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 07:18

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10185

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Dec 2015, 10:55
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 3106

Kudos [?]: 1145 [0], given: 327

Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Dec 2015, 11:37
enigma123 wrote:
In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, although there was an increase in instances of “coping” behavior—such as submissive gestures and avoidance of dominant individuals—attacks did not become any more frequent. Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey,crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.


( in 1960s ) Rats - Crowding increases number of attacks
( Recent Experiments ) Rhesus monkeys - Coping behaviour , frequency of attacks did not increase.

Any species of monkey , crowding increases aggression.



The flow of information is from the Premises ( Rats and Rhesus monkeys ) monkeys to the Conclusion ( Any species of monkey )


Attachment:
Untitled.png
Untitled.png [ 3.59 KiB | Viewed 2829 times ]


If we apply the concept of pre thinking the first thing which must strike us is that " There must be some behavorial characteristics of the animals under consideration "

C leads to the same -

Rhesus monkeys respond with aggression to a wider range of stimuli than any other monkeys do.

So, Rhesus monkeys also respond with aggression but under a different stimuli ( might be for food or any other issue ) and adopt the coping behaviour under stimulus such as " crowded conditions "


So, we can come to the conclusion that " It is not likely that, for any species of monkey,crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats."
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Kudos [?]: 1145 [0], given: 327

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2015, 00:49
Premise: Rat in crowded – rise attacks among them. But Rhesus monkey in crowed – attacks no increase.
Conclusion: Not all monkey increases aggression in crowded like rat.
Choice A and B weaken the argument. Choice E is irrelevant. Choice D, “some individual monkeys” do not impact on the argument (species).
Choice C: Rhesus monkeys react to aggression from low number of attacks to high number of attacks. It strengthens the conclusion Not all monkey increases aggression in crowded.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2015
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 433

Concentration: Technology, Leadership
Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2016, 10:38
Gnpth or enigma123, could you please edit the question and delete the part that gives a hint about the OA?

"How come the answer is C? Can someone please explain the reasoning?"

enigma123 wrote:
In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, although there was an increase in instances of “coping” behavior—such as submissive gestures and avoidance of dominant individuals—attacks did not become any more frequent. Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey,
crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions.
B. In the studies of rats, nondominant individuals were found to increasingly avoid dominant individuals when the animals were in crowded conditions.
C. Rhesus monkeys respond with aggression to a wider range of stimuli than any other monkeys do.
D. Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in significantly more attacks than the other monkeys were.
E. Some of the coping behavior displayed by rhesus monkeys is similar to behavior rhesus monkeys use to bring to an end an attack that has begun.

How come the answer is C? Can someone please explain the reasoning?

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 433

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 12 Feb 2014
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 11

Location: India
Schools: LBS MIF '19
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.3
Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2016, 11:05
I dont get how C is the answer... The conclusion here is about increase in aggression due to crowding as compared to that of rats.. Other species of monkeys may not respond aggressively to a wider range of stimuli but they could still respond quite aggressively to overcrowding, probably as aggressively as a rat does..

Please let me know where I am going wrong..

Thanks in advance.. :)

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 11

SVP
SVP
User avatar
B
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1903

Kudos [?]: 549 [0], given: 23

In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2016, 19:14
rs47 wrote:
I dont get how C is the answer... The conclusion here is about increase in aggression due to crowding as compared to that of rats.. Other species of monkeys may not respond aggressively to a wider range of stimuli but they could still respond quite aggressively to overcrowding, probably as aggressively as a rat does..

Please let me know where I am going wrong..

Thanks in advance.. :)


Hi rs47,

Let me clarify your doubt here:

Desired flow of thoughts
1. We know that Rhesus monkeys do not act aggressively as the the rats do.
2. Rhesus monkeys are the most aggressive in nature (this is what option C says)
3. Rhesus monkeys do not become aggressive in over crowded conditions


4. Sine Rhesus monkeys who are the most aggressive of all the monkey species, we can say that other species will also not beome aggresive.
(The final conclusion including the correct assumption)

Does this help?

Last edited by OptimusPrepJanielle on 12 Mar 2016, 23:50, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 549 [0], given: 23

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 12 Feb 2014
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 11

Location: India
Schools: LBS MIF '19
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.3
Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2016, 22:20
Hi OptimusPrepJanielle, thanks a lot for the response.. Just a small query, how did you arrive at the following premise?

"2. Rhesus monkeys are the most aggressive in nature"

Thanks in advance..

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 11

1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
B
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1903

Kudos [?]: 549 [1], given: 23

Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2016, 23:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
rs47 wrote:
Hi OptimusPrepJanielle, thanks a lot for the response.. Just a small query, how did you arrive at the following premise?

"2. Rhesus monkeys are the most aggressive in nature"

Thanks in advance..


Hi rs47,

I think my language made you misunderstand my response. Sorry for that.
The points 1 2 and 3 are the flow of thoughts (taking into account the option C) which I have written before hand and then 4th point restates the assumption.

Kudos [?]: 549 [1], given: 23

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10185

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Mar 2016, 15:23
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2015
Posts: 110

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 136

Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2016, 14:57
can a moderator go in and edit the question so that the answer is concealed? defeats the whole point of doing the question

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 136

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 645

Kudos [?]: 389 [1], given: 36

GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2016, 07:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
eyunni wrote:
In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks
among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys
were placed in crowded conditions, although there was an increase in instances of
“coping” behavior—such as submissive gestures and avoidance of dominant
individuals—attacks did not become any more frequent. Therefore it is not likely that,
for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in
rats.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions.

B. In the studies of rats, nondominant individuals were found to increasingly avoid dominant individuals when the animals were in crowded conditions.

C. Rhesus monkeys respond with aggression to a wider range of stimuli than any other monkeys do.

D. Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in significantly more attacks than the other monkeys were.

E. Some of the coping behavior displayed by rhesus monkeys is similar to behavior rhesus monkeys use to bring to an end an attack that has begun.

Please explain your answers.


C is the correct answer.

Amongst all types of monkeys rhesus monkey respond aggressively to a wide range of things. Now it means they get angry often and get angry on a lots of things. They are the angriest of all monkeys. Now if the angriest of all (these rhesus) did not responded aggressively to crowding, the other varieties of monkeys which are comparatively more milder and gentler then rhesus will not also respond to the crowding.

An analogy will be IF a gladiator someone can fight with a ferocious tiger without any fear then it is logical to think that he would NOT be afraid to fight with a goat. Similarly if over crowding is not making rhesus (who gets violent easily) aggressive, then other monkeys might not get aggressive either .
_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Kudos [?]: 389 [1], given: 36

Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 812

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 32

Premium Member
Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2017, 10:27
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 32

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Jul 2017
Posts: 46

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 33

Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2017, 09:03
I got a modified version of the question in GMATPrep EP2. Please have a look at the below question:

In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, it was not such attacks that increased significantly,but rather instances of “coping” behavior, such as submissive gestures, avoidance of dominant individuals and huddling with relatives. Therefore the evidence from rhesus monkeys makes it doubtful that crowding significantly increases aggressive impulses in primates.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. The rhesus monkey is the species of monkey that is most prone to fighting.
B. Coping behavior was adopted by the crowded monkeys to forestall acts of aggression among them.
C. All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions.
D. Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in significantly more attacks than the other monkeys were.
E. Some of the rhesus monkeys in the experiments were subjected to levels of crowding that are unlikely to occur in natural circumstances.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


Experts please advise. :-)

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 33

Re: In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding   [#permalink] 04 Oct 2017, 09:03

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 53 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 1960 s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.