Argument Analysis: A underwent R(reduction) relative to world’s strongest currencies
1982, R = sig. Inc. in A EXPORT level
1987, similar R = inc. in EXPORT
NEED to increase EXPORT again, FM, is proposing another R
So following this logic, if FM reduced the value of the argon again, Argonia should see an increase in export level, but the question is asking what answer choice most STRONGLY supports that this reduction WILL NOT result in an increase in EXPORT
*Find a WEAKEN and (?) discrepancy problem * Answer Choice Analysis: The value of the argon rose sharply last year against the world's strongest currencies.
If it did rise sharply, doesn’t this mean that they could reduce the Argon to increase the export? But does this support why it will not increase in the export?
I don’t think so
In 1988 the argon lost a small amount of its value, and Argonian exports rose slightly in 1989.
Argon lost a small amount of its value, AND the export rose so this does the OPPOSITES of what the argument is looking for
Eliminate
The value of Argonia's exports was lower last year than it was the year before.
If they are seeing a reduction in exports, what guarantees them that reducing the Argon FURTHER will increase the export
Maybe, reducing the export will backfire again and this will FURTHER LOWER their export level which does predict that FM’s plan will NOT result in a sig inc. in Argonia’s export this year
BUT it is not guaranteed that lower export last year will continue, it could have an opposite effect and Argonia could see an increase in the export level
All of Argonia's export products are made by factories that were operating at full capacity last year, and new factories would take years to build.
IF all the factories ARE operating at full capacity, then even with the reduction, perhaps Argonia is not able to meet the export level
So, then this COULD support why the reduction in the value of the argon would not increase in Argonia’s export next year
Reductions in the value of the argon have almost always led to significant reductions in the amount of goods and services that Argonians purchase from abroad.
This is irrelevant and out of scope