It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 12:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 139

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2005, 14:51
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.

Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?

(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.

(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.

(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.

(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.

(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.

Last edited by cybera on 19 Jul 2005, 17:51, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 666

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2005, 19:31
B....

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 848

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2005, 19:43
I will go with D.
We are looking at just air pollution in a city we are not interested in identifying which industry caused the air pollution

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 372

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2005, 10:19
Picked D as well.

HMTG.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 349

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 1

Location: USA

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2005, 08:45
D for me. If D is true, we still would not know if the companies that were exempted from air pollution standards actually caused air pollution.

gmat2me2, B states that in Dec 1988, a more accurate spectometer was put to use. It is possible that the earlier spectrometer misread air pollution values and exaggerated the pollutants.

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1480

Kudos [?]: 425 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2005, 08:48
D for me. If D is true, we still would not know if the companies that were exempted from air pollution standards actually caused air pollution.

gmat2me2, B states that in Dec 1988, a more accurate spectometer was put to use. It is possible that the earlier spectrometer misread air pollution values and exaggerated the pollutants.

no. it was not used. it was only invented. its B).
_________________

If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.

Kudos [?]: 425 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 139

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2005, 10:49
Yup..
"B" Wins...as stated above

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 403

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2005, 13:08
IMO, (B) has the same value as (D).
(B) may mean, that with the invention of new spectometer it became possible to measure the level of pollution more accurately. It also implies, that previous spectometers' measure were incorrect, and it became obvious only with the new spectometer that correctly measured the level of pollution soon after it's invention.

As for (D),
We may also assume, that after mayor was found to have exempted some industries from measure controls, he was made to cancel exemptions, thus decreasing the level of pollution in the next year. However, there is no evidence of whether or not he changed his policy toward those industries.

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 666

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2005, 17:15
Option D goes way too tangential. The answer choice should be relevant to the scope and at the same time least helpful. Thats the only reason I picked B

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 139

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2005, 17:52
B is the best choice because it only tell you about the invention...whether it was applied or not, who knows??

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

19 Jul 2005, 17:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.