It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 19:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air

Author Message
Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 524

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Location: US
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2005, 10:01
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1051

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 0

Location: CA

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2005, 21:26
E- If this is the case, then the pollution level in 88' wouldn't be so high

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 14 Nov 2005
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2005, 22:30
I would choose D.

Since we have to choose one that is least helpful, all answer choices helps to explain the decrease in pollution level in 1989, except for answer D. Given the pollution exemption, we should see an increase in pollution level.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 498

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2005, 01:59

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 524

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Location: US

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2005, 09:50
OA is B.

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 524

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Location: US

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2005, 09:52
Since monitoring is different from actual increase or decrease B is the best choice.

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

20 Nov 2005, 09:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by