It is currently 25 Jun 2017, 15:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air

Author Message
Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 572
Location: NYC
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2005, 23:09
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.

Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?

(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.
_________________

Success is my only option, failure is not -- Eminem

Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 137

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2005, 23:14
IMHO D
VP
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1053
Location: CA

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2005, 23:25
I will go with B

The fact that a gas spectrometer was invented doesn't explain the pollution levels. If it was used, then maybe its another story
_________________

Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...

VP
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1057
Location: USA

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2005, 23:33
ArriveD at D after kicking out A.

We need to explain why:
1. Number of alerts were high in 87 & 88
2. Number if alerts decreased in 89

A/B/C/E may help in explaing #1 and/or #2.

D is not relevent.
_________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

- Bernard Edmonds

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 415
Location: India, Chennai

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2005, 01:09
giddi77 wrote:
ArriveD at D after kicking out A.

We need to explain why:
1. Number of alerts were high in 87 & 88
2. Number if alerts decreased in 89

A/B/C/E may help in explaing #1 and/or #2.

D is not relevent.

I agree it should be D.
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1689

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2005, 02:14
This should be 'B'.

It is clearly 'B', it doesn't explain/talk anything about increase or decrease in the pollution levels!
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 547
Location: Germany

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2005, 02:16
Could exemptions (for industry who gave donations) from the pollution control measures lead to an increase of pollution? Yes they can.

Therefore D is out for the least helpful...

I think it's B
Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 718

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2005, 03:38
I think it is B
Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 79
Location: Hong Kong

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2005, 09:45
B.

The new spectro is more accurate. But we cannot infer that the old spectro is NOT accurate enough to give wrong readings. We can only say the old spectro is less accurate.

Not confident thou...

OA?
Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 572
Location: NYC

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2005, 09:53
OA is B
_________________

Success is my only option, failure is not -- Eminem

VP
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1057
Location: USA

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2005, 12:18
TeHCM wrote:
I will go with B

The fact that a gas spectrometer was invented doesn't explain the pollution levels. If it was used, then maybe its another story

Good catch TeHCM!!

Moral of the story:
1. Read carefully. Take a HAMMER and try to BEAT up each of the choices
2. Don't apply YOUR knowledge of the subject
_________________

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."

- Bernard Edmonds

27 Dec 2005, 12:18
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air 2 23 Feb 2010, 09:05
1 In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air 9 05 Aug 2009, 08:55
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air 6 16 Jul 2008, 08:13
1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air 9 09 Jan 2008, 13:04
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air 7 04 Aug 2007, 03:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by