GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Mar 2019, 20:14

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In 1990, television owners in the town of Mayfield received only one

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1722
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
In 1990, television owners in the town of Mayfield received only one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Feb 2019, 08:22
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

81% (01:43) correct 19% (02:02) wrong based on 58 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In 1990, television owners in the town of Mayfield received only one public station. During an average prime-time hour, that station attracted 75,000 viewers. In 1991, another public station began broadcasting in the region. In 1991, the two stations together attracted 150,000 viewers during an average prime-time hour. With two public stations represented on television, the number of Mayfield residents who watched public prime-time programming doubled.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the author's conclusion?

A. The second public station is received by many television viewers outside the Mayfield area, and the station's figures for prime-time viewership represent viewers from its entire broadcast region.

B. The cost of opening and operating a second public station in the region has placed a serious financial burden on the state.

C. In a recent survey, one in ten Mayfield residents reported watching public television for the first time in 1991.

D. The two stations show the same programming during prime time, although their schedules vary slightly during nonprime-time hours.

E. It was hoped by public station programmers that, in 1991, the two stations would attract 190,000 viewers during an average prime-time hour.

_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Posts: 69
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: ISB '20 (D), NUS '21
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.3
Premium Member Reviews Badge
In 1990, television owners in the town of Mayfield received only one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Feb 2019, 09:39
2
aragonn wrote:
In 1990, television owners in the town of Mayfield received only one public station. During an average prime-time hour, that station attracted 75,000 viewers. In 1991, another public station began broadcasting in the region. In 1991, the two stations together attracted 150,000 viewers during an average prime-time hour. With two public stations represented on television, the number of Mayfield residents who watched public prime-time programming doubled.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the author's conclusion?

Argument:
The number of Mayfield residents who watched public prime-time programming doubled on the public station since the number of stations doubled.

Objective:
To find an option the weakens the argument. So, any option that suggests that number of viewers in the town did not double will be correct.

A. The second public station is received by many television viewers outside the Mayfield area, and the station's figures for prime-time viewership represent viewers from its entire broadcast region.- Correct. This option clearly points out that viewers from outside the Mayfield area also contributed to the increase in viewership.

B. The cost of opening and operating a second public station in the region has placed a serious financial burden on the state.- Wrong. This option is irrelevant to our objective. We are not concerned with cost running a second public station.

C. In a recent survey, one in ten Mayfield residents reported watching public television for the first time in 1991.- Wrong. This option doesn't tell us whether or not number of viewers in the town double.

D. The two stations show the same programming during prime time, although their schedules vary slightly during nonprime-time hours. Wrong. This option is irrelevant as it doesn't effects our objective.

E. It was hoped by public station programmers that, in 1991, the two stations would attract 190,000 viewers during an average prime-time hour. - Wrong. This option is irrelevant to our objective.

_________________

If my post was helpful, kindly contribute a Kudos.

SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1722
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: In 1990, television owners in the town of Mayfield received only one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Feb 2019, 07:32
aragonn wrote:
In 1990, television owners in the town of Mayfield received only one public station. During an average prime-time hour, that station attracted 75,000 viewers. In 1991, another public station began broadcasting in the region. In 1991, the two stations together attracted 150,000 viewers during an average prime-time hour. With two public stations represented on television, the number of Mayfield residents who watched public prime-time programming doubled.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the author's conclusion?

A. The second public station is received by many television viewers outside the Mayfield area, and the station's figures for prime-time viewership represent viewers from its entire broadcast region.

B. The cost of opening and operating a second public station in the region has placed a serious financial burden on the state.

C. In a recent survey, one in ten Mayfield residents reported watching public television for the first time in 1991.

D. The two stations show the same programming during prime time, although their schedules vary slightly during nonprime-time hours.

E. It was hoped by public station programmers that, in 1991, the two stations would attract 190,000 viewers during an average prime-time hour.

Official Explanation:


Conclusion: With two public stations represented on television, the number of Mayfield residents who watched public prime-time programming doubled.

Premise: During an average prime-time hour, that station attracted 75,000 viewers. In 1991, the two stations together attracted 150,000 viewers during an average prime-time hour.

Assumption: There is no other way to interpret the facts. The only viewers who watched in 1991 were Mayfield residents.

This is a weaken question, as evidenced by the phrase Which of the following…most seriously weakens the author's conclusion. The passage uses the premise that In 1990, television owners in…Mayfield received only one public station...During an average prime-time hour, that station attracted 75,000 viewers. In 1991, another public station began broadcasting…the two stations together attracted 150,000 viewers during an average prime-time hour. The passage concludes that With two public stations represented on television, the number of Mayfield residents who watched public prime-time programming doubled.

The passage contains an interpretation of evidence reasoning pattern because it interprets statistics. The argument provides two sets of data, from 1990 and 1991. Because the values for 1991 are twice as much as 1990, the argument concludes that Mayfield residents who watched public prime-time programming doubled. The standard assumption of an argument with an interpretation of evidence reasoning pattern is that there is no other way to interpret the facts.

This argument assumes that the data about viewers during an average prime-time hour can be generalized to support a conclusion about Mayfield residents who watched public prime-time programming, and that no other conclusion is possible. There is a language shift between the premise, which refers to viewers, and the conclusion, which refers to Mayfield residents. Therefore, another assumption is that these two ideas are equivalent—that the viewers referred to in the data were all Mayfield residents. Because this is a weaken question, the correct answer either provides an alternative explanation or interpretation of the data, or challenges the assumption that the viewers referred to in the data were all Mayfield residents. Evaluate the answer choices.

Choice A: Correct. If The second…station is received by many television viewers outside the Mayfield area, and the station's figures for prime-time viewership represent viewers from its entire broadcast region, then the conclusion that the number of Mayfield residents who watched public prime-time programming doubled is not necessarily true. The number of viewers doubled, but the percentage of those viewers that were Mayfield residents is uncertain.

Choice B: No. The cost of opening and operating a second public station is out of scope. The passage is concerned with the number of people who may have watched the station’s programming.

Choice C: No. The fact that one in ten Mayfield residents reported watching public television for the first time is out of scope, since it is not relevant whether the viewers in the statistical data were first-time viewers.

Choice D: No. The fact that The two stations show the same programming during prime time is out of scope. The passage is concerned with the number of viewers who are residents.

Choice E: No. The phrase hoped by public station programmers is out of scope. The passage is concerned with the number of viewers who are residents.

The correct answer is choice A.
_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood

GMAT Club Bot
Re: In 1990, television owners in the town of Mayfield received only one   [#permalink] 26 Feb 2019, 07:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 1990, television owners in the town of Mayfield received only one

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.