GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Jun 2019, 12:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 1
In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2010, 02:24
6
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

64% (01:55) correct 36% (02:10) wrong based on 703 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to support the unemployed citizens. In 1998,8 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to such funds, although that unemployment rate has decreased in 1998 than in 1992.
Each of the following, if true, could explain the simultaneous increase in percent of every dollar paid in tax to support the unemployed citizens and decrease in the number of unemployment rate EXCEPT:

A. On average, each unemployed citizen received more money in 1998 than 1992.

B. On average, people paid less tax in 1998 than in 1992.

C. The individuals had paid more tax than did enterprises during this period.

D. Income before tax has significantly decreased since 1992.

E. The number of tax evaders rose sharply between 1992 and 1998.

Plz explain this one..
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 369
Location: United States (MA)

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2010, 02:39
Its C - out of the scope of information provided in question.
Senior Manager
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 346
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2010, 20:00
Narrowed down on option C and D.

D. Income before tax has significantly decreased since 1992 -- figured out that if the income reduced since 1992, to keep up with the same level of tax, the percentage of income taxed should move up and that explains the increase in the tax %.

Hence option C should be the answer.

Option A, B and E was easy to eliminate because of straight forward logic.
_________________
Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1364
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2011, 01:44
In 1992, 0.5T1 = Allowance-1

In 1998, 0.8T2 = Allowance-2

T1 - Tax Money in 1992
T2 - Tax Money in 1998

A. On average, each unemployed citizen received more money in 1998 than 1992. - Hence more Money was be given by increasing Allowance, it's clear that Allowance-2 > Allowance-1.

B. On average, people paid less tax in 1998 than in 1992. Hence more Money should be given by increasing Allowance, as T2 is less.

C. The individuals had paid more tax than did enterprises during this period. Awkward choice.

D. Income before tax has significantly decreased since 1992. Hence more Money should be given by increasing Allowance, as T2 is less

E. The number of tax evaders rose sharply between 1992 and 1998. Hence more Money should be given by increasing Allowance, as T2 is less

So it's clear from answer choices that except C, all other account for increase in Allowance or Decrease in Tax Money. So the answer is C.
_________________
Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings
Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 127

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2011, 03:29
Comparison should be between tax paid in 1992 and in 1998,not between individual groups.
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 218
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2011, 04:35
1
1
We are looking for an option that says that lesser total amount of support was provided (since less no of people were unemployed) in 1998 than in 1992. If per dollar of tax more cents were taken, the total amount of dollars should decrease from 1992 to 1998 to make the product lesser. i.e. if 8 % of Y< 5 % of X, clearly Y should be less than X.
So any option which says less total tax was collected in 1998 than that collected in 1992 is correct. Lets check:
B says directly that less tax was paid in 1998, E says tax evaders were more in 1998 which can imply that total tax collected decreased, and D says that income itself decreased, which means tax wouls have decreased too. B, E, D eliminated.
A says that the support provided per person was more in 1998- this provides for less no . of people to support- as the product which is total support would still remain as much or more in 1992. thus it supports too.

C is irrelevant and doesnt support.
Intern
Joined: 27 Mar 2014
Posts: 5
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 09-04-2014
GPA: 4
Re: In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2014, 03:56
we can easily eliminate A B and e which leave us with two c and d
Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 98
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Re: In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2015, 00:32
Whether individuals or enterprises paid more tax does not explain why there is increase in percentage of per dollar tax paid to unemployed. Hence C is right.
_________________
+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"
Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2016
Posts: 180
Location: India
GPA: 3.2
Re: In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2017, 03:08
1
I dont why A is incorrect - what does it have to do with tax rate rising and unemployment falling?; its irrelevant. Please help. Thanks.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2871
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2017, 05:04
1
OreoShake wrote:
I dont why A is incorrect - what does it have to do with tax rate rising and unemployment falling?; its irrelevant. Please help. Thanks.

The argument states the following:
1992:Money available for unemployed people = M1 (5%), No. of unemployed people N1 (high).
1998: Money available for unemployed people = M2 (8%) , No. of unemployed people N2 (low).

M2>M1, and N2<N1.

A straight mathematical explanation for the above is:
M2/N2 > M1/N1

i.e. each person receives more money in 1998 than in 1992.

Thus A can explain the discrepancy and hence is incorrect.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 345
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2017, 23:00
In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to support the unemployed citizens. In 1998,8 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to such funds, although that unemployment rate has decreased in 1998 than in 1992.
Each of the following, if true, could explain the simultaneous increase in percent of every dollar paid in tax to support the unemployed citizens and decrease in the number of unemployment rate EXCEPT:

1992
Total tax =100x
goes to UE = 5x

1998
Total tax =100y
goes to UE = 8y

unemployment rate has decreased in 1998 than in 1992

=> Tax rate can decrease
=> payment to unemployed can increase because of inflation, xyz reason.

A. On average, each unemployed citizen received more money in 1998 than 1992.

B. On average, people paid less tax in 1998 than in 1992.

D. Income before tax has significantly decreased since 1992.

E. The number of tax evaders rose sharply between 1992 and 1998

Except C, ABDE can be the reason.
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 473
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5
In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2017, 03:31
Hi sayantanc2k,

I have questions for A,B,D,E - all these explain increase in unemployment funds allowance, but how do they explain decrease in unemployment rate? because the question asks for simultaneous increase allowance to this fund and decrease in unemployment rate. Or we have to assume that increase in allowance will bring down the unemployment rate.

Although C does n't do anything to the argument and unarguably it is the best choice here. But i wanted to know the answer for question above.

Thanks
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4611
Re: In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2019, 22:13
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: In 1992, 5 percent of every dollar paid in tax went to   [#permalink] 21 Mar 2019, 22:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by