Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 13:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Dedicates 2013 to MBA !!
Joined: 06 Jul 2012
Posts: 56
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 161 [1] , given: 14

In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2013, 14:23
1
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

49% (02:42) correct 51% (02:06) wrong based on 381 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters of the country of Belukia. Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally that year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996
B. The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat is has increased steadily since 1992.
C. Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed lobster-fishing boats.
D. The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than 9,000 tons.
E. A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats were out of business between 1992 and 1996
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Thanks and Regards,
Charu Kapoor

Never Never Never GIVE UP !!

If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 1231
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: 1540 Q800 V740
Followers: 133

Kudos [?]: 587 [2] , given: 19

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2013, 11:17
2
KUDOS
The argument says that the lobster catch in 1996 was 9,000 tonnes below pre-1992 levels. It also says that the 9,000 tonnes were accounted for by illegal lobster harvesting.

Therefore any assumption that the argument depends on must propose a rejected alternative explanation for the 9,000 tonnes.

A) This seems like the alternative explanation that was rejected. If the lobster catch had not declined due to illegal harvesting done earlier, then it could have declined due to illegal harvesting done now.

A) it is.
_________________

GyanOne | Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions Blog

Premium MBA Essay Review|Best MBA Interview Preparation|Exclusive GMAT coaching

Get a FREE Detailed MBA Profile Evaluation | Call us now +91 98998 31738

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10366
Followers: 999

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2014, 21:06
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10366
Followers: 999

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2015, 23:18
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2015
Posts: 114
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 640

Re: In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2016, 15:17
my two pre-assumptions that
1) no shortage of fishes in 1996 than fishes in 1992,
2) the legal boats in 1996 are not less efficient than legal boats in 1992

if there is a drastic shortage of the fishes in 1996, conclusion falls apart
so considering this, choice A almost says the same thing
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 376
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 251

Re: In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2016, 04:39
In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters of the country of Belukia. Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally that year.

1992 1996

Illegal 0 9000
Legal 18000 9000

So the argument is that 9000 from legal has gone to illegal lobster harvesting.
what could be other reason

1. Population of lobster has reduced in the area where harvesting happens.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996

The illegal lobster harvesting was so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996 =>> aligned with prethinking

B. The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased steadily since 1992.

The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has not increased steadily since 1992. So that doesn't mean it can't account for 9000.

E. A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats were out of business between 1992 and 1996 : We are already told that no reduction in the level of legal lobster fishing activity, so we have to take it on face value. May be some other business has started.
Re: In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting   [#permalink] 20 Aug 2016, 04:39
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Lockeport's commercial fishing boats use gill nets, which 4 21 Oct 2012, 20:48
3 The fishing industry 4 19 Oct 2016, 04:52
2 In 1992 Outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting 12 02 Sep 2016, 08:13
65 In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting 20 21 Dec 2016, 11:42
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers 7 19 May 2017, 08:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by