Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 16:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 179
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jun 2007, 09:14
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:01) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters of the country of Belukia. Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally that year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.
B. The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased steadily since 1992.
C. Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed lobster-fishing boats.
D. The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than 9,000 tons.
E. A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats went out of business between 1992 and 1996.
Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 707
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jun 2007, 14:21
B for me.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 286
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Jun 2007, 01:16
B for me
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 436
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Jun 2007, 02:16
Jamesk486 wrote:
In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters of the country of Belukia. Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally that year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.
B. The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased steadily since 1992.
C. Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed lobster-fishing boats.
D. The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than 9,000 tons.
E. A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats went out of business between 1992 and 1996.

Conclusion of the argument - outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally in 1996.
Support for the conclusion: local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels
Assumption: average tonnage of the cathcable lobsters didn't change from 1992 to 1996. Only basing in this assumption can we do a conclusion about exact quantity of fish caught illegally.

Re: CR question   [#permalink] 02 Jun 2007, 02:16
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers 7 24 Jul 2008, 18:37
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers 3 26 Feb 2008, 08:32
In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting 1 01 Oct 2007, 08:19
Q11: In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting 9 16 Jul 2007, 23:08
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers 0 10 Jul 2008, 13:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by