It is currently 24 Feb 2018, 15:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4327
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2013, 06:07
3
This post received
KUDOS
‘for doing a report’ in D is idiomatically inferior to ‘to do a report” because there is a purpose. But does it mean that GMAT is ideologically opposed to the gerund ‘doing’ and that you have no instance of the gerund being passable? In sum, can we pardon an idiomatic goof-up? If yes, then choose D;

On the contrary, the pronoun ‘it’ can refer undoubtedly both to house or the committee; Ambiguity has very crept in; now can we pardon ambiguity as has GMAT done in many cases. If yes, then choose E. I would rather pardon idiom thing than ambiguity
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Posts: 41
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT Date: 12-10-2013
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Re: In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2013, 14:20
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
It seems that OA is not available for this.
But this is what one of the expert has to say about it :

E is definitely the best choice. While "it" is technically ambiguous (both the White House and the Federal Advisory Committee of experts are possible antecedents), none of the other choices provide a better alternative. Remember, while the GMAT prefers non-ambiguous references, if the reference is clear from the context of the sentence then seemingly ambiguous references aren't considered ambiguous.

Since the White House "named", parallelism dictates that the White House also "assigned", making "it" non-ambiguous.

Idiomatically we can "do a report", so (E) is also the idiomatic winner. "assigned for doing a report" will never be correct on the GMAT (as an aside, "assigned to do a report" without the "it" would be fine and arguably superior to (E)).
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Nov 2015
Posts: 53
Re: In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jan 2016, 00:44
It should be D. It is a simple question according to me.

Posting a reply so if a majority is taken to choose the OA, then it should be D.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 02 May 2015
Posts: 260
Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Insurance)
Re: In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2016, 22:09
Found this gem on the net:

The expressions differ both referentially and grammatically: in terms of reference, '(in order) to do' specifies the purpose of an action, while 'for doing' specifies the purpose/use of a thing (typically an object). They differ grammatically in that 'in order to do' functions as an adverbial modifier to a verb phrase, whereas 'for doing' functions simply as a complement. Thus we say e.g.

He picked up his pen in order to write a letter.

(not *...for writing....), answering the question WHY did he pick up his pen?,

but

A pen is for writing.

(not *...(in order) to write), answering the quite different question WHAT is a pen FOR?.


IMO

for doing : What is the general purpose?
to do : Specific purpose.

The committee was formed with a specific purpose; hence to do beats for doing. Even though there's a slight chance of ambiguity and I don't agree wholeheartedly with the question.

E.
_________________

Kudos if I helped ;)

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1377
Re: In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2016, 02:50
windy_city wrote:
In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden
chairperson of the federal advisory committee of
experts they assigned to do a report on the history
and ethics of the government’s radiation experiments
on humans in the 1950’s and 1960’s .

1) they assigned to do
2) to be assigned doing
3) that was being assigned doing
4) assigned for doing
5) it assigned to do

Please explain your answer!
No OA OR OE


a characteristic feacture of englis is that a verb can go with another verb or a noun through idiom expression.

we have the following idiom

asigne somebody to do something.

b and c are wrong. assigne somebody doing , not idiomatic. D is also wrong. assigne for doing. no idiom.

between a and e.

"they" can not refer to " whitehouse". "it" can.

e is correct
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 359
CAT Tests
Re: In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2017, 02:45
All of them sound strange, but D is the best fit in terms of meaning and pronoun placement
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jan 2018
Posts: 9
Re: In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2018, 22:46
Can you please explain what is wrong with OE - E ?

I feel E should be the correct response, but other answers indicate D.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3315
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jan 2018, 05:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
DhruvPatelD10 wrote:
Can you please explain what is wrong with OE - E ?

I feel E should be the correct response, but other answers indicate D.


E is alright.
D is wrong because "for doing" has been used to depict purpose. To depict purpose, infinitive "to + verb" is to be used.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Oct 2017
Posts: 15
CAT Tests
Re: In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Feb 2018, 03:31
Please clarify as to why D cannot be an effective choice.
E doesn't sound correct with the use of ''it''.

Please explain.

Thanks,

ucb2k7
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 18
Location: India
GPA: 4
CAT Tests
Re: In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2018, 11:29
Can someone clarify if it should be D or E? Coz I find no reason to choose E..as "it" has no clear antecedent.
Re: In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson   [#permalink] 18 Feb 2018, 11:29

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 30 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 1994 the white house named Dr RuthR. Faden chairperson

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.