It is currently 23 Jun 2017, 11:00

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 258
In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Oct 2011, 11:39
1
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (02:28) correct 39% (01:45) wrong based on 437 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the United States and reported profits of \$50 million in 2000. During the next five years, the chain added 20 stores per year for a total of 150 stores in the United States and Canada in 2005. Profits increased each year at a rate of 10 percent.

Which of the following can be concluded based on the passage above?
A. The stores in Canada were not as profitable as those in the United States.
B. Between 2000 and 2005, average revenue per store decreased.
C. On average, the stores were less profitable in 2005 than in 2000.
D. Profit per store, or average profit, will continue to decrease if the chain continues to expand the number of stores.
E. If Gregory’s Grocery shuts down some of its stores, average profitability will increase.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2010
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Oct 2011, 13:23
3
KUDOS
DeeptiM wrote:
In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the United States and reported
profits of \$50 million in 2000. During the next five years, the chain added 20 stores per
year for a total of 150 stores in the United States and Canada in 2005. Profits increased
each year at a rate of 10 percent.
Which of the following can be concluded based on the passage above?
A. The stores in Canada were not as profitable as those in the United States.
B. Between 2000 and 2005, average revenue per store decreased.
C. On average, the stores were less profitable in 2005 than in 2000.
D. Profit per store, or average profit, will continue to decrease if the chain continues to
expand the number of stores.
E. If Gregory’s Grocery shuts down some of its stores, average profitability will increase.

Per the question stem...arn't the stores more profitable in 2005 than in 2000? or am i missing something...pls help explain..

C)
In 2000: 50 stores; 50\$ profit; Average profit=1
In 2001: 70 stores; 55\$ profit; Average profit=55/70<1
In 2002: 90 stores; 61\$ profit; Average profit=61/90<1 and also less than previous.
So, the average profit per store is decreasing.

B) Sole possible contender.
We know nothing about the revenue; So, we can't comment.

2000; Expenditure=50 million; Revenue=100 mill; Profit= 50 mil
2001; Expenditure=200 million; Revenue=255 mill; Profit= 55 mil
OR
2001; Expenditure=1 million; Revenue=56 mill; Profit= 55 mil

We saw that revenue could have increased or decreased. So, not must be true.

Ans: "C"
_________________
Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 9
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Oct 2011, 13:32
I think it's 'C' .
Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2011
Posts: 25
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Oct 2011, 21:24
It's C, I actually did a quick mental calculation of profits earned each year but I don't think it's necessary.

Good explanation fluke, I spent more than 1.5 min calculating profits, what a waste of time
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Posts: 278
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GPA: 3.81
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Sep 2013, 16:09
Why is D wrong again? Isnt D kinda same as C? What am I missing here?
_________________

Citius, Altius, Fortius

Intern
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 11
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q47 V35
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Sep 2013, 04:30
It should be D i think bcoz as per calculation..
avg profit in 2000 50/50 = 1
avg profit in 2001 (50+5)/50+20 < 1
avg profit in 2002 (55+5.5)/90 < 1.....

its decreasing in this manner....
whereas in C,it is not clear what we mean by avg profit.The stores might be profitable compared to previous yeras and still the profit per store might come out less.
Princeton Review Representative
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 161
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Sep 2013, 05:42
This is an inference question so you evaluate whether the answers must be true based on the facts provided in the paragraph, any answers with information outside the scope of the paragraph cannot be the answer.
DeeptiM wrote:
In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the United States and reported
profits of \$50 million in 2000. During the next five years, the chain added 20 stores per
year for a total of 150 stores in the United States and Canada in 2005. Profits increased
each year at a rate of 10 percent.
Which of the following can be concluded based on the passage above?
A. The stores in Canada were not as profitable as those in the United States.[color=#ff0000]We don't have any information for comparing Canada to United States, we only know that profit increased by 10% [/color]
B. Between 2000 and 2005, average revenue per store decreased.We are only told about profit, not revenue so this cannot be the answer
C. On average, the stores were less profitable in 2005 than in 2000.This must be true, especially considering it is discussing average you do not have to do the calculations but you can determine that if profit went up only 10% and the number of stores more than doubled that the average profit per store has gone down
D. Profit per store, or average profit, will continue to decrease if the chain continues to
expand the number of stores.information about the future is out of scope because the argument does not make any claims about what will happen in the future, this is certainly a possibility but it does not have to be true
E. If Gregory’s Grocery shuts down some of its stores, average profitability will increase.Same as D, we do not know what will happen if Gregory's closes stores thus future events are out of scope

Per the question stem...arn't the stores more profitable in 2005 than in 2000? or am i missing something...pls help explain..

_________________

Special offer! Save \$250 on GMAT Ultimate Classroom, GMAT Small Group Instruction, or GMAT Liveonline when you use the promo code GCVERBAL250. Or, save \$150 on GMAT Self-Prep when you use the code GCVERBAL150. Enroll at www.princetonreview.com

Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 41
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 09-16-2013
GPA: 3.5
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Sep 2013, 11:43
aisaKyu wrote:
It should be D i think bcoz as per calculation..
avg profit in 2000 50/50 = 1
avg profit in 2001 (50+5)/50+20 < 1
avg profit in 2002 (55+5.5)/90 < 1.....

its decreasing in this manner....
whereas in C,it is not clear what we mean by avg profit.The stores might be profitable compared to previous yeras and still the profit per store might come out less.

Choosing D would be based on hypothesis and not based on the info available. Option C, however, is clearly based on the available info.
_________________

Regards,
Suyash

I want to live in a world where emails are short, love letters are brave, and every "Thank you" note is scribbled by hand.
GO GREEN

Princeton Review Representative
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 161
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Sep 2013, 12:05
suyash23n wrote:
aisaKyu wrote:
It should be D i think bcoz as per calculation..
avg profit in 2000 50/50 = 1
avg profit in 2001 (50+5)/50+20 < 1
avg profit in 2002 (55+5.5)/90 < 1.....

its decreasing in this manner....
whereas in C,it is not clear what we mean by avg profit.The stores might be profitable compared to previous yeras and still the profit per store might come out less.

Choosing D would be based on hypothesis and not based on the info available. Option C, however, is clearly based on the available info.

D Discusses future events - which can never be 100% guaranteed unless the paragraph says they are. There are many things which could influence the trend and make D not necessarily true. C does not discuss the future but events which have already occurred and is thus a proper inference.
_________________

Special offer! Save \$250 on GMAT Ultimate Classroom, GMAT Small Group Instruction, or GMAT Liveonline when you use the promo code GCVERBAL250. Or, save \$150 on GMAT Self-Prep when you use the code GCVERBAL150. Enroll at www.princetonreview.com

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 11 Dec 2012
Posts: 313
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Sep 2013, 20:57
DeeptiM wrote:
In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the United States and reported
profits of \$50 million in 2000. During the next five years, the chain added 20 stores per
year for a total of 150 stores in the United States and Canada in 2005. Profits increased
each year at a rate of 10 percent.
Which of the following can be concluded based on the passage above?
A. The stores in Canada were not as profitable as those in the United States.
B. Between 2000 and 2005, average revenue per store decreased.
C. On average, the stores were less profitable in 2005 than in 2000.
D. Profit per store, or average profit, will continue to decrease if the chain continues to
expand the number of stores.
E. If Gregory’s Grocery shuts down some of its stores, average profitability will increase.

The problem with D is that it could be true or it could be false. Either way is possible and we really don't know. Just because something is trending one way doesn't mean it will be that way forever. The next batch of expansions could be in a very prosperous region and then the profits will double instantly. C must be true based on the facts given, so at the very least we should be able to confirm the math using a couple of quick examples (started by AisaKyu):
avg profit in 2000 50/50 = 1 Million / store
avg profit in 2001 (50+5)/50+20 --) 55/70 --) 0.78
avg profit in 2002 (55+5.5)/90 --) 60.5/90 --) 0.67
...
avg profit in 2005: 80.53 / 150 = 0.54

You don't have to do all the math, just enough to prove to yourself that answer choice C is factually correct.

Hope this helps!
-Ron
_________________
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10170
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Dec 2014, 03:03
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Director
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 908
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jul 2016, 11:20
DeeptiM wrote:
In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the United States and reported profits of \$50 million in 2000. During the next five years, the chain added 20 stores per year for a total of 150 stores in the United States and Canada in 2005. Profits increased each year at a rate of 10 percent.

Which of the following can be concluded based on the passage above?

A. The stores in Canada were not as profitable as those in the United States.
B. Between 2000 and 2005, average revenue per store decreased.
C. On average, the stores were less profitable in 2005 than in 2000.
D. Profit per store, or average profit, will continue to decrease if the chain continues to expand the number of stores.
E. If Gregory’s Grocery shuts down some of its stores, average profitability will increase.

Profit in 2000 is given and in 2005 can be calculated.

Split of US and Canada stores is not given

Total stores at the end of each year is known.

A. The stores in Canada were not as profitable as those in the United States. Since we don't know the split between the stores, we can't conclude the profit split between the stores.
B. Between 2000 and 2005, average revenue per store decreased. Cost is not given, and hence revenue can not be calculated.
C. On average, the stores were less profitable in 2005 than in 2000. Hold it as the choice talks about profits.
D. Profit per store, or average profit, will continue to decrease if the chain continues to expand the number of stores. We don't know the trend will continue.
E. If Gregory’s Grocery shuts down some of its stores, average profitability will increase. What if it closes high profit stores. We are not sure about this statement to b true.

_________________

I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2015
Posts: 335
Location: United States
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Aug 2016, 18:18
Answer is C. On average, the stores were less profitable in 2005 than in 2000.

Try drawing a table

Year No. of Stores Revenue Avg revenue per store
2000 50 50m 1 m/s
2001 70 55m 11/14 m/s
2002 90 60.5 ~2/3 m/s

D is a trap, since it does speak about Average Profit per store, but we dont know it will continue to decrease.
Re: In 2000, Gregory's Grocery had a total of 50 stores in the   [#permalink] 07 Aug 2016, 18:18
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 The Green Peas Grocery Store in the remote wealthy enclave of Luxville 3 07 Jun 2016, 16:29
Two new grocery stores, Shoprite and Megashop 1 05 Sep 2013, 06:04
1 A convenience store manager noticed that a cooler which had 27 24 Apr 2017, 02:22
9 In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of 6 12 Feb 2016, 19:36
17 In Eastland, from 2000 to 2005, the total consumption of 13 07 Sep 2015, 09:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by