Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 22:11 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 22:11

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618846 [21]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Posts: 3137
Own Kudos [?]: 2769 [10]
Given Kudos: 1510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Send PM
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2019
Posts: 169
Own Kudos [?]: 114 [3]
Given Kudos: 298
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2019
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 23 [2]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: In 2003 Acme Computer priced its computers five times higher than its [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
(1) If it were just one ratio for the whole year then we could calculate it. But because it is split into first half and second half, then we would need to know the amounts. Let’s say the company sold 300 computers and 200 computers in first half of the year. And then in the second half of the year, the company could have sold 200 more computers and 100 more printers. But it could also have sold 400 more computers and 200 more printers. That would make a huge difference when we add the two half years together. (Insufficient)

(2) This tells us nothing about the number of computers or printers sold which we need, since we already know the price ratio. (Insufficient)
Combined - cannot solve either. statement (2) does not help (Insufficient)

Answer: E
Tutor
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 1315
Own Kudos [?]: 3136 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Send PM
Re: In 2003 Acme Computer priced its computers five times higher than its [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
In 2003 Acme Computer priced its computers five times higher than its printers. What is the ratio of its gross revenue for computers and printers respectively in the year 2003?

(1) In the first half of 2003 it sold computers and printers in the ratio of 3:2, respectively, and in the second half in the ratio of 2:1.

(2) It sold each computer for $1000.



Project DS Butler Data Sufficiency (DS3)


For DS butler Questions Click Here


Statements combined:
Consider EXTREMES.

Case 1: 3,000,000 computers and 2,000,000 printers sold in the first half, 2 computers and 1 printer sold in the second half
In this case, the SECOND half of the year has virtually no effect on the revenue ratio.
As a result, the revenue ratio is determined almost solely by the number of units sold in the FIRST half of the year.

Case 2: 3 computers and 2 printers sold in the first half, 2,000,000 computers and 1,000,000 printers sold in the second half
In this case, the FIRST half of the year has virtually no effect on the revenue ratio.
As a result, the revenue ratio is determined almost solely by the number of units sold in the SECOND half of the year.

Since each case will yield different revenue ratios, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.

Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2020
Posts: 180
Own Kudos [?]: 140 [0]
Given Kudos: 151
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Sustainability
Send PM
Re: In 2003 Acme Computer priced its computers five times higher than its [#permalink]
(1) In the first half of 2003 it sold computers and printers in the ratio of 3:2, respectively, and in the second half in the ratio of 2:1.

Since we only know the proportion but not the price, it's difficult to calculate the profit figure.

(insufficient)


(2) It sold each computer for $1000.

Since the question stem states that Acme Computer priced its computers five times higher than its printers, price for

Price of computer = 5(price of printer)
1000/5= 200

C for printer =200
C for computer =1000

But we only have prices for each, we need the total number of pieces sold to derive to revenue figures.

(Insufficient)


Taking A and B,

'computers and printers sold in the ratio of 3:2 in the first half '

3000+400 = 3400 in the first half

2000+ 200 = 2200 in the second half

3400+2200 = 5600 ...total revenue

OA :C

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Feb 2018
Posts: 86
Own Kudos [?]: 118 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Re: In 2003 Acme Computer priced its computers five times higher than its [#permalink]
IMO A

C = 5P
Ratio of gross revenue = c*x/y*p = 5p*x/p*y = 5x/y
CONDITION I:
ratio was 3/2+2 =5/2
Hence Gross ratio = 5*5/2
SUFFICIENT
Condition II :
Cost of computer is given which has no bearing on total
no of computers and printers sold
Insufficient
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Jun 2021
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: In 2003 Acme Computer priced its computers five times higher than its [#permalink]
Given C = 5P ( Cost of computer) Can't we dumb down the question prompt to
\(\frac{Rev from Computer}{Rev from Printers}\) =\(\frac{ no. sold * 5P}{no. sold * P}\)
and we need the no. of Computers and printers sold from the statements

1) Statement 1 tells us the ratios \(\frac{3x}{2x}\) and \(\frac{2x}{1x}\) and x(i.e. no. of products sold) is unknown so INSUFFICIENT
2) Statement 2 tells us the values of C & subsequently of P but not of n so INSUFFICIENT

Am I wrong here?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 May 2019
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 84
Send PM
Re: In 2003 Acme Computer priced its computers five times higher than its [#permalink]
In this Question, Instead of DS had it been a PS question and same statement would have been given.
Then if Price of a printer - x (Supposed)
Then price of the computer to be 6x or 5x?

As for computers, price is said to be five times higher than printers as higher than is mentioned and not 5 times.

I think it should be 6x.

If anyone could guide on the same.

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Apr 2018
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
Send PM
Re: In 2003 Acme Computer priced its computers five times higher than its [#permalink]
We already know about the ratio of prices. The only thing we need is the ratio of quantities sold.
In statement 1, we have ratios given for two halves separately. But to know overall ratio, we would need the ratio of quantities sold in each half, i.e. how many were sold in each half. We do not have this info. Hence insufficient.

Statement 2 also gives us nothing to know ratio of quantities. Not even the combination of two statements.

See the video solution:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CKEOmU ... L&index=10


Visit www.gmathub.com for personalized gmat training.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In 2003 Acme Computer priced its computers five times higher than its [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92900 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne