It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 20:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 249

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 9

Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2009, 00:25
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:32) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 11 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld that the military commissions established by the Federal government in March 2002 are not legal, as they are violating "both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949."
A) legal, as they are violating
B) legal; a violation of
C) legal, but rather violate
D) legal, but rather they constitute a violation of
E) legal, rather they violate
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 9

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 872

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 18

Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Re: SC Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2009, 02:57
I go with A. What is OA?
Military commissions are not legal 'because' they are violating. Not rather they violate...
I might be wrong.

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 18

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 65

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: SC Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2009, 08:23
I will go with A

rampuria wrote:
In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice Department, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld that the military commissions established by the Federal government in March 2002 are not legal, as they are violating "both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949."
A) legal, as they are violating
B) legal; a violation of (It gives impression that act by US Supreme Court ... is violation)
C) legal, but rather violate
D) legal, but rather they constitute a violation of
E) legal, rather they violate


Rather is used with than, and if used alone then it is used to show the preference. Please share OA?

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 133

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Re: SC Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2009, 18:59
IMO A). What is OA? Please share.
I will go with A) too...here there is no contrast between two sentence and so it requires to continue from previous instead of using rather.

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 347 [0], given: 2

Location: nj
Re: SC Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2009, 19:13
A...imo

a clear clause is introduced by "as" after a comma.

Kudos [?]: 347 [0], given: 2

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 249

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 9

Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Re: SC Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2009, 19:45
OA has been given as C
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 9

Re: SC Supreme Court   [#permalink] 31 Mar 2009, 19:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 2006, contrary to the arguments of the Justice

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.