It is currently 25 Jun 2017, 17:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 585
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2005, 15:57
3
This post received
KUDOS
15
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

74% (02:08) correct 26% (01:12) wrong based on 1153 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

360. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
(D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
(E) on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5043
Location: Singapore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2005, 17:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of
- 'their' does not have a clear referent

(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
- ruled two NY counties to owe restitution is wrong.

(D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
- wrong. suggests indians unlawfully seized their own lands.

(E) on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
- ruled on the restitution is wrong

A it is.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1801
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2005, 17:46
A for me also.

C, D and E does not start with that and B does not end correctly.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 136
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jun 2005, 00:13
A :o
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 61
Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jun 2005, 01:36
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The clause has to start with a proper subordinating coujunction - that. so C, D and E or out.

It is either A or B. ' X owed Y to Z for some reason ' is the idiomatic usage.

The Answer is A.
_________________

Its not the fact its your attitude towards the fact

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 585
Answer [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jun 2005, 22:20
The OA is A.
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 26
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2008, 03:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

a)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Onedida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

b)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of

c)two upstate NewYork counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of

d)on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three triubes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized

e)on the restituition that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

Please provide answer and description.
OA will be right here soon.

Thanks so much!!!

Last edited by mau5 on 26 Aug 2013, 01:02, edited 1 time in total.
Added OA
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 688
Re: SC : the unlawful seizure of ancestral lands [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2008, 06:24
I go for A

In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

a)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Onedida Indians for the unlawful seizure of-> sounds good, hold it

b)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure -> their points Indians and this changes the meaning,eliminate it

c)two upstate NewYork counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of-> awkward usage, eliminate it

d)on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three triubes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized->awkward construction, they points to Indians and changes the meaning to Indians seizing the lands

e)on the restituition that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of->awkward construction
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 140
Re: SC : the unlawful seizure of ancestral lands [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Mar 2008, 09:34
1
This post received
KUDOS
I'll go A.

C and D have modification issues.
E is to wordy.
B has "their" which is ambigious
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 210
Reviews Badge
Re: SC : the unlawful seizure of ancestral lands [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Mar 2008, 12:22
Ill go for A here. Nothing wrong with the sentence. B uses "their" is ambiguous. C,D,E change the meaning.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2950
Re: SC : the unlawful seizure of ancestral lands [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2008, 06:17
I go for A

remember the idiom - "ruled that" (ruled on is incorrect) This leaves A and B. B has some ambiguous pronouns.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 30
Re: SC : the unlawful seizure of ancestral lands [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2008, 00:17
Definitely it is A :) .
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Struggling hard to maintain focus
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 115
Location: Kolkata
Schools: ISB, IIM
Re: SC : the unlawful seizure of ancestral lands [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2011, 13:45
1
This post received
KUDOS
aMante wrote:
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

a)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Onedida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

b)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of

c)two upstate NewYork counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of

d)on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three triubes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized

e)on the restituition that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

Please provide answer and description.
OA will be right here soon.

Thanks so much!!!


Hi,
Is this not a case of subjunctive verb "rule"?
Then why the idiom "owed restitution to X for Y" has been used?
_________________

* An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure
** Every single second counts.
*** One KUDO earned is One step closer to GMAT. Help me in getting closer to GMAT.
**** http://gmatclub.com/forum/i-invite-you-in-my-gmat-journey-121396.html.


Test Description_______Date____Total___Quant_____ Verbal
GMAT PREP1_____________________610
GMAX online test 1____29.07.2011__540_____43________19
MGMAT CAT 1_________03.09.2011__580____42________28
MGMAT CAT 2_________02.10.2011__690____48________36
GMAX online test 2_____16.10.2011__640____48________32
MGMAT CAT 3_________23.11.2011__670____47________34
Veritas free CAT______ 31.10.2011___630___ 46________33
MGMAT CAT 4_________06.11.2011__690____48________36
MGMAT CAT 5_________13.11.2011__660____46________34
MGMAT CAT 6_________19.11.2011__680____51________33
GMAT PREP2__________23.11.2011__680
GMAT Exam___________24.11.2011__690____50________34

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Target MBA
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 200
Location: Singapore
Re: SC : the unlawful seizure of ancestral lands [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2011, 00:51
aMante wrote:
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

a)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Onedida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

b)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of

c)two upstate NewYork counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of

d)on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three triubes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized

e)on the restituition that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

Please provide answer and description.
OA will be right here soon.

Thanks so much!!!



There is nothing wrong in answer choice 'A'
B, C, and D - they/their is ambiguous.
E - "rules on" changes the meaning. "owed to" also changes the meaning.
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
GM.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Struggling hard to maintain focus
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 115
Location: Kolkata
Schools: ISB, IIM
Re: SC : the unlawful seizure of ancestral lands [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2011, 10:47
gautammalik wrote:
aMante wrote:
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

a)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Onedida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

b)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of

c)two upstate NewYork counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of

d)on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three triubes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized

e)on the restituition that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

Please provide answer and description.
OA will be right here soon.

Thanks so much!!!



There is nothing wrong in answer choice 'A'
B, C, and D - they/their is ambiguous.
E - "rules on" changes the meaning. "owed to" also changes the meaning.


As per the subjunctive structure-
]In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owe[strike]d[/strike] restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.
_________________

* An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure
** Every single second counts.
*** One KUDO earned is One step closer to GMAT. Help me in getting closer to GMAT.
**** http://gmatclub.com/forum/i-invite-you-in-my-gmat-journey-121396.html.


Test Description_______Date____Total___Quant_____ Verbal
GMAT PREP1_____________________610
GMAX online test 1____29.07.2011__540_____43________19
MGMAT CAT 1_________03.09.2011__580____42________28
MGMAT CAT 2_________02.10.2011__690____48________36
GMAX online test 2_____16.10.2011__640____48________32
MGMAT CAT 3_________23.11.2011__670____47________34
Veritas free CAT______ 31.10.2011___630___ 46________33
MGMAT CAT 4_________06.11.2011__690____48________36
MGMAT CAT 5_________13.11.2011__660____46________34
MGMAT CAT 6_________19.11.2011__680____51________33
GMAT PREP2__________23.11.2011__680
GMAT Exam___________24.11.2011__690____50________34

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Target MBA
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 200
Location: Singapore
Re: SC : the unlawful seizure of ancestral lands [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2011, 11:01
akbism wrote:
gautammalik wrote:
aMante wrote:
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

a)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Onedida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

b)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of

c)two upstate NewYork counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of

d)on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three triubes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized

e)on the restituition that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of

Please provide answer and description.
OA will be right here soon.

Thanks so much!!!



There is nothing wrong in answer choice 'A'
B, C, and D - they/their is ambiguous.
E - "rules on" changes the meaning. "owed to" also changes the meaning.


As per the subjunctive structure-
]In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owe[strike]d[/strike] restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.



@akbism, I am not sure whether "rule that" is command subjunctive
Can any expert comment on it?
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
GM.

Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3970
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: SC : the unlawful seizure of ancestral lands [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2011, 23:44
Although the main verb ‘ruled that’ may perfectly entail a subjunctive verb ‘owe’ in the subordinate clause, that choice is not there in the lot. Therefore, the author intends to exclude it from the purview of testing the subjunctive mood. On the contrary, this seems to be primarily a test of pronoun reference and idiom.

A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of -------- 1. the unlawful seizure safely dodges the pronoun ambiguity by using the definite article 'the' rather that the more specific pronoun 'their', which seems to be all at sundry as for as its reference is concerned . 1. ‘ruled that’ is the correct idiom – correct choice

b)that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their unlawful seizure of ----pronoun error; the ununderlined 'their' refers to the Indians while the underlined 'their' refers to counties, a weird case of the same pronoun referring two different referents. Grammatically wrong

c)two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of --- same as in B

d)on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized --- 1.The pronoun they is in a fix. Whether it refers to the nearby Indians or the distant Counties is not clear. 2. ‘[color=#0000FF]ruled on’ is wrong idiom
[/color]
e) On the restitution that two upstate New York counties owed to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of. ----- ‘Ruled on’ is wrong idiom
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Location: United States
Re: In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2012, 09:24
Oh, the comparative value of the choices.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 283
Premium Member
Re: In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Mar 2012, 23:10
another correct use of idiom should also be noted here.

owed restitution to x for y
_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.


Last edited by GetThisDone on 22 Mar 2012, 06:45, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Posts: 220
Re: In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Mar 2012, 03:04
Definitely A

subjunctive mood should be used here , only A and B qualify for that.
B is weird with a null reference for theirs.
So A...

Experts please correct if i am wrong.
_________________

The Best Way to Keep me ON is to give Me KUDOS !!!
If you Like My posts please Consider giving Kudos

Shikhar

Re: In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two   [#permalink] 22 Mar 2012, 03:04

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 29 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 Experts publish their posts in the topic Because the Supreme Court has ruled that dqtuan9627 11 31 May 2016, 07:35
46 Experts publish their posts in the topic Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution RohitKalla 16 18 Mar 2017, 09:21
16 Experts publish their posts in the topic Although the Supreme Court ruled as long ago as 1880 that ugimba 31 05 Feb 2017, 13:04
Although the Supreme Court ruled as long ago as 1880 that goalsnr 7 29 May 2013, 19:46
6 In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two seofah 13 02 Jan 2017, 20:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.