Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Posts: 178

In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Dec 2012, 04:38
26
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
65% (03:01) correct
35% (02:06) wrong based on 1096 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered Republicans to the number of registered Democrats was 3/5. After 600 additional Republicans and 500 additional Democrats registered, the ratio was 4/5. After these registrations, there were how many more voters in the district registered as Democrats than as Republicans? (A) 100 (B) 300 (C) 400 (D) 1,000 (E) 2,500
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39723

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Dec 2012, 04:47
6
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
8
This post was BOOKMARKED



Intern
Joined: 12 Dec 2011
Posts: 1

In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Dec 2012, 02:46
In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered Republicans to the number of registered Democrats was 3/5. After 600 additional R and 500 additional D registered, the ratio was 4/5. After these registrations, the there were how many more voters in the district registered as D than as R?
When you solve the two given equations, you arrive at D = 1000, which is perfectly logical. As R = 3/5 D, R must be 600.
Now comes the thing I don't understand. In the sample solution, the newly registered voters are now added to the above numbers, which results in D = 1000 + 600 = 1500, respectively R = 600 + 600 = 1200. The difference is 300 now, which corresponds to the OA. But isn't it true that the numbers which result from solving the given equations must already be post the additions?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39723

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Dec 2012, 02:54
1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
Merging similar topics. Please read carefully and follow: rulesforpostingpleasereadthisbeforeposting133935.html Pay attention to the rule #8: Post Answer Choices for PS Questions tomtom1610 wrote: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered Republicans to the number of registered Democrats was 3/5. After 600 additional R and 500 additional D registered, the ratio was 4/5. After these registrations, the there were how many more voters in the district registered as D than as R?
When you solve the two given equations, you arrive at D = 1000, which is perfectly logical. As R = 3/5 D, R must be 600.
Now comes the thing I don't understand. In the sample solution, the newly registered voters are now added to the above numbers, which results in D = 1000 + 600 = 1500, respectively R = 600 + 600 = 1200. The difference is 300 now, which corresponds to the OA. But isn't it true that the numbers which result from solving the given equations must already be post the additions? As for your question: we are asked to find the difference between the numbers of Democrats and Republicans AFTER the registration of 600 additional Republicans and 500 additional Democrats, so it should be 15001200=300. Hope it's clear.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 28 Oct 2012
Posts: 2

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Mar 2013, 11:45
why cant we write it down as R/D = 3/5 and go further with (R+600)/(D+500). If we combine them we get R = 600 and D = 1000. Difference = 400. Whats wrong with this logic. Thanks in advance



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39723

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Mar 2013, 02:29



Current Student
Joined: 03 Mar 2013
Posts: 24

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2013, 05:03
Hi, just wondering what is wrong with my approach as follows:
3/5 republican voters = 0.6*x Another 600 register as republican, with the total amount being 80% republican (4/5) Total new voters is 1,100 (500+600)
So, 0.6x + 600 = 0.8(x+1,100)
0.6x + 600 = 0.8x + 880
However, this is where I go awry.
Could someone pls explain why I can't use the approach noted above?
Thanks in advance



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39723

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2013, 06:37
insidertrader wrote: Hi, just wondering what is wrong with my approach as follows:
3/5 republican voters = 0.6*x Another 600 register as republican, with the total amount being 80% republican (4/5) Total new voters is 1,100 (500+600)
So, 0.6x + 600 = 0.8(x+1,100)
0.6x + 600 = 0.8x + 880
However, this is where I go awry.
Could someone pls explain why I can't use the approach noted above?
Thanks in advance The ratio of Republicans to Democrats was 3:5, which means that Republicans were 3/(3+5)=3/8 of the total number (not 3/5 of the total number) After 600 additional Republicans and 500 additional Democrats registered, the ratio was 4:5, which means that that Republicans were 4/(4+5)=4/9 of the total number (not 4/5 of the total number). 3/8*x+600=4/9(x+1100) > x=1600 > after registration = x+1100=2700 > Republicans=4/9*1200 and Democrats=1500 > the difference=300. Hope it helps.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Current Student
Joined: 03 Mar 2013
Posts: 24

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2013, 06:45
Bunuel wrote: insidertrader wrote: Hi, just wondering what is wrong with my approach as follows:
3/5 republican voters = 0.6*x Another 600 register as republican, with the total amount being 80% republican (4/5) Total new voters is 1,100 (500+600)
So, 0.6x + 600 = 0.8(x+1,100)
0.6x + 600 = 0.8x + 880
However, this is where I go awry.
Could someone pls explain why I can't use the approach noted above?
Thanks in advance The ratio of Republicans to Democrats was 3:5, which means that Republicans were 3/(3+5)=3/8 of the total number (not 3/5 of the total number) After 600 additional Republicans and 500 additional Democrats registered, the ratio was 4:5, which means that that Republicans were 4/(4+5)=4/9 of the total number (not 4/5 of the total number). 3/8*x+600=4/9(x+1100) > x=1600 > after registration = x+1100=2700 > Republicans=4/9*1200 and Democrats=1500 > the difference=300. Hope it helps. Thanks a lot, appreciate your help!



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 11 Dec 2012
Posts: 313

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2013, 07:48
If ever you're not seeing the math, you know one of the answers has to be correct, so you can just backsolve. Looking at the increase in numbers, it would make sense that the number of democrats MORE than republicans will probably be in the hundreds, so you'd likely start with B or C. If you start with C: 400 is the difference between D's and R's in the new ratio: So there are 4x400 = 1600 Republicans and 5x400 = 2000 Democrats. If you subtract 600 from R and 500 from D, you get 1000 Republicans and 1500 Democrats, a 2/3 ratio. This isn't 3/5, but it's not far (66.7% vs 60%). The next attempt should be B since it's close but slightly too big: B: 300 is the difference between D's and R's in the new ratio: So there are 4x300 = 1200 Republicans and 5x300 = 1500 Democrats. If you subtract 600 from R and 500 from D, you get 600 Republicans and 1000 Democrats, a 3/5 ratio. Bingo. If you started with B, you got to the right answer quickly. If you started with A, D or E, your answer will be way off. While this is not a better solution than the algebraic one, sometimes it is easier to see. Hope this helps! Ron
_________________
Ron Awad Veritas Prep  GMAT Instructor Save $100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Admissions Consulting Services Veritas Prep Reviews



Intern
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 2
GPA: 3.53

Official guide problem solving Q 113 [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Oct 2013, 01:59
In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered Republicans to the number of registered Democrats was 3/5. After 600 additional Republicans and 500 additional Democrats registered, the ratio was 4/5. After these registrations, there were how many more voters in the district registered as Democrats than as Republicans?
(A) 100 (B) 300 (C) 400 (D) 1,000 (E) 2,500
_________
My question is, why can't we take the multiplier which is 200, and multiply the new ratio 4/5 to get a difference of 200? Why is that wrong? that what was done In question 105 in the official guide. Thank you



Moderator
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done!!
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 765
Location: India

Re: Official guide problem solving Q 113 [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Oct 2013, 02:01
mjb2 wrote: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered Republicans to the number of registered Democrats was 3/5. After 600 additional Republicans and 500 additional Democrats registered, the ratio was 4/5. After these registrations, there were how many more voters in the district registered as Democrats than as Republicans?
(A) 100 (B) 300 (C) 400 (D) 1,000 (E) 2,500
_________
My question is, why can't we take the multiplier which is 200, and multiply the new ration 4/5 to get a difference of 200? Why is that wrong? In question 105 in the official guide that what was done. Thank you This post will help you http://gmatclub.com/forum/inacertaindistricttheratioofthenumberofregistered143983.html. Before posting please check whether the same question is discussed or not. In this case it is already discussed.
_________________
Become a GMAT Club Premium member to avail lot of discounts



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39723

Re: Official guide problem solving Q 113 [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Oct 2013, 02:03
mjb2 wrote: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered Republicans to the number of registered Democrats was 3/5. After 600 additional Republicans and 500 additional Democrats registered, the ratio was 4/5. After these registrations, there were how many more voters in the district registered as Democrats than as Republicans?
(A) 100 (B) 300 (C) 400 (D) 1,000 (E) 2,500
_________
My question is, why can't we take the multiplier which is 200, and multiply the new ratio 4/5 to get a difference of 200? Why is that wrong? that what was done In question 105 in the official guide. Thank you Merging similar topics. Please refer to the solutions above and ask if anything is unclear. P.S. All OG13 questions with solutions are here: theofficialguidequantitativequestiondirectory143450.htmlP.P.S. Please read and follow: rulesforpostingpleasereadthisbeforeposting133935.html Pay attention to the rule 1 and 3. Thank you.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 2
GPA: 3.53

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Oct 2013, 02:42
sorry for violating the rules.. I didn't really know them as this was my first post. Anyway, I still don't understand why we can not take the multiplier and multiply it by the new ration 4/5 (200*5)(200*4)= 200 difference.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39723

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Oct 2013, 05:18



GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 16008

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Oct 2014, 09:36
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources



Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2013
Posts: 135

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Dec 2014, 08:32
R/D = 3x/5x
add the new voters: R/D = 3x+600/(5x+500) = 4/5 Solve for x to get x=200. Now put in original equation to get total Republicans as 1200, and the total number of democrats as 1500. difference= 300



Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2015
Posts: 82

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2015, 08:29
Bunuel wrote: mjb2 wrote: sorry for violating the rules.. I didn't really know them as this was my first post. Anyway, I still don't understand why we can not take the multiplier and multiply it by the new ration 4/5 (200*5)(200*4)= 200 difference. Sorry but I don't understand the logic behind your approach. It's a shame this wasn't addressed, Bunuel. Let me follow up this question with the logic and you can let me know why it's wrong. After we find x = 200 as the multiplier, why can't we say that since AFTER these registrations the ratio is 4/5, then 4x/5x. Since x=200, 4x equals 800 registered Republicans, and 5x equals 1000 registered Democrats. Thats means that the difference after the registrations is 1000 Democrats  800 Republicans is 200!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39723

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2015, 09:26
gmatser1 wrote: Bunuel wrote: mjb2 wrote: sorry for violating the rules.. I didn't really know them as this was my first post. Anyway, I still don't understand why we can not take the multiplier and multiply it by the new ration 4/5 (200*5)(200*4)= 200 difference. Sorry but I don't understand the logic behind your approach. It's a shame this wasn't addressed, Bunuel. Let me follow up this question with the logic and you can let me know why it's wrong. After we find x = 200 as the multiplier, why can't we say that since AFTER these registrations the ratio is 4/5, then 4x/5x. Since x=200, 4x equals 800 registered Republicans, and 5x equals 1000 registered Democrats. Thats means that the difference after the registrations is 1000 Democrats  800 Republicans is 200! Because x = 200 is for the old ratio and you cannot use it for the new one.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 29 Apr 2015
Posts: 897
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: Economics, Finance
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)

Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Sep 2015, 03:43
Can we solve this somehow with the "change in ratio" method? Starting ratio: 5R=3D Ending ratio: 5R=4D Now we have a change in ratio of 1 unit in democrats corresponding to 500 democrats. This means, 1 unit in 5:4 represents 500. However I believe this just holds true as long as only one number changes. Since we also have changing numbers of republicans, we can not calculate it like that. Can anyone agree/disagree?
_________________
Saving was yesterday, heat up the gmatclub.forum's sentiment by spending KUDOS!
PS Please send me PM if I do not respond to your question within 24 hours.




Re: In a certain district, the ratio of the number of registered
[#permalink]
08 Sep 2015, 03:43



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 26 posts ]





Similar topics 
Author 
Replies 
Last post 
Similar Topics:


3


In a certain voting district, 40 percent of registered voters live in

felippemed 
3 
07 Jun 2016, 12:27 

12


In a certain state, the ratio of registered Republicans to registered

Bunuel 
7 
13 Aug 2016, 16:42 

17


At a certain university, the ratio of the number of teaching

satishreddy 
14 
21 Mar 2017, 06:13 

37


At a Certain school, the ratio of the number of second

nickesha 
19 
03 Aug 2016, 08:19 

35


At a certain university, the ratio of the number of teaching

scorpio7 
18 
02 Apr 2017, 21:24 



