Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 10:52 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 10:52

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Levelx   Overlapping Setsx                     
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92902
Own Kudos [?]: 618779 [66]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64896 [35]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 6821
Own Kudos [?]: 29905 [14]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Posts: 1304
Own Kudos [?]: 2285 [3]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Send PM
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Video solution from Quant Reasoning:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
General Discussion
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18754
Own Kudos [?]: 22046 [4]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.
(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.


We have a group of 50 people and need to determine how many of those people are doctors with a law degree.

We can use the following formula:

total = # of doctors + # of lawyers - # both + # neither

50 = # of doctors + # of lawyers - # both + # neither

Statement One Alone:

In the group, 36 people are doctors.

So, we have:

50 = 36 + # of lawyers - # both + # neither

24 = # of lawyers - # both + # neither

We cannot determine the number of people who are both. Statement one alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Statement Two Alone:

In the group, 18 people have a law degree.

So, we have:

50 = # of doctors + 18 - # both + # neither

32 = # of doctors - # both + # neither

We cannot determine the number of people who are both. Statement two alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Statements One and Two Together:

Using statements one and two, we have:

50 = 36 + 18 - # both + # neither

-4 = - # both + # neither

# both = 4 + # neither

We still cannot determine the number of “both” since we don’t know the number of “neither.”

Answer: E
Director
Director
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Posts: 620
Own Kudos [?]: 1585 [2]
Given Kudos: 276
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bunuel wrote:
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.
(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.


Total number of people in the group \(= 50\)

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.

Number of doctors \(= 36\)

Number of not doctors \(= 50 - 36 = 14\)

We cannot find Doctors with law degree. Hence I is Not Sufficient.

(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.

Number of people with law degrees \(= 18\)

Number of people without law degrees \(= 50 - 18 = 32\)

We cannot find Doctors with law degree. Hence II is Not Sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2);

Total = 50

Number of doctors = 36

Number of people with law degree = 18.

We cannot find Doctors with law degree. Answer (E)...

Originally posted by sashiim20 on 26 Jun 2017, 02:45.
Last edited by sashiim20 on 26 Jun 2017, 14:21, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
sashiim20 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.
(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.


Total number of people in the group \(= 50\)

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.

Number of doctors \(= 36\)

Number of not doctors \(= 50 - 36 = 14\)

We cannot find Doctors with law degree. Hence I is Not Sufficient.

(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.

Number of people with law degrees \(= 18\)

Number of people without law degrees \(= 50 - 18 = 32\)

We cannot find Doctors with law degree. Hence II is Not Sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2);

Total = 50

Number of doctors = 36

Number of people with law degree = 18.

We cannot find Doctors with law degree. Answer (E)...



To add to it, If we use the formula : Total - neither = D + L - (D&L)
We have Total,
We have D, We have L,
But we cant find (D&L) until we have 'neither'.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Regards,
ashygoyal
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64896 [1]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
ashygoyal wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.
(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.


The question is very simple but it has a small pitfall - some test takers will certainly answer (C) and move on. When we read "Doctors who have a law degree", we immediately think of the intersection of the two sets - doctors and lawyers.

So what might come to mind is Total = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L)

Here is the catch: we don't have the total i.e. the union of the two sets. 50 people is just a certain group. It is not necessary that each one of them is certainly a doctor or a lawyer or both.
In effect, we do not have the number of "neither".

Hence, answer here will be (E).



Hi Karishma,

I think the correct approach would be to use
Total - neither = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L), instead of
Total = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L)


Please note: "... what might come to mind is Total = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L)"
"Here is the catch:... we do not have the number of neither"

The point is we use Total as the union of two sets very often and hence might forget "neither".
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Status:No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Posts: 972
Own Kudos [?]: 4927 [1]
Given Kudos: 690
Concentration: Accounting
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Top Contributor
Bunuel wrote:
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.
(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.


\(Total = Dorctors + Lawyers - Both + Neither\)

\(50= Dorctors + Lawyers - Both + Neither\)

(1) Only the number of Doctors is given. Insufficient.

(2) Only the number of Lawyers is given. Insufficient.

Considering both;

\(50=36+15-Both+ Neither\); We don't have information about either. Insufficient.

The answer is \(E\).
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Posts: 5957
Own Kudos [?]: 13387 [1]
Given Kudos: 124
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.
(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.


Answer: Option E

Video solution by GMATinsight



Get TOPICWISE: Concept Videos | Practice Qns 100+ | Official Qns 50+ | 100% Video solution CLICK HERE.
Two MUST join YouTube channels : GMATinsight (1000+ FREE Videos) and GMATclub :)
Current Student
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 128 [0]
Given Kudos: 31
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
Total=50

1)
No. of Doctors = 36
No. of Not Doctors = 14
No information regarding lawyers ==> Stmt 1 is insufficient

2.
No. of Lawyers = 18
No. of Not Lawyers = 32
No information regarding doctors ==> Stmt 2 is insufficient

1 & 2) Still cannot deduce no. of doctors who are lawyers

Answer is E
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 817
Own Kudos [?]: 969 [0]
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

Total No. Of People = 50

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.

This tells us that there are 36 Doctors, however this does not give us any information on whether they have a law degree or no

Total = 50
Doc = 36
Non-Doc = 14

Hence, (1) =====> is NOT SUFFICIENT

(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.

This tells us that there are 18 people who are having law degree, however, it does not provide us any information on whether they are doctors or non-doctors

Total = 50
Law Degree = 18
Non-Law Degree = 32

Hence, (2) =====> is NOT SUFFICIENT

Combining (1) and (2) we get:

Total = 50
Doc = 36
Non-Doc = 14

Total = 50
Law Degree = 18
Non-Law Degree = 32

Even after combining we are not aware of how many doctors are having a law degree as they are two exclusive sets with no connection provided.

We can have doctors falling under "Law Degree" or "Non-Law Degree" or BOTH as we are not aware of this distribution we will not be able to answer this question.

Hence, Answer is E
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 1186
Own Kudos [?]: 2499 [0]
Given Kudos: 459
Location: India
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
Of course neither statement alone is sufficient.
when we combine, we get that out of 50, 36 are doctors and 18 have a law degree.

But we don't know how many have neither degree. without that info we cant say how many have both degrees.
Say 'x' people have both degrees, then: 36-x are only doctors, 18-x are only lawyers. People having at least one degree = 36-x + x + 18-x = 54 - x, and those having neither degree are: 50 - (54-x) = x-4.

Until we know the value of (x-4) we cant find 'x'. So insufficient. Answer is E
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.
(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.


The question is very simple but it has a small pitfall - some test takers will certainly answer (C) and move on. When we read "Doctors who have a law degree", we immediately think of the intersection of the two sets - doctors and lawyers.

So what might come to mind is Total = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L)

Here is the catch: we don't have the total i.e. the union of the two sets. 50 people is just a certain group. It is not necessary that each one of them is certainly a doctor or a lawyer or both.
In effect, we do not have the number of "neither".

Hence, answer here will be (E).



Hi Karishma,

I think the correct approach would be to use
Total - neither = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L), instead of
Total = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 280
Own Kudos [?]: 370 [0]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.
(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.


Total = 50
Docs who have law degrees = ?

1) 36 are docs
14 are not docs. Law degrees= ?
Insufficient.

2) 18 have law degree.
32 have no law degree.
# of docs = ?
Insufficient.

1+2)
# of doctors = 36
# of law degree = 18
Either 18 doctors have law degrees, or 14 non-docs have law degrees, and 4 doctors have law degrees.
Other variations are also possible.
Insufficient.

E is the answer.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
ashygoyal wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
[quote="Bunuel"]In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.
(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.


The question is very simple but it has a small pitfall - some test takers will certainly answer (C) and move on. When we read "Doctors who have a law degree", we immediately think of the intersection of the two sets - doctors and lawyers.

So what might come to mind is Total = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L)

Here is the catch: we don't have the total i.e. the union of the two sets. 50 people is just a certain group. It is not necessary that each one of them is certainly a doctor or a lawyer or both.
In effect, we do not have the number of "neither".

Hence, answer here will be (E).



Hi Karishma,

I think the correct approach would be to use
Total - neither = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L), instead of
Total = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L)


Please note: "... what might come to mind is Total = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L)"
"Here is the catch:... we do not have the number of neither"

The point is we use Total as the union of two sets very often and hence might forget "neither".[/quote]
Sorry, I think my last reply lacked detail !
My point was,
When you combine both statements..
U will observe, u have the following info:
N(total)
N(doctors)
N(law degree holders)


At this point if you use:
N(total) = n(docs) + n(law) - n(both)

Then u r surely gonna fall in the 'C Trap' because u will think, u have got 3 values from question and u can easily find 4th one.

But, if you had the correct formula in mind, i.e.
N(total)- neither= n(doc) +n(law) - n(both)

You will realise that, u still have two values missing. Without the 'neither' u cant find n(both).
Hence, info.is incomplete and answer is E.

So my point was, always have the formula (which involves 'neither') in your mind !

Hope I was able to put forward my part of understanding. Please correct me if my thought process is wrong.


Regards,
ashygoyal

Thanks and Regards,
ashygoyal
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2014
Posts: 79
Own Kudos [?]: 83 [0]
Given Kudos: 113
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 580 Q49 V21
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.
(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.


Solution:

Statement 1:Insufficient . No info about law degree.

Statement 2: Insufficient. No info about doctors.

Combine. We don't know the common in both. People involved in both law degree and doctor.

Therefore the answer is Option E.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2018
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 195
Location: India
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
Going to keep it small and simple.
T - N = A + B - Both
T = Total; N = Neither; A = Doctor's Degree; B = Law Degree; We need to find out The Number of people who have both the degrees (i.e..,Both)
Total = 50 (given)
Statement 1: A = 36
=> 50-N = 36+B-x ----------Not sufficient.
Statement 2: B = 18
=> 50-N = A+18-x ----------Not Sufficient.
Together, 50-N = 36+18-x
Since we still don't know the value of N, we cannot determine x
Hence, E

Kudos?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Aug 2018
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
I got this question wrong, so to clarify if the subject says : " a group of 50 doctor who have law degree", then we can apply Total = n(D) + n(L) - n(D and L) correct?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Posts: 5957
Own Kudos [?]: 13387 [0]
Given Kudos: 124
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law degree?

(1) In the group, 36 people are doctors.
(2) In the group, 18 people have a law degree.


Wanna make solving the Official Questions interesting???


Click here and solve 1000+ Official Questions with Video solutions as Timed Sectional Tests
and Dedicated Data Sufficiency (DS) Course


Answer: Option E

Video solution by GMATinsight



Get TOPICWISE: Concept Videos | Practice Qns 100+ | Official Qns 50+ | 100% Video solution CLICK HERE.
Two MUST join YouTube channels : GMATinsight (1000+ FREE Videos) and GMATclub :)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In a certain group of 50 people, how many are doctors who have a law [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderator:
Math Expert
92902 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne