It is currently 28 Jun 2017, 12:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect's

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 652
In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Feb 2004, 22:24
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:33) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

23. In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect's conviction for possession of an illegal weapon. The suspect had fled upon seeing police and subsequently discarded the illegal weapon after the police gave chase. The judge reasoned as follows: the only cause for the police giving chase was the suspect's flight; by itself, flight from the police does not create a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act; evidence collected during an illegal chase is inadmissible; therefore, the evidence in this case was inadmissible.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the judge's decision that the evidence was inadmissible?

(A) Flight from the police could create a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act as long as other significant factors are involved.

(B) People can legally flee from the police only when those people are not involved in a criminal act at the time.

(C) Police can legally give chase to a person only when the person's actions have created a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act.

(D) Flight from the police should not itself be considered a criminal act.

(E) In all cases in which a person's actions have created a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act, police can legally give chase to that person.

Last edited by kpadma on 02 Mar 2004, 12:31, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 185
Location: illinois
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Feb 2004, 23:02
IS D the answer. I am contemplating between C Or D. D is a direct quote from the passage....
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Feb 2004, 05:37
I go with C. Only C would invalidate the police's chase as illegal since there was no ground for police to chase that suspect in the first place. D is a mere restatement of the facts in the statement and does not in any way support the fact that the evidence in this case was inadmissible
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400
Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2004, 10:32
:? Not sure on this one.
(D) looks better to me,

Because (C) says Police can legally give chase to a person only when the person's actions have created a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act. Which in turn means that If a person creates reasonable suspicion (Illegal weapon) then police can chase, in turn (C) weakens the conclusion.
Same is the case with (B).
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2004, 11:01
mba wrote:
:? Not sure on this one.
If a person creates reasonable suspicion (Illegal weapon) then police can chase


In original premise: "The judge reasoned as follows: the only cause for the police giving chase was the suspect's flight; by itself, flight from the police does not create a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act"

The premise says there was no ground for suspicion, and as C says, when there is no ground, police cannot legally chase a suspect.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 652
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2004, 12:33
Yep!

The official answer is C.
Paul has provided good explanation.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 10
Re: In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect's [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2016, 05:20
I think D seems to be the right answer.
Re: In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect's   [#permalink] 11 Apr 2016, 05:20
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building tuanquang269 5 27 Jan 2017, 22:26
25 Experts publish their posts in the topic There are those who complain that municipal libraries are voodoochild 16 20 Nov 2015, 13:05
3 In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect s noboru 17 18 Jul 2014, 05:27
Experts publish their posts in the topic The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started gmatprep09 16 10 Sep 2013, 04:44
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic CR-Judges rampuria 45 02 Feb 2016, 12:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect's

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.