Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned to the pond. A few days later, 50 fish were caught again, of which 2 were found to have been tagged. If the percent of tagged fish in the second catch approximates the percent of tagged fish in the pond, what is the approximate number of fish in the pond?

Each week we'll be posting several questions from The Official Guide For GMAT® Quantitative Review, 2ND Edition and then after couple of days we'll provide Official Answer (OA) to them along with a slution.

We'll be glad if you participate in development of this project: 1. Please provide your solutions to the questions; 2. Please vote for the best solutions by pressing Kudos button; 3. Please vote for the questions themselves by pressing Kudos button; 4. Please share your views on difficulty level of the questions, so that we have most precise evaluation.

In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned to the pond. A few days later, 50 fish were caught again, of which 2 were found to have been tagged. If the percent of tagged fish in the second catch approximates the percent of tagged fish in the pond, what is the approximate number of fish in the pond?

(A) 400 (B) 625 (C) 1,250 (D) 2,500 (E) 10,000

The percent of tagged fish in the second catch is 2/50*100 = 4%.

We are told that 4% approximates the percent of tagged fish in the pond. Since there are 50 tagged fish, then we have 0.04x = 50 --> x = 1,250.

In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned to the pond. A few days later, 50 fish were caught again, of which 2 were found to have been tagged. If the percent of tagged fish in the second catch approximates the percent of tagged fish in the pond, what is the approximate number of fish in the pond?

(A) 400 (B) 625 (C) 1,250 (D) 2,500 (E) 10,000

# of fishes caught in the 2nd catch = 50 and # of fishes which are tagged = 2 so %age = 4% And after the 1st catch, the # of fish which are tagged are = 50 which is 4% of # of fishes in the pond, so total number of fishes = 25*50 = 1250 - Option C)
_________________

In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned to the pond. A few days later, 50 fish were caught again, of which 2 were found to have been tagged. If the percent of tagged fish in the second catch approximates the percent of tagged fish in the pond, what is the approximate number of fish in the pond?

(A) 400 (B) 625 (C) 1,250 (D) 2,500 (E) 10,000

The percent of tagged fish in the second catch is 2/50*100 = 4%.

We are told that 4% approximates the percent of tagged fish in the pond. Since there are 50 tagged fish, then we have 0.04x = 50 --> x = 1,250.

Re: In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jul 2015, 09:59

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jul 2016, 07:48

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Jul 2016, 11:02

Hey Bunuel i have a query in this question Here why arent we taking the number of tagged fishes as 48 as 2 fishes that were caught arent returned to the pond. we have no evidence that the two fishes were returned to the pond so (4/100)*number of fishes = 48 although no option is provided i think its answer should be 1200

Re: In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Jul 2016, 11:23

1

This post received KUDOS

stonecold wrote:

Hey Bunuel i have a query in this question Here why arent we taking the number of tagged fishes as 48 as 2 fishes that were caught arent returned to the pond. we have no evidence that the two fishes were returned to the pond so (4/100)*number of fishes = 48 although no option is provided i think its answer should be 1200

Re: In a certain pond, 50 fish were caught, tagged, and returned [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Jul 2016, 11:28

abhimahna wrote:

stonecold wrote:

Hey Bunuel i have a query in this question Here why arent we taking the number of tagged fishes as 48 as 2 fishes that were caught arent returned to the pond. we have no evidence that the two fishes were returned to the pond so (4/100)*number of fishes = 48 although no option is provided i think its answer should be 1200

True. If one of the options would have been 1200, then this could be a concern.

But I believe GMAC people are intelligent enough to avoid such options that cause confusions.

So, since we donot have any option that matches per your assumption, we need to consider 50 tagged fishes only.

Hope it clears your query!!

Nopes bruh..! I disagree . I think we are really missing something here . Abhishek009 has stopped doing quant i guess else he would have been the first one to respond on this Lets wait for Bunuel to respond
_________________

There are a few different ways to address the interpretational 'issue' that you're talking about:

To start, regardless of how you interpret the prompt, the question ultimately asks for the APPROXIMATE number of fish in the pond - your way of interpreting the question leads to the SAME correct answer. Thus, it doesn't really matter that you didn't get to 1250 exactly.

Second, IF the question expected you to calculate a result by 'ignoring' the 50 fish that were caught the second time, then it would have asked for the number of REMAINING fish in the pond (which the prompt did not do). By extension, you would have to question your interpretation of the wording (and possibly consider an alternative interpretation - which you seem to refuse to do). While minor interpretational 'biases' can sometimes happen in GMAT questions, the answer choices will be written so that there can only be one correct answer. If "your answer" isn't there, then you have to consider how you interpreted the given information and adjust your work accordingly.

Third, from a ratio standpoint, the 50 fish 'subgroup' that was caught the second time IS, mathematically speaking, part of the total number of fish in the pond (so you can't ignore that group when calculating the total number of fish in the pond).

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...