It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 11:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In a political system with only two major parties, the

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 317

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 4

Location: Washington DC
In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2008, 16:36
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.
If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?
(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2008
Posts: 97

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 May 2008, 18:22
I'm going to say B. It is the only one that can be reasonably inferred.
_________________

MBA Blog: University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management- http://unconventionalapplicant.blogspot.com/

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1881

Kudos [?]: 1399 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg

### Show Tags

16 May 2008, 19:25
marshpa wrote:
In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.
If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?
(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.

C
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1399 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 May 2008, 19:36
C is my choice. What's the OA?

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2007
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 May 2008, 19:41
Grrrr.. Should have chosen B. I can't discipline myself not to waver from what I pick first. Anyway, the OA seems B. For a better explanation of the choices, click the link below:
http://www.beatthegmat.com/cr-500-section-1-t5026.html#19526

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 317

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 4

Location: Washington DC

### Show Tags

18 May 2008, 09:34
OA is indeed B.

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 145

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 May 2008, 10:08
Comes down to B vs C.
In C there is no reason to believe that the 3rd party will not attract new voters. So C is out.
That leaves B.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

### Show Tags

18 May 2008, 17:59
Straight B for me.

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

Director
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 782

Kudos [?]: 236 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 May 2008, 18:10
I am picking D

because you have 2 parties who stand on the left and on the right side of the middle. The 3rd party is more radical than either party, meaning that it is even further left or further right. So a radical 3rd party always siphons votes from only 1 party.

Kudos [?]: 236 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-3rd Party system   [#permalink] 18 May 2008, 18:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by