Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 23:52

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In a political system with only two major parties, the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 87
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 41 [1] , given: 2

Re: CR - Political Parties [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2011, 19:15
1
KUDOS
+ 1 for B
_________________

Fight till you succeed like a gladiator..or doom your life which can be invincible

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 208
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 5

Re: CR - Political Parties [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2011, 19:51
I picked B as well. If before the third party came into the picture, the split was 50-50, then after the 3rd party came in, none of the parties will have more than 50%.
Very bad way of putting things but hey, this is CR for you!
Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 250
Schools: UNC Duke Kellogg
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 4

Re: CR - Political Parties [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2011, 18:57
Inference on the GMAT is something that is absolutely and always true...

Choice B!
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 70
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: CR - Political Parties [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2011, 05:22
B for me

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

_________________________
Try and you will succeed !

Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2010
Posts: 25
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Political Parties [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2011, 20:13
B
Manager
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 113
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Political Parties [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2011, 03:18
B for me
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 240
Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 25

Re: In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2012, 05:11
Very good question.... KUDOS from me
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 268
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 6

Re: In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2012, 05:44
This is a fun math-based problem.

Let's assume the two major parties each have 50 votes out of a total 100 votes. And we know that a third party will take some of the 50 votes of ONLY ONE of the parties leaving the votes of the other party intact. Thus, no party would (still) have more than 50% of the votes or more than 50 votes.

Cheers,
Der alte Fritz.
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

Intern
Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Posts: 6
Location: India
WE: Other (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 8

Re: In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2012, 05:46

Though I arrived at the answer through POE because none of them seemed fitting as per the facts given.

bsdlover nicely explained the answer though!
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 392
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 13

Re: In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2012, 05:57
I don't think this should be categorized as debatable OA. The answer is a clearcut B. A is close but upon close inspection, B comes out on top. This is a must be true question type.
Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 47
Location: Sydney
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 7

Re: CR - Political Parties [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2012, 19:05
I go for B, since if before the 3rd party comes into the picture, there was a 50-50 split, the third party will only get voters from only one pool. So the 50-50 split will turn into a 50-(50-X)-X split. So B, and only B can be correctly inferred

Okay, so say there are 100 voters originally, 50-50 for party A and B. Party C is introduced and 10 voters from Party B vote for Party C instead. Meanwhile party A still captures a half of the vote?!

Thus, I don't understand how C is correct?
Manager
Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Posts: 61
Location: Korea, Republic of
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 08-16-2012
GPA: 3.05
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 37

Re: In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2012, 20:10
In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.

If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?

(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.

- Wrong because the author states that the third party affects the other two candidates unequally

(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.

- Not sure at first... 'The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates'

Then, some usually means about 30% or less than a half. Therefore, this fits into the premise.

(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.

Out of scope

(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.

Out of scope

(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.

Out of scope
_________________

Luck is the additional surplus on the way to one's constant effort.

Intern
Joined: 17 Jan 2012
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 8

Re: In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2013, 17:17

The conclusion that can be inferred here is that the entrance of a third party will affect both voters unequally.

If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?

(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
There is no reference in the passage regarding the position a party takes and how it affects other parties' voters. -- incorrect
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
Correct - According to the passage, the new third party would take some votes at least, and will also bring in its own voters, hence the new tally won't allow any one party to have more the 1/2 of the votes.
(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
This is ambiguous - as we know the new party will bring its own voters - those could be voters who have not voted for anyone else before. -- incorrect
(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
Similar to A, no opinions or stance of a party is known -- incorrect
(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.
No information in the passage suggests a coalition of other party leaders -- incorrect.
Princeton Review Representative
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 161
Followers: 147

Kudos [?]: 348 [0], given: 0

Re: In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2013, 21:41
In an inference question you are looking for the thing you know to be true from the paragraph ALONE. You are not looking to add extra information or change the author's opinion in any way. a good start to these question types is to elminate answer choices that bring in new information that is not contained in the passage. In this question:

A is out becuase it directly contradicts the passage - saying the third party will pull voters equally while the passage says a third party will only pull voters from one side.
C is out becuase the passage does not discuss new voters so we can't know that for sure.
D is out becuase we don't know the nature of the political stance of a new party
E is out becuase we don't know how a third party would be founded.

This leaves B which must be true because the passage says a third party would only pull voters from one party - thus if each party started with 50% then a third party would pull some votes from one side, leaving the other side untouched. Therefore, it is unlikely one party will get more than 50%. Also notice the "mushy" wording in the word "likely" this makes it easier to prove true over an answer that says something will happen.
_________________

Special offer! Save $250 on GMAT Ultimate Classroom, GMAT Small Group Instruction, or GMAT Liveonline when you use the promo code GCVERBAL250. Or, save$150 on GMAT Self-Prep when you use the code GCVERBAL150. Enroll at www.princetonreview.com

Intern
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 33

Re: CR - Political Parties [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 23:11
Yikes!!

we all fell into the same trap & chose C

sebycb976 wrote:
In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.
If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?

A. If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
B. If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
C. A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
D. The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
E. The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.

I go for B, since if before the 3rd party comes into the picture, there was a 50-50 split, the third party will only get voters from only one pool. So the 50-50 split will turn into a 50-(50-X)-X split. So B, and only B can be correctly inferred
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10364
Followers: 999

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2014, 04:42
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10364
Followers: 999

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2016, 03:38
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In a political system with only two major parties, the   [#permalink] 25 Aug 2016, 03:38

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 37 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Hillsburgh and Nansensville are two major metropolitan areas only 50 m 8 12 Mar 2016, 12:50
14 Political scientist: As a political system 5 02 Nov 2016, 03:36
Insurgent political parties that are profoundly dissatisfied 7 28 Apr 2012, 10:28
2 In a political system with only two major parties, the 7 09 Mar 2012, 23:38
3 In a political system with only two major parties, the 11 22 Jun 2016, 11:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by