In a political system with only two major parties, the : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Feb 2017, 06:46

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In a political system with only two major parties, the

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 61
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 1

In a political system with only two major parties, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Jul 2010, 08:44
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

80% (03:04) correct 20% (02:51) wrong based on 5 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.

If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?
(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 242
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

04 Jul 2010, 09:30
EnterMatrix wrote:
In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.

If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?
(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.

The passage states that "The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate." This means that 3rd part candidates take away votes from ONE of the major candidates. The only answer that has anything to do with this is B. B states that neither of the major candidates will have a majority if the vote was originally split evenly. This means that the 3rd party candidate takes away votes from one of the major candidates, as stated above. The voters don't "switch sides" due to the presence of a 3rd party candidate.
Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 158
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 5

Show Tags

04 Jul 2010, 10:57
Normal maths..Its B.. If votes are equally divided, how can one get more than 50%
Manager
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 61
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

05 Jul 2010, 10:36
Re: Critical Reasoning   [#permalink] 05 Jul 2010, 10:36
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In a political system with only two major parties, the 1 16 Jan 2010, 15:54
2 In a political system with only two major parties, the 11 27 Jun 2009, 06:59
In a political system with only two major parties, the 3 01 Aug 2008, 08:51
In a political system with only two major parties, the 8 16 May 2008, 15:36
In a political system with only two major parties, the 2 02 May 2008, 07:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by