Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 15:55 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 15:55

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Posts: 235
Own Kudos [?]: 332 [3]
Given Kudos: 74
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Apr 2016
Posts: 209
Own Kudos [?]: 48 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2020
Posts: 89
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 286
Send PM
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Posts: 3083
Own Kudos [?]: 4076 [0]
Given Kudos: 1851
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Send PM
Re: In a spelling competition, competitors were required to spell 108 diffe [#permalink]
Statement 1: We can conclude that Q lies within U because every word that contained the letter Q also contained the letter U. Also from the statement "every word that did not contain the letter Q did contain the letter T", it can be inferred that the entire set (containing U & Q) is a subset of T.

However, its doesn't give any information on the number. Hence NOT sufficient. Option A & D ruled out.

Statement 2: Provides information about U, doesn't provide information on overlap or anything else to conclude. Hence NOT sufficient

Combining 1 & 2 - U + Q = 1/3

Therefore, T = 2/3

Thus C.

Can anyone confirm if the approach is correct ?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Feb 2021
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23
GPA: 4
Send PM
In a spelling competition, competitors were required to spell 108 diffe [#permalink]
abhishekmayank wrote:
Should not answer be A ?

We can divide the the words consisting of Q and not consisting of Q.

We need to discard the words not consisting of Q, as absence of Q marks the absence of T and we are looking for words consisting of T.

Now in the remaining set of words consisting of Q, as per the option A, U will also be part of these words. So we don't have any word with T and without U.

Number of words with T and without U = 0


abhishekmayank,

It can't be option A because we can't get a specific number as the solution. Kindly note that we are not given the number of words that contain U or T so, we can't determine the number of words with T and without U to be 0.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Posts: 235
Own Kudos [?]: 332 [0]
Given Kudos: 74
Send PM
Re: In a spelling competition, competitors were required to spell 108 diffe [#permalink]
Could anyone provide better explanation from the math.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In a spelling competition, competitors were required to spell 108 diffe [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92883 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne