GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 06 Aug 2020, 19:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In an area that is both agricultural and residential in nature, nurser

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 65831
In an area that is both agricultural and residential in nature, nurser  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2020, 02:15
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (02:18) correct 30% (02:30) wrong based on 160 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In an area that is both agricultural and residential in nature, nursery owners involved in the growing of decorative garden trees and plants complained to authorities of an average decline of approximately 25% in profits caused by a lack of water which resulted in irrigation problems, and the consequent loss of merchandise. To provide assistance to the nursery owners, the authorities plan to induce water rations upon residents in the area since if less water is used by the residents, more will be available to the nursery owners.

Which of the following points to the most serious logical flaw in the plan devised by the authorities?


(A) Since the rationing of water by residents will result in lower payments for water by residents to the authorities, the plan will most likely be detrimental to the revenue earned by the local government for such services.

(B) By punishing the residents for financial difficulties experienced by agricultural business owners, the authorities risk harming the way they are perceived by the residential population, affecting future endeavours.

(C) It is not probable that 100% of the 25% decline in the profits earned by the nursery owners was a direct result of the irrigation problems and the damage caused to the merchandise by them

(D) Because most of the residents in the area are not homeowners, but instead rent their apartments, the water rations, creating the need to save water, will give rise to the infrequent cleaning of apartments and buildings, lowering the market value of the area's residential properties.

(E) The introduction of water rationing to the area will improve the status of the nurseries' goods at the expense of the revenues they earn since, due to the need for irrigation entailed in the care of such products, residents will cease to purchase garden plants.



Project CR Butler: Critical Reasoning


For all CR butler Questions Click Here

_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Jan 2020
Posts: 5
In an area that is both agricultural and residential in nature, nurser  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2020, 03:23
2
The answer here is Option (E).

Prethinking:

Reasoning of authorities:
Current water scarcity faced by the farmers is attributed the cause of residents using more water.
If the water is rationed, the farmers will get adequate water supply and hence they will be able to raise greater number of decorative trees and plants and their profits will be increased.

What would weaken this claim provided that the water is rationed ?

--> If the water is rationed, consumption of water by the residents will decline and eventually they may no longer buy the garden plants which require water for their nourishment.


Option E: Correct

This exactly resonates with our pre-thinking.
This is the only negative aspects to the writer's view. It is in tandem with the flaw deliberately asked in the question. Hence, it is the most appropriate of the options available
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Posts: 297
Re: In an area that is both agricultural and residential in nature, nurser  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2020, 05:02
1
I had written a whole post! Where did it go. Anyway, the decision point probably comes down to (B) and (E). B is a little ambiguous, and I didn't get this when I still chose (E) I think, but since the current plan is not about protecting FUTURE ENDEAVORS it probably can be safely eliminated, too.

(E) is nice since if the Authority's plan is to help these professional gardeners, you might on the one hand be giving them more water, but on the other you will effectively make it harder for the BUYERS to water the plants in case they buy some. Why buy a plant if you know you can't water it?
_________________
For online tutoring contact: gmatknight@gmail.com - Not that active on gmatclub anymore so please message on the email address :)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
D
Joined: 01 Mar 2015
Posts: 294
Re: In an area that is both agricultural and residential in nature, nurser  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2020, 06:55
A. Incorrect as this answer choice states that the authorities will earn less if the plan is executed. This is irrelevant, because the plan aims to help the nursery owners, not to avoid spending money.

B. Incorrect as this answer choice introduces a negative side-effect of the plan - residents might react badly to it, losing respect for the authorities. Still, this potential negative side-effect does not mean that the plan will not work.

C. Incorrect as we have no data that would lead us to believe the 25% figure is incorrect or improbable.

D. Incorrect as this answer choice highlights a negative outcome of the plan. However, the authorities aim at helping the nursery owners.

E. Correct as this answer choice tells us that the rationing could also directly affect the revenues earned by the nursery owners.

Hence, OA is (E).
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 23 Feb 2019
Posts: 71
Re: In an area that is both agricultural and residential in nature, nurser  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2020, 20:26
1
IMO E,

(A) Since the rationing of water by residents will result in lower payments for water by residents to the authorities, the plan will most likely be detrimental to the revenue earned by the local government for such services.
OFS- The plan is probably detrimental to the Local government but can't be claimed as a flaw. Hence eliminated.


(B) By punishing the residents for financial difficulties experienced by agricultural business owners, the authorities risk harming the way they are perceived by the residential population, affecting future endeavours.
Even if it is true, the nursery owners are going to get benefit. Hence there is no flaw in this option. Hence eliminated


(C) It is not probable that 100% of the 25% decline in the profits earned by the nursery owners was a direct result of the irrigation problems and the damage caused to the merchandise by them
OFS- Completely deviating from the argument. Hence eliminated.


(D) Because most of the residents in the area are not homeowners, but instead rent their apartments, the water rations, creating the need to save water, will give rise to the infrequent cleaning of apartments and buildings, lowering the market value of the area's residential properties.
So what ? Anyways nursery owners will be benefited. This option is not a flawed one. Hence eliminated


(E) The introduction of water rationing to the area will improve the status of the nurseries' goods at the expense of the revenues they earn since, due to the need for irrigation entailed in the care of such products, residents will cease to purchase garden plants
Correct Answer - This option explains the flaw that once the plan is implemented, There is going to be a backfire to the nursery owners.
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 65831
In an area that is both agricultural and residential in nature, nurser  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2020, 01:35

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



In an area that is both agricultural and residential in nature, nursery owners involved in the growing of decorative garden trees and plants complained to authorities of an average decline of approximately 25% in profits caused by a lack of water which resulted in irrigation problems, and the consequent loss of merchandise. To provide assistance to the nursery owners, the authorities plan to induce water rations upon residents in the area since if less water is used by the residents, more will be available to the nursery owners.

Which of the following points to the most serious logical flaw in the plan devised by the authorities?



(A) Since the rationing of water by residents will result in lower payments for water by residents to the authorities, the plan will most likely be detrimental to the revenue earned by the local government for such services.

Incorrect.

This answer choice states that the authorities will earn less if the plan is executed. This is irrelevant, because the plan aims to help the nursery owners, not to avoid spending money. The fact the plan may cost the government money doesn't mean that it will not be successful in helping the nursery owners.

Remember, this is not a Conclusion Weakening question where any possible negative aspect of the plan will do; here you are asked to locate an inherent (existing) flaw in the plan, i.e., a reason why the plan will not achieve what it set out to do.



(B) By punishing the residents for financial difficulties experienced by agricultural business owners, the authorities risk harming the way they are perceived by the residential population, affecting future endeavours.

Incorrect.

This answer choice introduces a negative side-effect of the plan - residents might react badly to it, losing respect for the authorities. Still, this potential negative side-effect does not mean that the plan will not work.



(C) It is not probable that 100% of the 25% decline in the profits earned by the nursery owners was a direct result of the irrigation problems and the damage caused to the merchandise by them

Incorrect.

We have no data that would lead us to believe the 25% figure is incorrect or improbable. Technically, irrigation problems could cause a nursery to lose all its plants, so there is nothing illogical here.

Notice that unlike Conclusion Weakening, you are not required to choose new data that undermines the conclusion - you are required to find the answer choice which best reflects the flaw already apparent in the plan.



(D) Because most of the residents in the area are not homeowners, but instead rent their apartments, the water rations, creating the need to save water, will give rise to the infrequent cleaning of apartments and buildings, lowering the market value of the area's residential properties.

Incorrect.

This answer choice highlights a negative outcome of the plan. However, the authorities aim at helping the nursery owners. Therefore, even if property values drop, the plan could still be thought of as effective.



(E) The introduction of water rationing to the area will improve the status of the nurseries' goods at the expense of the revenues they earn since, due to the need for irrigation entailed in the care of such products, residents will cease to purchase garden plants.

This answer choice tells us that the rationing could also directly affect the revenues earned by the nursery owners. If residents need to cut down on water usage, they will probably stop watering their gardens, and even more likely, not want to purchase additional plants.


_________________
GMAT Club Bot
In an area that is both agricultural and residential in nature, nurser   [#permalink] 14 Jul 2020, 01:35

In an area that is both agricultural and residential in nature, nurser

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne