Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 02:36 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 02:36

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 May 2020
Posts: 136
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.2
Send PM
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4347
Own Kudos [?]: 30790 [1]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2020
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Location: Taiwan
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 2.44
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 778
Own Kudos [?]: 396 [0]
Given Kudos: 2198
Send PM
Re: In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purifi [#permalink]
okdongdong wrote:
In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purification method, the company required each employee to sign a confidentiality agreement prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies using an analogous purification process.


(A) prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies

(B) prohibiting them from the disclosing of its water purification methods to any company

(C) prohibiting disclosure of its water purification methods to any company

(D) that would prohibit them from disclosure of its water purification methods to companies

(E) that would prohibit its water purification methods to be disclosed to a company


the idiom is
prohibit somebody from DOING.
we need "doing". not noun for this idiom. doing refer to the noun after "prohibit".

"the disclosing" is not right. in dictionary, there is no word "disclosing", but there is the noun "learning". why
"learning" , though looking like a participle/gerund, is a pure noun such as disclosure or action.

a pure noun can go with "the". "the learning" is correct.

"disclosing' appear in a sentence because it is a participle or gerund. participle is a form of doing which has some but not all features of adjective and gerund is a form of doing which has some but not all some feature of noun. gerund ,not having all feature of a noun , can not go after article "the".

frankly, I wish you to review this point in grammar books. find a good books because most grammar book dont explain enough about this point while gmat test this point frequently because this point is basic.

"the disclosing" is wrong because "disclosing" is not a pure noun and, so, can not go with "the"

in " prohibit somebody from doing ", "doing" is participle refering to somebody .
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 368
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 530
Send PM
Re: In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purifi [#permalink]
CrackVerbalGMAT wrote:
DonnieDrastic wrote:
I thought that prohibit was followed up with "from" whereas forbid was followed up with "to"


When you say "prohibit from", the correct form of the idiom is -

"prohibit someone/something from something"

For example -
The court ordered the Bureau of Immigration to prohibit the accused from leaving the country.

Another way in which "prohibit" can be used is "prohibit something"

For example -
Kuwait was the only nation to prohibit the entry of Syrian nationals prior to Trump's executive action
Reddit's rules strictly prohibit revealing anybody's private personal information (Note here that "revealing ..." is a noun).

Let us look at the answer options -

Option A - Incorrect.
"prohibiting that its water purification methods be disclosed to companies" - Note that "prohibit" does not take the command subjunctive.

Option B - Incorrect.
"them" is incorrect. "each employee" is singular.

Option C - Correct.
This uses the second form of the idiom - "prohibit X"
X = the noun phrase "disclosure of its water purification methods to any company"

Option D - Incorrect.
"that would prohibit them from disclosure of its water purification methods to companies"

"them" is incorrect as "each employee" requires a singular pronoun.
"prohibit X from doing Y" is the correct idiom. "disclosing" should be used instead of "disclosure".
"would prohibit" - uses future in the past form "would". Implies that prohibition occurs some time after "signing". Illogical. Employees are prohibited from disclosing information as soon as they sign the agreement.

Option E - Incorrect.
Note that "prohibit + infinitive (to + Verb)" is not idiomatic.
"that would prohibit" is incorrect.

Hope this helps


But we have "required" in (A) that would take "subjunctive"?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Dec 2021
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purifi [#permalink]
We need an adjective phrase that modifies the word 'agreement'.
The present participle phrase 'prohobiting...' modifies its precedence 'agreement' .
Besides, C is not redundant.
Therefore, Option C is the correct answer.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2020
Posts: 101
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Re: In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purifi [#permalink]
Hi Experts, KarishmaB

are options D & E incorrect because, as per the meaning of the sentence, the agreements were prohibiting at that time and thus we don't require the conditional tense "would".

Thanks
Kitty
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [1]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purifi [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
KittyDoodles

You have a point. Normally, you'd only use this kind of construction if the prohibition happened later. For instance, we say things like "She wrote a book that would serve as an influence on several generations of journalists." However, we can also use "would" if we are emphasizing the (known) future effects: "In order to keep his job, he had to sign an agreement that would prevent him from receiving overtime pay." That doesn't seem like what we want in the original sentence, but I'd say the idiom problems with the use of "prohibit" are the most compelling reasons to cut D/E. (See the Most Helpful Reply by CrackverbalGMAT.)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In an attempt to guarantee the security of its innovative water purifi [#permalink]
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne