It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 07:52

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2008, 17:54
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:39) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 5 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 175

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2008, 18:11
C???

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 4

Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2008, 00:14
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

The assumption is that prisoners who take college level courses commit less crimes after being released BECAUSE they took college level courses.

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed. Opposite of Q
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population. Doesn't help
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released. Correct. Attributes lack of repeat crime to inmate himself NOT the college course. Therefore (not) taking the courses will not impact repeat crime rate
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does. irrelevant
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime. out of scope and irrelevant

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 4

Director
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 726

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2008, 00:56
x97agarwal wrote:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

C.

since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

This part of the passage clearly assumes that the courses were the only factor that made the inmates to do fewer crimes.
But there are chances that the same guys were doing fewer crimes before getting arrested. Argument assumes that this was not the case.

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 3

Location: Hungary
Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2008, 03:20
I agree with C.

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 3

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2008, 06:29
Sorry OA is none of the above.

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 3

Location: Hungary
Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2008, 06:41
My second tought is A.

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 3

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 3

Location: Hungary
Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2008, 06:45
Conclusion: this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal

Negate A: Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is likely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed

The conclusion fall apart.

It is difficult to see in 2 min.

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 3

Director
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 514

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Schools: Wharton
Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2008, 09:11
x97agarwal wrote:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

A?

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 429

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2008, 01:28
x97agarwal wrote:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

IMO C)

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 193

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2008, 20:48
it is apparent the A and C are the choices in contention

C) The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released. the conclusion is college level courses are really doing good to prisoners what this does is it weakens the argument applying negation test this does ntg to the conclusion

A) Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.applying negation test to this one "being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed" conclusion cannpot be drawn

hence A

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1374

Kudos [?]: 423 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2008, 22:07
x97agarwal wrote:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released. -> this is a valid assumption negate this argument falls apart -> if the group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released. then doing college level courses will not have any effect on crimes commited by them once releasd hence the argument saying steps taken by governor counters his ultimate goal will be wrong.Hence this assumtion is necessary
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Kudos [?]: 423 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1374

Kudos [?]: 423 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2008, 22:13
spriya wrote:
x97agarwal wrote:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed. -> this is opposite of whats required by the argument.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.-> irrelevant
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released. -> this is a valid assumption negate this argument falls apart -> if the group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released. then doing college level courses will not have any effect on crimes commited by them once releasd hence the argument saying steps taken by governor counters his ultimate goal will be wrong.Hence this assumtion is necessary
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does. -> irrelevant
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime. -> OOS

_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Kudos [?]: 423 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 232

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2008, 03:05
BOth A and C are possible answers. How do you know which is correct? I'm torn between these two choices

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 429

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2008, 04:42
x97agarwal wrote:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

IMO B)

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 1

Director
Status: No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 609

Kudos [?]: 1154 [0], given: 39

Re: CR: Criminals and classes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2011, 04:38
nmohindru wrote:
x97agarwal wrote:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

IMO B)

It should be C
_________________

Collections:-
PSof OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ps-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110005.html
DS of OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ds-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110004.html
100 GMAT PREP Quantitative collection http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-problem-collections-114358.html
Collections of work/rate problems with solutions http://gmatclub.com/forum/collections-of-work-rate-problem-with-solutions-118919.html
Mixture problems in a file with best solutions: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mixture-problems-with-best-and-easy-solutions-all-together-124644.html

Kudos [?]: 1154 [0], given: 39

Director
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 518

Kudos [?]: 304 [0], given: 16

Location: United States
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Re: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2011, 04:58
will go with A, if anyone has doubt please negate the option check and see if conclusion falls apart, if you negate it doesn't effect the conclusion
_________________

Kudos [?]: 304 [0], given: 16

Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 6

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Re: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2011, 07:44
We need to make governor convince that stopping collage level course will not deter criminal from committing crime, but will defiantly harm the chances of repeat crime

So A ) it is

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 6

Re: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is   [#permalink] 26 Dec 2011, 07:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.