In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Feb 2017, 03:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 332
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2007, 04:53
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers
made pie dough together using rolling pins and other
utensils. Each father-son pair used a rolling pin that
was distinctively different from those used by the
other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the
phrase “rolling pin” each time his son used it. But
when the children were asked to identify all of the
rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that
included several rolling pins, each child picked only
the one that he had used.
Which one of the following inferences is most
supported by the information above?
(A) The children did not grasp the function of a
rolling pin.
(B) No two children understood the name “rolling
pin” to apply to the same object.
(C) The children understood that all rolling pins
have the same general shape.
(D) Each child was able to identify correctly only
the utensils that he had used.
(E) The children were not able to distinguish the
rolling pins they used from other rolling pins.
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 306
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2007, 05:33
down to D&B. I choose D. Methodof elimination
Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 170
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2007, 06:02
I'll go with B.

Although the passage says that the children and fathers used rolling pins and other utensils, the experiment findings only focused on the rolling pins. Nothing is said about the other utensils, so and inference based on the other utensils cant be correct. So D is out.
VP
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1443
Schools: Chicago Booth '11
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2007, 07:17
im with B

You can infer that the children only thought their object was a rolling pin, because that was the name of the object.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 332
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2007, 22:34
OA - B.

Thanks
02 Jul 2007, 22:34
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 *700* In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers 5 11 Apr 2015, 22:02
4 Although fullerenes—spherical molecules made 3 27 Nov 2014, 20:16
5 CR Made Easy 1 09 Jun 2013, 10:25
8 In an experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made 20 01 Mar 2009, 21:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by