Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 25 Mar 2017, 10:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Location: Zapopan Mexico
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 7

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2012, 15:36
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

71% (03:16) correct 29% (03:58) wrong based on 166 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

34. In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.
a) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers
b) were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated
c) published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
d) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
e) on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers

Could someone explain me, why is answer C wrong. Additionally, could you explain the important differences between answer C and D. I believe the difference is the idiom "published on" or "published about" but not sure.
Best regards.

FYI I´m amazed with the book GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR, I bought it and it´s great. I´ve read it all and I found only 2 cons.
1 There is no explanation for the answers.
2 some orthographic mistakes (most of them irrelevant to the context).
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 181
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 20

Re: Practice Test 1 Q. 34 GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR GMAT CLUB [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2012, 16:26
hero4th wrote:
34. In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.
a) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers
b) were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated
c) published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
d) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
e) on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers

Could someone explain me, why is answer C wrong. Additionally, could you explain the important differences between answer C and D. I believe the difference is the idiom "published on" or "published about" but not sure.
Best regards.

FYI I´m amazed with the book GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR, I bought it and it´s great. I´ve read it all and I found only 2 cons.
1 There is no explanation for the answers.
2 some orthographic mistakes (most of them irrelevant to the context).

Close call between A and D. Winner is D.
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 367
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 170 [2] , given: 31

Re: Practice Test 1 Q. 34 GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR GMAT CLUB [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2012, 00:25
2
KUDOS
In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

a) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers
--> it changes the meaning severely conveying that stone points are excavating something from the layers--> nuisance meaning

b) were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated

c) published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
--> no verb here sentence incorrect better say fragment.

d) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
--> CORRECT it conserves the meaning

e) on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers
--> changes the meaning

D is the best one.

HTH
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Posts: 94
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 42

Re: Practice Test 1 Q. 34 GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR GMAT CLUB [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Apr 2012, 12:03
riteshv wrote:
What's wrong with A

ditto. Since I'm not familiar with the subject matter, neither A or D sounds "right" to me.

i don't know if excavating is an active process or it happened in the past from the sentence.
Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2010
Posts: 42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 2

Re: Practice Test 1 Q. 34 GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR GMAT CLUB [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2012, 05:49
hero4th wrote:
34. In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.
a) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers
b) were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated
c) published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
d) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
e) on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers

Could someone explain me, why is answer C wrong. Additionally, could you explain the important differences between answer C and D. I believe the difference is the idiom "published on" or "published about" but not sure.
Best regards.

FYI I´m amazed with the book GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR, I bought it and it´s great. I´ve read it all and I found only 2 cons.
1 There is no explanation for the answers.
2 some orthographic mistakes (most of them irrelevant to the context).

Ans Exp

first we should get that subject is singular report so the verb must also be in singular so the actual sentence correctly uses the helping verb but excavating is used for continuous tense as the question is about past so eliminate A on this basis then we are left with b,c,d,e and we can eliminate b because it uses wrong verb were for singular report so we have c,d,e, as c uses' published about' so which makes it wrong, about is used only to describe some thing, so here the report is not describing about stone projectile it's just providing information so eliminate c on this basis, then we are left with d and e we can take d as correct answer because is uses correct verb 'was' and past tense of word excavated so we are left with e Makes total mockery with no correct meaning so eliminate e .

Answer Option is d ,hope it's clear.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2034
Followers: 2150

Kudos [?]: 7463 [2] , given: 281

Re: Practice Test 1 Q. 34 GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR GMAT CLUB [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2012, 06:42
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi All,

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points. These points date back 64,000 years and have been excavated from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

The verb-ing modifier “excavating” has been placed right after “64,000 years” without any comma preceding it. This means that this modifier is referring to “64,000 years”. This is absolutely illogical because now the sentence suggests that “64,000 years” did the action of excavating. This is the only error in the sentence. Now let’s run the POE to find the correct answer.

POE:

Choice A: Incorrect. Modifier error as discussed above.

Choice B: were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated: Incorrect. Firstly, this choice has subject verb number agreement error. Singular “a report” cannot have plural verb “were published”. Secondly, change in the placement of “layers” makes the sentence illogical.

Choice C: published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers: Incorrect. Absence of “was” before “published” turns the sentence into active voice. The sentence now suggests that “a report” did the action of publishing about “stone projectile points”. However, the facts are published in a report. A report does not do the job of publishing.

Choice D: was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers. Correct. This choice turns “excavating” to “excavated” that refers to “stone projectile points”. This means that these points were excavated in South Africa.

Choice E: on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers: Incorrect. “published about layers” suggests that some facts were published about the layers. This choice has an illogical meaning.

PS @hero4th: Please read the explanation of Choices C and D to find the difference between the two. Here it is voice issue rather than the idiom.

1. A verb-ing modifier modifies the immediate preceding noun if the modifier is not preceded by a comma.
2. We must use correct voice to convey the logical intended meaning of the sentence.
3. Notice the change in placements of words as they may change the meaning of the sentence.

Hope this helps.

Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 247
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q50 V19
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V28
GMAT 3: 690 Q50 V34
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 93

Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2014, 21:38
"...........the report was published on stone projectile points...........". How can a report publish on stone projectile points at all? Shouldn't it be" the report on stone projectile points was published"

Where am I getting wrong?

egmat wrote:
Hi All,

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points. These points date back 64,000 years and have been excavated from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

The verb-ing modifier “excavating” has been placed right after “64,000 years” without any comma preceding it. This means that this modifier is referring to “64,000 years”. This is absolutely illogical because now the sentence suggests that “64,000 years” did the action of excavating. This is the only error in the sentence. Now let’s run the POE to find the correct answer.

POE:

Choice A: Incorrect. Modifier error as discussed above.

Choice B: were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated: Incorrect. Firstly, this choice has subject verb number agreement error. Singular “a report” cannot have plural verb “were published”. Secondly, change in the placement of “layers” makes the sentence illogical.

Choice C: published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers: Incorrect. Absence of “was” before “published” turns the sentence into active voice. The sentence now suggests that “a report” did the action of publishing about “stone projectile points”. However, the facts are published in a report. A report does not do the job of publishing.

Choice D: was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers. Correct. This choice turns “excavating” to “excavated” that refers to “stone projectile points”. This means that these points were excavated in South Africa.

Choice E: on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers: Incorrect. “published about layers” suggests that some facts were published about the layers. This choice has an illogical meaning.

PS @hero4th: Please read the explanation of Choices C and D to find the difference between the two. Here it is voice issue rather than the idiom.

1. A verb-ing modifier modifies the immediate preceding noun if the modifier is not preceded by a comma.
2. We must use correct voice to convey the logical intended meaning of the sentence.
3. Notice the change in placements of words as they may change the meaning of the sentence.

Hope this helps.

Thanks.

_________________

Middle of nowhere!

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10672
Followers: 957

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2016, 19:21
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile   [#permalink] 21 May 2016, 19:21
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
A recently published report indicates that the salaries of t 0 25 Mar 2014, 05:01
7 NASA recently published a report cautioning that many of the 11 07 Sep 2010, 05:31
22 A recently published report indicates that the salaries of 28 25 Aug 2010, 16:25
2 OG - quarried stone 7 23 Mar 2010, 08:48
A recently published report indicates that the salaries of 5 28 Oct 2008, 04:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by