GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 18 Jan 2020, 05:10

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2934
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 May 2018, 14:05
aviejay wrote:
I get confused with whether a plural verb should be used or a singular in these kind of sentences.
Here "limit" has been used for "the kind of fierce intercolony struggles". But should'nt "limits" be used as the noun is "the kind of fierce...", which is singular? Here "fierce intercolony struggles" have been bundled into a single entity which has been refered to using "the kind of fierce..."

Can you please explain with some examples?

Hello aviejay,

I am not if you still have this doubt. Here is the explanation nonetheless.

Whenever we have the structure X of Y that + verb, the number of the verb will be decided by whether that modifies X or Y.

Now, the modification of that will depend upon the context of the sentence. We need to assess whether it makes sense for that to modify X or Y.

So let's apply this test on this official sentence. From the context of this sentence, we can understand that the noun modifier that modifies the immediate preceding noun struggles because the struggles limit the spread of the said species in Argentina.

It does not make sense to say that some kind limits the spread of the said species in Argentina.

Hence, the context helps us decide the logical meaning through logical modification. This logical modification helps us decide the correct number of verb.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2018
Posts: 168
Concentration: Technology, Nonprofit
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
WE: Analyst (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2018, 21:52
We can eliminate choice A and B since they use "due to".

In choice C, D, and E, C & E make the mistake of calling a bunch of the ant's fellow a close relative.

Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 115
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Operations
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2018, 10:40
siddreal wrote:
daagh wrote:
This is a good question, because one can learn the psyche of GMAT through this. Is this a GPREP question? If it is so, it seals any doubt that we have regarding the use of ‘consider to be’ as an authenticated idiom. If GPREP prefers to use ‘consider to be’ in all the five choices or even in its OA, then we must take it. However, who can confirm, that this is indeed a GPREP or official question? ‘Outside GMAT domain, ‘consider to be’ is accepted all over the world, but that may be irrelevant to us in GMAT.

Therefore, D springs to life once again. In B, the version drops out the phrase ‘to one another’ which is essential to point out that the comparison is extended to all the ants in Argentina and not limited to two of them or two species of them.

This wobbly question changes track often from singular in the beginning to plural in the middle and then back to singular in the end. If it is a genuine GPREP or official question, it is a beautiful one. If not, it is a dubious one.

daagh This is a question from OFFICIAL GMAT GUIDE 2018. I eliminated all answer choices one by one because of the IDIOM ERROR " Consider......to be ......", which as told to us is wrong, only to realize later that all the answers have same error in idiom (or not).

Best catch in this problem is:
"fellows to be a close relative" vs "fellows to be close relatives"

the 2nd one is the correct choice and only option D has that.

======Hit +1 KUDOS if that helped pls======================
Intern
Joined: 27 Nov 2017
Posts: 17
Location: United States (CA)
Schools: Sloan '22
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2018, 01:10
The struggles is a singular entity,
so shouldn't the limits that come after
struggles that limits/ struggles that limit agree on number. I thought struggle is singular so limits should be used and hence c.
Manager
Joined: 13 May 2017
Posts: 122
Location: Finland
Concentration: Accounting, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 530 Q42 V22
GMAT 2: 570 Q36 V31
GMAT 3: 600 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.14
WE: Account Management (Entertainment and Sports)
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2018, 04:44
aviejay wrote:
I get confused with whether a plural verb should be used or a singular in these kind of sentences.
Here "limit" has been used for "the kind of fierce intercolony struggles". But should'nt "limits" be used as the noun is "the kind of fierce...", which is singular? Here "fierce intercolony struggles" have been bundled into a single entity which has been refered to using "the kind of fierce..."

Can you please explain with some examples?

Hi,

Maybe, as per the meaning, THAT modifies fierce intercolony struggles, not the kind of.. part of the phrase?

Can someone please clarify how 'type of noun' and 'kind of noun' phrases work?

type of newspapers that clarify/ clarifies?
types of newspaper that clarify/clarifies?

R
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutors
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 3090
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2018, 19:58
3
1
rencsee wrote:
aviejay wrote:
I get confused with whether a plural verb should be used or a singular in these kind of sentences.
Here "limit" has been used for "the kind of fierce intercolony struggles". But should'nt "limits" be used as the noun is "the kind of fierce...", which is singular? Here "fierce intercolony struggles" have been bundled into a single entity which has been refered to using "the kind of fierce..."

Can you please explain with some examples?

Hi,

Maybe, as per the meaning, THAT modifies fierce intercolony struggles, not the kind of.. part of the phrase?

Can someone please clarify how 'type of noun' and 'kind of noun' phrases work?

type of newspapers that clarify/ clarifies?
types of newspaper that clarify/clarifies?

R

Excellent question! When we have this kind of construction, there's no universal rule dictating what the relative pronoun refers to. In other words, if I saw a phrase such as, "The box of raisins that..." I don't know if "that" is referring to "raisins" or "box" without using additional context.

If we had "The box of raisins that has a hole in the flap where my feral infant chewed through the packaging..." we'd note two things. First, the verb "has" indicates that the antecedent for "that" should be singular. The closest preceding singular noun is "box." Next, we'd see that it makes perfect sense for a box to have a hole in the flap. Seems okay.

If we'd had "The box of raisins that have a hole in the flap where my feral infant chewed through the packaging.." we'd perform the same analysis. "Have" would be associated with a plural subject, so "that" would refer to "raisins." However, it wouldn't make sense to for raisins to have a flap or packaging, so we've got a mistake.

Now, consider another example: "The box of raisins that bear an unfortunate resemblance to rabbit droppings..." the verb "bear" would indicate a plural subject and antecedent, again leading us to "raisins." But this time, it's logical for raisins to resemble rabbit droppings. (In fact, it would be weird to find raisins that didn't!) So this sentence is fine.

To summarize, this isn't strictly a grammar issue, it's a logic and context issue. Use the verb associated with "that" to determine whether the antecedent is singular or plural. Once you've identified the antecedent, ask yourself if the antecedent makes sense. There's no getting around it. You're going to have to do some thinking on this test.

I hope that helps!
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: all videos by topic

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Intern
Joined: 09 Jan 2018
Posts: 13
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2018, 07:53
1
seekmba wrote:
I was hung up in this sentence because I thought the sentence has "this species" and "its" (which is singular ) in non-underlined part and hence we need singular subject in the underlined part as well. (big mistake on my part).

The "its" in the end of the sentence refers to "this species" and the subject of this phrase is 'struggles'......struggles that limits the spread of this species in its native Argentina

"considers to be" which is present in all options seems really awkward to me. "consider to be" or 'consider as" is a big no-no in GMAT.

In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has allowed the species to spread widely; due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

A) due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits - we need 'limit' because 'struggles' is plural. Also we need 'Because' in the beginning of the sentence.

B) due to its being so genetically similar the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit - 'it' cannot be genetically similar to itself. 'being' is not accepted. we need 'Because' in the beginning of the sentence

C) because it is so genetically similar, the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits - 'it' cannot be genetically similar to itself. we need 'limit' because 'struggles' is plural

D) because they are so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit - CORRECT

E) because of being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits - same as A

When will be uses of 'Being' correct?
Retired Moderator
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5274
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 19 Dec 2018, 12:43
Top Contributor
1
In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has allowed the species to spread widely; due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce inter-colony struggles that limits the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

(A) due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce inter-colony struggles that limits -- being as a modifier is wrong

(B) due to its being so genetically similar the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce inter-colony struggles that limit --being as a modifier is wrong

(C) because it is so genetically similar, the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce inter-colony struggles that limits--- struggles that limits -- basic S-V mismatch

(D) because they are so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce inter-colony struggles that limit-- No being; no SV mismatch; "ants and close relatives" is ok - The best choice

(E) because of being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce inter-colony struggles that limits -- being is wrong

If one were to get this question in the exam, all one has to do is to kick out, A, B, and E for their inappropriate use of 'being' as a modifier. Then, between C and D, 'struggles that limits' disqualifies C. D is the choice all the way. No need to scratch the scalp.
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't pole-vault above 630, spare 30 hours and you can fly on top.
"Winners never quit and quitters never win". (+919884544509), <newnaren@gmail.com>

Originally posted by daagh on 03 Sep 2018, 08:39.
Last edited by daagh on 19 Dec 2018, 12:43, edited 1 time in total.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutors
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 3090
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2018, 09:35
smmunna wrote:
When will be uses of 'Being' correct?

_________________
GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: all videos by topic

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Intern
Status: All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them
Joined: 03 Jul 2015
Posts: 32
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Finance
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2018, 10:46
Only one catch to eliminate 4 options-> use of 'close relative' in all wrong choices.

Didn't notice it in my timed attempt of this question.
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 111
GMAT 1: 570 Q39 V41
GMAT 2: 640 Q38 V31
GMAT 3: 650 Q42 V38
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 570 Q31 V38
GPA: 3.75
In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2018, 19:07
Am I the only one who is off put by a shift in scope that alters the meaning of sentence? (C) "because it is so genetically similar, the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits." So the Argentine Ant has spread because of a lack of genetic variation. We are then told that this is because members of the species(due to their being so genetically similar) views other members as cousins and thus intercolony struggles don't happen. However in C it shifts the scope to The Ant as in all species of ants? Is it logical that I am interpreting the answer choice in this way?. So the Argentine ant has spread because of lack of genetic variation. This is because The Ant- all species of ant? view each other as cousins. It should be the argentine Ant, or the sentence should describe members of this group using plural Ants, but the argentine ant has not in particular spread because all ants view other ants as cousins right? I know that C is still wrong because of the sneaky "struggles that limits', however is this something I should look for in the future, or am I over analyzing?
Retired Moderator
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5274
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2018, 22:41
1
Top Contributor
In my strong opinion, if you have already found out even a small but strong error in the choice, it is enough to reject it and bother about things in the question. because the maxim is that one percent poison in GMAT is 100 percent untouchable.
What happens if all other doubtful things turn out to be correct in C but the struggles that limits still remains? Can we still choose it? The S-V mismatch is a Himalayan blunder and not a small one.
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't pole-vault above 630, spare 30 hours and you can fly on top.
"Winners never quit and quitters never win". (+919884544509), <newnaren@gmail.com>
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 820
In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 02 Apr 2019, 10:25
3
Hello Everyone!

Let's take a closer look at this question to figure out the best course of action! First, here is the original question with the major differences between the options highlighted in orange:

In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has allowed the species to spread widely; due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

(A) due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits
(B) due to its being so genetically similar the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit
(C) because it is so genetically similar, the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits
(D) because they are so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit
(E) because of being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits

After a quick glance over the options, a few key differences jump out:

1. due to their being / due to its being / because it is / because they are / because of being
2. a close relative / close relatives
3. that limit / that limits

Since all of the options for #1 are different, it will be hard to eliminate more than one at a time. With options 2 & 3, we can eliminate several at once, so let's start with one of these. We'll start with #3 on our list (limit/limits) because it's an issue of subject-verb agreement, which should be pretty easy to handle quickly.

To determine which verb we need, we must first figure out what this verb is referring to. What is causing the spread of the species to be limited? The intercolony struggles. Since "struggles" is a plural word, we now know that we need a plural verb to go with it. Let's see how each option breaks down:

(A) due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits
(B) due to its being so genetically similar the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit
(C) because it is so genetically similar, the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits
(D) because they are so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit
(E) because of being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits

We can eliminate options A, C, and E because they use the singular "limits" with a plural subject "struggles."

See - that was quick! Now we're only left with 2 options, so let's move on to #2 on our list: a close relative / close relatives. The key here is to look for the words "all of" or "each of" to figure out which one we need here:

consider all of X to be Y = plural noun for Y (I consider all of my friends to be brothers.)
consider each of X to be Y = singular noun for Y (I consider each of my sisters to be a friend.)

(B) due to its being so genetically similar the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit

This is INCORRECT because the idiom structure doesn't agree in number. Whenever we refer to "all of" something, we need to use a plural to match. In this case, it uses the singular "a close relative," which is singular.

(D) because they are so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit

This is CORRECT! It uses the proper subject-verb agreement with "limit," and the use of the plural "relatives" agrees with the plural "all their fellows."

There you have it - option D is the correct choice! If you were to tackle #1 on our list first, it would have taken much longer to narrow down your options. Finding the "either this or that" problems will help you eliminate 2-3 options at once, which is much faster!

Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________
"Students study. GMAT assassins train."

The Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+

souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★
ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★

Originally posted by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 19 Dec 2018, 12:08.
Last edited by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 02 Apr 2019, 10:25, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 111
GMAT 1: 570 Q39 V41
GMAT 2: 640 Q38 V31
GMAT 3: 650 Q42 V38
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 570 Q31 V38
GPA: 3.75
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Dec 2018, 13:38
EMPOWERgmatVerbal wrote:
Hello Everyone!

Let's take a closer look at this question to figure out the best course of action! First, here is the original question with the major differences between the options highlighted in orange:

In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has allowed the species to spread widely; due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

(A) due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits
(B) due to its being so genetically similar the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit
(C) because it is so genetically similar, the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits
(D) because they are so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit
(E) because of being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits

After a quick glance over the options, a few key differences jump out:

1. due to their being / due to its being / because it is / because they are / because of being
2. a close relative / close relatives
3. that limit / that limits

Since all of the options for #1 are different, it will be hard to eliminate more than one at a time. With options 2 & 3, we can eliminate several at once, so let's start with one of these. We'll start with #3 on our list (limit/limits) because it's an issue of subject-verb agreement, which should be pretty easy to handle quickly.

To determine which verb we need, we must first figure out what this verb is referring to. What is causing the spread of the species to be limited? The intercolony struggles. Since "struggles" is a plural word, we now know that we need a plural verb to go with it. Let's see how each option breaks down:

(A) due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits
(B) due to its being so genetically similar the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit
(C) because it is so genetically similar, the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits
(D) because they are so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit
(E) because of being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits

We can eliminate options A, C, and E because they use the singular "limits" with a plural subject "struggles."

See - that was quick! Now we're only left with 2 options, so let's move on to #2 on our list: a close relative / close relatives. The key here is to look for the words "all of" or "each of" to figure out which one we need here:

consider all of X to be Y = plural noun for Y (I consider all of my friends to be brothers.)
consider each of X to be Y = singular noun for Y (I consider each of my sisters to be a friend.)

(B) due to its being so genetically similar the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit

This is INCORRECT because the idiom structure doesn't agree in number. Whenever we refer to "all of" something, we need to use a plural to match. In this case, it uses the singular "a close relative," which is singular.

(D) because they are so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit

This is CORRECT! It uses the proper subject-verb agreement with "limit," and the use of the plural "relatives" agrees with the plural "all their fellows."

There you have it - option D is the correct choice! If you were to tackle #1 on our list first, it would have taken much longer to narrow down your options. Finding the "either this or that" problems will help you eliminate 2-3 options at once, which is much faster!

Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.

Thank you so much for explanation. Empower subscriber here. Something I have been realizing lately, as you have inferred here, is that reading for meaning is a lot easier, if you can try to eliminate some answer choices due to grammar/parallelism/etc first. I am going to try to do that going forward
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Posts: 314
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2019, 00:11
In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has allowed the species to spread widely; due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

What does its refer to here?
CEO
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 3064
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2019, 04:58
darshak1 wrote:
In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has allowed the species to spread widely; due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

What does its refer to here?
In

... fierce intercolony struggles that limit the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

its refers to this species (the Argentine ant).
_________________
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2018
Posts: 117
Location: India
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2019, 00:52
In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has allowed the species to spread widely; due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

(A) due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits

When we are using due to means cause and effect should be there. So here there is not cause and effect, so using of due to is wrong. (WRONG).

(B) due to its being so genetically similar the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit

same as A. And use of IT is wrong. We can't use IT for ants.

(C) because it is so genetically similar, the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits

Same use of It is wrong. Limits (SVC): Correct is : struggles that limit not limits

(D) because they are so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit

Correct one.

(E) because of being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits

Same as C. Limits.
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 954
In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 16 Jan 2020, 02:10
possessive+doing is normally wrong on gmat.
their being similar to one another.

possessive+doing is correct only when doing is noun purely. if doing is gerund, which can take direct object, or participle which show an action of an agent in the sentence, it can not be preceded by possessive.

their learning of english in us is better. this is correct.

"being similar to one another " is not a noun, so, is wrong. we do not care weather the phrase is gerund or participle.

regarding choice C and D.
"that limits" is an error which is easy to explain but hard to do when the sentence is long. we can find this error only when we see two choices after eliminating 3 choices.
"it " / "they" in choice C and D is harder but this error can be seen more easily if we are familiar with it before.

Originally posted by thangvietnam on 29 Jul 2019, 02:16.
Last edited by thangvietnam on 16 Jan 2020, 02:10, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2018
Posts: 117
Location: India
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2019, 05:34
In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has allowed the species to spread widely; due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits the spread of this species in its native Argentina.

(A) due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits

(B) due to its being so genetically similar the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit

(C) because it is so genetically similar, the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits

(D) because they are so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit

(E) because of being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits

I just took this question in a simple way.

IF we will go through the question : In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has allowed the species to spread widely

This is kind of negative sentence, In California something is happening because " then the explanation why it is happening.

Due to we use when there is a dependency

Due to this..... that happened.
or
Because of this.... that happened.

So A,B,E : OUT

OUT OF C AND D

IN C : struggles that limits ( here is the error)

So D is the correct answer
Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2018
Posts: 135
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2019, 23:11
Here is my reason for quick elimination

(A) due to their being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits -use of due to is incorrect here
(B) due to its being so genetically similar the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit -error due to its , no verb between similar and the ant

(C) because it is so genetically similar, the ant considers all its fellows to be a close relative and thus does not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits , use of ambigous it , so should be followed by that

(D) because they are so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be close relatives and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limit -correct

(E) because of being so genetically similar to one another, the ants consider all their fellows to be a close relative and thus do not engage in the kind of fierce intercolony struggles that limits - struggles is plural so use of limits is incorerct
Re: In California, a lack of genetic variation in the Argentine ant has   [#permalink] 08 Dec 2019, 23:11

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 42 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by