GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Jul 2018, 00:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whip

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1829
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whip [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 May 2017, 07:34
2
1
hazelnut wrote:
In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Presently; no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.

(B) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.

(C) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

(D) The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding.

(E) The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.

GMATNinja This question was tricky. Could you help to identify the conclusion and the claim presented in the argument?

The conclusion of the passage, though a bit hidden, is contained in the sentence beginning with "Nevertheless...":

"{The facts presented in the first and second sentences} do not warrant the {inference} drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious."

The author claims that "in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered." This claim is presented as an argument against the inference drawn by some commentators.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 665
Re: In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whip [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2017, 01:55
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1206
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whip [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2017, 07:13
Imo D
In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Presently; no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.

(B) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.

(C) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

(D) The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding.

(E) The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.

Option D gives the relation between the two statements .
Statement is proved to faulty based on a faulty reasoning , second provides fact to prove statement 1 is wrong

_________________

Manager
Joined: 18 Feb 2017
Posts: 88
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20, IIMA , IIMC
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V30
GPA: 3.35
Re: In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whip [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2017, 03:46
MY FIRST CHOICE WAS E.THEN I AGAIN READ OPTION D.IN D,THERE IS WRITTEN "IN ORDER TO ARGUE AGAINST DERIVING CERTAIN IMPLICATIONS FROM THAT FINDING"
THAT TEMPTED ME TO GO FOR IT.BUT I WANT TO KNOW WHATS THE PROBLEM WITH OPTION E
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 497
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whip [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2017, 16:13
B,C eliminated as they are telling about support.
E is out because accuracy is not evaluated of first boldface.
remains A and D
A is out because 2nd boldface is not based on 1st bold face.
_________________

Give Kudos for correct answer and/or if you like the solution.

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1829
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whip [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2017, 00:48
JAIN09 wrote:
MY FIRST CHOICE WAS E.THEN I AGAIN READ OPTION D.IN D,THERE IS WRITTEN "IN ORDER TO ARGUE AGAINST DERIVING CERTAIN IMPLICATIONS FROM THAT FINDING"
THAT TEMPTED ME TO GO FOR IT.BUT I WANT TO KNOW WHATS THE PROBLEM WITH OPTION E

Quote:
(E) The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.

The first BF portion does describe a finding; however, the accuracy of that finding is not evaluated in the argument. The second BF portion is a claim, not evidence. In any case, the 2nd BF portion certainly does not tell us whether the finding in the 1st BF portion is accurate.

The author's argument is based on the finding in the 1st BF portion but does not question or dispute the accuracy or truth of that finding (just as premises are not questioned in other passages). Therefore, choice (E) can be eliminated.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2014
Posts: 60
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 580 Q41 V28
GPA: 3.8
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whip [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2017, 23:34
perfectstranger wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2017

Practice Question
Question No.: CR638
Page: 537

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Presently; no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious. Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.

(B) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.

(C) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

(D) The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding.

(E) The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.

Similar Question (Different Boldface) : LINK

Observation/ Finding - In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.

Fact - Presently; no objective test for whiplash exists,

Consideration - so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified.

Disagreement over Fact & Consideratio
n - Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious.

Claim/Main Conclusion - Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
(A) The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.
(B) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.
(C) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion for which the argument provides further evidence; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
(D) The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding.
(E) The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate.
Intern
Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 42
Re: In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whip [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Mar 2018, 18:14
Is there a cheat sheet for all these BF terms such as finding, claim, etc.
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 327
Re: In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whip [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 May 2018, 22:52
Bold 1 is a counterpoint.
Bold 2 is a premise.

(D) The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is a claim presented in order to argue against deriving certain implications from that finding.

Hence option D is correct.
_________________

"Please hit +1 Kudos if you like this post"

_________________
Manish

"Only I can change my life. No one can do it for me"

Re: In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whip   [#permalink] 29 May 2018, 22:52

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 50 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.