Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 May 2017, 17:59

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1713
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 374 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2005, 14:12
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (02:15) correct 25% (02:00) wrong based on 15 sessions

7. In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected. (A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected (B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers (C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers (D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected (E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers _________________ hey ya...... If you have any questions you can ask an expert New! Manager Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 87 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0 ### Show Tags 01 Nov 2005, 15:08 I go with D. "civil damages for cars" is wrong. it's not for the cars but for test-driving those cars. And E is wrong since it's not for having cars (which were test-driven without their odometers connected) that it was fined but for test-driving these cars. Senior Manager Joined: 07 Jul 2005 Posts: 402 Followers: 3 Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0 ### Show Tags 01 Nov 2005, 21:32 a) Out: "$16 million for car" does not make sense
b) Out: "it" has no clear referant
c) Out: "its" has no clear referant
d) Out: awkward.

SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1711
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Re: SC # odometer tampering [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2005, 22:31
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5221
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 403 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2005, 09:03
D over E because it is much less wordy. Pay \$ in damages for (v~ing) is idiomatic.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10363
Followers: 999

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2015, 00:27
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no   [#permalink] 02 Aug 2015, 00:27
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Two British hackers pleaded 4 23 Apr 2017, 01:47
15 In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no 6 19 Nov 2015, 21:18
4 In December of 1987 an automobile manufacture pleaded no 23 11 Mar 2016, 08:51
3 Domestic automobile manufacturers have invested millions of 7 10 Apr 2016, 02:59
One automobile manufacturer has announced plans to increase 5 19 Jan 2012, 20:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.