It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 10:43

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 117

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2006, 09:41
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.

(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

Please explain

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1116

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2006, 21:00
E is wrong since it's not for having cars that were driven with their odometer disconnected but that it was fined for test-driving these cars( with odometer disconnected).
Only D makes this logical point clear.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2006, 21:22
buzzgaurav wrote:
E is wrong since it's not for having cars that were driven with their odometer disconnected but that it was fined for test-driving these cars( with odometer disconnected).
Only D makes this logical point clear.


Good one! :cool One more for D.

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 24 Apr 2006, 21:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.