It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 23:42

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

4 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 20 [4], given: 0

Location: Boston
In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2006, 20:49
4
This post received
KUDOS
14
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:12) correct 32% (01:29) wrong based on 561 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania's annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) All health care in Gandania is government-funded.

(B) Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause a significant increase in the amount of tobacco Gandania exports.

(C) The percentage of revenue Gandania receives from tobacco sales has remained steady in recent years.

(D) Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government.

(E) No government official in Gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

1st 600, 2nd 680, 3rd 760 ? =)

Kudos [?]: 20 [4], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 120

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida, Argentina, UK
Re: In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Oct 2006, 16:01
By spending less on health care, the gov. will cut an important source of debt in the LR. Therefore, A would weaken the argument.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 195

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 3

Schools: Stanford...Wait, I will come!!!
Re: In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2008, 04:57
winskc wrote:
In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania’s annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. All health care in Gandania is government-funded.
B. Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause a significant increase in the amount of tobacco Gandania exports.
C. The percentage of revenue Gandania receives from tobacco sales has remained steady in recent years.
D. Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government.
E. No government official in Gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use.


Only A & B are in contention. But it does not specify if what percentage of the tobacco..does the govt exports.. if it exports all, then, it also weakens.
But again..A is far more stronger choice for B to let in. :) I will go for A, what is OA.. ?

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 3

2 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 443 [2], given: 1

Re: In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2008, 16:33
2
This post received
KUDOS
can't be D.

Conclusion is G cannot afford to institute the proposed laws that curtail the use of tobacco.

We need some thing that says G can afford to or have to afford.

Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government, but still those profits make up only 10% of the revenues and the remaining 90% is untouched. Also it does not say how much will profits go down by to make such decision.

But with A, all HC funded by govt, govt can eliminate health costs and improve public health at the expense of profits from tobacco.

hence A

Kudos [?]: 443 [2], given: 1

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 116

Kudos [?]: 118 [2], given: 0

Re: In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2008, 12:58
2
This post received
KUDOS
Where do these questions with the strange OA's come from? icandy is correct: B (if it is relevant at all) would strengthen the argument, not weaken it. The correct answer is A.

As for D, the fact that profits from tobacco are the single greatest source of revenue tells us nothing at all about how much those profits would decline because of the laws, nor about how much could or could not be replaced by other revenue sources.

If anything, D might weaken the argument by showing that the WORST possible outcome would be to lose a maximum of 10% of revenues.
_________________

Grumpy

Kaplan Canada LSAT/GMAT/GRE teacher and tutor

Kudos [?]: 118 [2], given: 0

Expert Post
4 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7738

Kudos [?]: 17827 [4], given: 235

Location: Pune, India
Re: in gandania, where the government has a monoply on tobacco s [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2013, 21:02
4
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
nelz007 wrote:
in Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws and aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania's annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.

Which of the following,if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A) All health care in gandania is government-funded.
B) Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause significant increase in the amount of tobacco gandania exports.
C) The percentage of revenue gandania recieves from tobaco sales has remained steady in recent years.
D) profits from tobaco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the gandandian government.
E) No government official in gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use.

Could someone please explain the various answer choices. Thanks!


Responding to a pm:

Question Type: Weaken

We should try to weaken the conclusion.

Conclusion: Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.
Notice the author believes that Gandania cannot AFFORD to institute these laws i.e. the country will suffer financially if these laws are brought in (since tobacco accounts for 10% of the revenue). To weaken the conclusion, we need to bring in some reason because of which the country may not suffer financially even if these laws are brought into effect.
Also notice that the laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use IN Gandania, not in other countries. In the prethinking phase, all I could think of was perhaps the laws encourage export or something - very unethical but we don't need to comment on morals, just the financial aspect (anyway, it wasn't there in the options so no dilemma)

A) All health care in gandania is government-funded.
This option weakens our conclusion. If all health care in govt funded, the cost of health care would be increasing for the govt with tobacco use. If this law is brought into effect, the decrease in smoking could reduce the money spent in health care and hence the govt's finances could essentially stay the same even after the law is brought into effect. Hence, this weakens our conclusion that the govt cannot afford to institute the law. Answer (A)

B) Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause significant increase in the amount of tobacco gandania exports.
This option tells us that exports will not increase hence the govt will suffer financially. It strengthens the given conclusion instead of weakening it.

C) The percentage of revenue gandania recieves from tobaco sales has remained steady in recent years.
Out of scope

D) profits from tobaco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the gandandian government.
Strengthens the conclusion instead of weakening it.

E) No government official in gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use.
Out of scope
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17827 [4], given: 235

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Final Lap
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 281

Kudos [?]: 415 [0], given: 85

Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.54
WE: Project Management (Retail Banking)
Re: in gandania, where the government has a monoply on tobacco s [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2013, 02:52
nelz007 wrote:
in Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws and aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania's annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.

Which of the following,if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A) All health care in gandania is government-funded. CORRECT because if u look more closely to this option, you can deducte from it that if the proposed laws were to be instituted, it will reduce smoking ---> health care GOOD ----> the goverment will compensate the profits from tobacco sales by the economy released through health care
B) Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause significant increase in the amount of tobacco gandania exports. Incorrect, we are not concerned with gandania exports
C) The percentage of revenue gandania recieves from tobaco sales has remained steady in recent years. Incorrect, no value added about whether gandania can or can not afford to institute the proposed laws
D) profits from tobaco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the gandandian government. Incorrect because if this is true, Gandania for sure, cannot afford to institute the proposed laws, hence this option strenghtens the conclusion
E) No government official in gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use. Incorrect, so if this is true, how do we can figure out whether the proposed laws gonna work or not .

Could someone please explain the various answer choices. Thanks!


Hence, only A weakens properly the argument
_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

"If you don't change your life, your life will change you"

Kudos [?]: 415 [0], given: 85

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2013
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

Re: In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jun 2013, 23:52
Still don't understand why A is right?

Arguement: Profits from Tobacco = 10% of Gandania'a Revenue. So they should not implement this law.

A. All health care in Gandania is government-funded. <-- How does this come into picture? Isn't this Out of scope?

We can arrive at this by eliminating all other options but how is this justified?

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

13 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1126

Kudos [?]: 3553 [13], given: 123

Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2013, 23:24
13
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
KalEl wrote:
Still don't understand why A is right?


Hi KalEl. I'm glad to help.

This question is tough. OA is A.


ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: In Gandania, the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales,
Fact: However, Profits from tobacco sales account for 10% of Gandania's annual revenues.
Conclusion: Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.

The KEY of this question is the formula: GOV NET INCOME = GOV REVENUE - GOV EXPENSES.

The author says sales from tobacco account 10% of Government Revenue ==> He concludes that if the proposed laws are instituted ==> Gov Revenues decrease ==> Net Income will decrease ==> Government CAN NOT afford to institute these laws.

The assumption is: Government expenses will not decrease or stay the same after the proposed laws are instituted.

What if: The new laws make Government Revenue decrease, say 10%, but they also make Government Expenses decrease, say greater than 10% ==> Government Net Income will increase. That's the KEY.


ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

A) All health care in gandania is government-funded.
Correct. Even the new laws make government revenues decrease, but what if they also make government expenses DECREASE too (because the government CAN DECREASE its expenses for health care regarding tobacco issues.) ==> Government Net income may not decrease or even increase.

B) Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause significant increase in the amount of tobacco gandania exports.
Wrong. Total sales = Domestic sales + Exports ==> New laws make both domestic sales and export decrease ==> Government total revenue will decrease for sure.

C) The percentage of revenue gandania recieves from tobaco sales has remained steady in recent years.
Wrong. Does not affect at all. "remain steady in recent years" does not mean "remain forever".

D) profits from tobaco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the gandandian government.
Wrong. If profits from tobacco sales are much greater than any other source ==> their decline will make a big shortfall of government revenue in the future.

E) No government official in gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use.
Wrong. Out of scope for sure.


TAKEAWAY:
In real GMAT, when you see questions regarding Profit, Expenses, Revenue, Costs.....
* If the questions have ONLY profit/revenues ==> Make conclusion ==> Think about the opposite side: Costs/Expenses
* If the questions have ONLY Costs/Expenses ==> Make conclusion ==> Think about the opposite side: Revenue/Profit.

Hope it helps
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3553 [13], given: 123

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2013
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

Re: In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jun 2013, 04:05
@pqhai:

Ah, I get it now. Didn't think enough to link health care and tobacco.

+1 Kudos!!! :)

Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 May 2014
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 14

Re: In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2014, 05:49
For me also A - more smoker == more patients == more gov spending

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 14

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10128

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2017, 05:59
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the   [#permalink] 16 Aug 2017, 05:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.