Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 05:59 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 05:59

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 707
Own Kudos [?]: 448 [87]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 232 [55]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92912
Own Kudos [?]: 618930 [5]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 57 [5]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
3
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of which must compete to enter the brain. Subsequent ingestion of sugars leads to the production of insulin, a hormone that breaks down the sugars and also rids the bloodstream of residual amino acids, except for tryptophan. Tryptophan then slips into the brain uncontested and is transformed into the chemical serotonin, increasing the brain’s serotonin level. Thus sugars cause mood elevation, helping one to feel relaxed and anxiety-free.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Elevation of mood and freedom from anxiety require increasing the level of serotonin the brain.
(B) Failure to consume foods rich in sugars results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.
(C) Serotonin can be produced naturally only if tryptophan is presented in the bloodstream.
(D) Increasing the level of serotonin in the brain promotes relaxation and freedom from anxiety.
(E) The consumption of protein-rich foods results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.

For this Q can all A,B & D be correct answers?
CR bible says when we have causal reasoning as in this modified Q, effect(mood elevation) occurs only when cause(sugar) occurs.
And in such Qs assumption question is similar to strengthen question for which correct answer fits "cause doesn't occur, effect doesn't occur" category.
I am changing B(which originally is like "no cause, OPPOSITE effect" to
B) Mood elevation is not observed in people who consume foods not rich sugar.
Now it is "no cause, no effect". Does that mean this is also a correct answer?

Also according to CR bible, since this causal reasoning Q, sugar is the only reason for mood elevation.
That means even A should answer the Q.
What do you think?

Below is original Q with straightforwad answer

Quote:
In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of which must compete to enter the brain. Subsequent ingestion of sugars leads to the production of insulin, a hormone that breaks down the sugars and also rids the bloodstream of residual amino acids, except for tryptophan. Tryptophan then slips into the brain uncontested and is transformed into the chemical serotonin, increasing the brain’s serotonin level. Thus, sugars can play a major role in mood elevation, helping one to feel relaxed and anxiety-free.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Elevation of mood and freedom from anxiety require increasing the level of serotonin in the brain.
(B) Failure to consume foods rich in sugars results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.
(C) Serotonin can be produced naturally only if tryptophan is present in the bloodstream.
(D) Increasing the level of serotonin in the brain promotes relaxation and freedom from anxiety.
(E) The consumption of protein-rich foods results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.

Attachments

File comment: CR bible Assumptions and Causality topic
Assumptions and Causality.docx [13.47 KiB]
Downloaded 990 times


Originally posted by hellishbrain on 05 Mar 2011, 17:45.
Last edited by hellishbrain on 06 Mar 2011, 09:09, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Posts: 472
Own Kudos [?]: 892 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
1
Kudos
hellishbrain wrote:
Thanks guys but you seem to answer the original Q, which I have given only for reference.
Please answer my questions and not the original Q(I know it's open answer)
Modified Q(by me) has "sugars cause mood elevation.." instead of "sugars can play a major role in mood ele.."...
This makes it cause-effect problem...Below is what CR bible says about such arguments
“When an GMAT speaker concludes that one occurrence caused another,that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause of the effect and that consequently the stated cause will always produce the effect.”

Lets assume CR bible is not "gospel" truth. Everything is not spoken by God ;-) We are even and I can critique the above now.
“When an GMAT speaker concludes that one occurrence caused another,
that speaker also assumes that the stated cause is the only possible cause
of the effect and that consequently the stated cause will always produce
the effect.”
Yes this is true in a cause and effect scenario when it is asserting. ONLY X leads to Y. Now the conclusion starts with exclusivity. i.e. only. Assumption is like a "bridge" - on which conclusion "stands". If conclusion is heavy, the bridge should be "iron clad".


From this don't you think A can also be the answer. Above statement assumes the "exclusivity".
Also what about B(modified)? I have reasoned how even that can be possible answer.
To make B as an answer, you must rephrase conclusion to start with "only"

Note: Since my query is related to modified Q you don't need to select just one answer. Please let me know all possible CORRECT answers.
Hope that helps !
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Posts: 472
Own Kudos [?]: 892 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I missed "modified B". Lets take a look

B) Mood elevation is not observed in people who consume foods not rich sugar.------> This can countered with statement - mood elevation is observed in people who consume "normal" levels of sugar.

So the quantity of sugar is irrelevant to the conclusion. Conclusion rests on whether "serotonin" levels help the person "become" anxiety free and relaxed.

On the other hand, A assumes exclusivity - "requires".
(A) Elevation of mood and freedom from anxiety require increasing the level of serotonin the brain.------>
This assumption can be countered easily - If the person has genetic propensity for serotonin levels in the blood, he doesn't require an extra dose. So "require" is plain wrong.

D is the only one left.
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9243 [2]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
hellishbrain wrote:
Also according to CR bible, since this causal reasoning Q, sugar is the only reason for mood elevation.


I'm 100% certain the CR 'bible' does not say that. If, for example, I make the very simple argument: 'cars cause pollution', I'm certainly not saying that cars are the *only* cause of pollution. Nor am I assuming what is known in logic as the 'converse' (negate the cause, negate the effect) - that if there were no cars, there would be no pollution. In general, if an argument is sound, the converse will not necessarily be sound; sometimes it is, and sometimes it's not. The converse is never, however, a necessary *assumption* in any argument, and remember that's what the question in your post asked for: an assumption. So your hypothetical answer B is in no way an assumption in the argument, and would not be the correct answer here.

Instead we have an argument in the form 'X causes Y, therefore X causes Z'. In the language of the question, the argument says 'sugar causes increased serotonin, therefore sugar causes happiness'. For that argument to be sound, we need to assume that Y causes Z -- that is, that serotonin causes happiness. That's why the answer is D.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 57 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
@IanStewart
I agree with every point(personally that is what i thought but asking these questions because CR bible seems to suggest something different) of yours except may be the first sentence.
If you are 100% certain, am I reading CR bible incorrectly? I must be missing something.

All the queries I raised are based on CR bible strategy for assumption Qs.
Please go through attached doc(exactly copied from CR bible) and make me understand.
Please see an example in the doc for the 'converse'.
Isn't 'converse' really 'effect as cause and cause as effect' and not 'negate cause, negate effect'?
Irrespective of that, CR bible says showing 'reverse doesn't exist' (category D in doc) or 'no cause, no effect'(category C) can be the assumption.

Thanks.

IanStewart wrote:
hellishbrain wrote:
Also according to CR bible, since this causal reasoning Q, sugar is the only reason for mood elevation.


I'm 100% certain the CR 'bible' does not say that. If, for example, I make the very simple argument: 'cars cause pollution', I'm certainly not saying that cars are the *only* cause of pollution. Nor am I assuming what is known in logic as the 'converse' (negate the cause, negate the effect) - that if there were no cars, there would be no pollution. In general, if an argument is sound, the converse will not necessarily be sound; sometimes it is, and sometimes it's not. The converse is never, however, a necessary *assumption* in any argument, and remember that's what the question in your post asked for: an assumption. So your hypothetical answer B is in no way an assumption in the argument, and would not be the correct answer here.

Instead we have an argument in the form 'X causes Y, therefore X causes Z'. In the language of the question, the argument says 'sugar causes increased serotonin, therefore sugar causes happiness'. For that argument to be sound, we need to assume that Y causes Z -- that is, that serotonin causes happiness. That's why the answer is D.
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9243 [1]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Perhaps I should have said '99% sure' instead of '100%'. I won't comment on the contents of a book without seeing quotes in context, and I don't have a copy of that book handy at the moment. I stand by what I said above, however; when someone claims that a certain cause produces a certain effect, there can still be other causes which produce that effect. That's true in real life, and on the GMAT as well. If the 'bible' says otherwise, it's plainly wrong.

As for the meaning of the 'converse' in logic, there are two equivalent ways of defining it. If we say 'When A is true, B is true', then what is known in logic as the 'converse' says 'when B is true, A is true'. You can restate that in an entirely equivalent way by saying 'when A is not true, B is not true' (if you know the language of formal logic, I'm just taking the 'contrapositive', though you don't need to know that term).

Now, when an argument is true, the converse need not be true; sometimes it is, and sometimes it is not. It's perhaps easiest to take an example from mathematics. For example, 'if x = 2, then x^2 = 4' is clearly true. The converse is not, however: 'if x^2 = 4' then it is not necessarily true that x=2, since x might be equal to -2.

In any case, when you make an argument, you are never *assuming* the converse of your argument is true; it's not an assumption, nor is it equivalent to the original argument.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Affiliations: SAE
Posts: 380
Own Kudos [?]: 961 [1]
Given Kudos: 269
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE:Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
+1 D

Premise - In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of which must compete to enter the brain. Subsequent ingestion of sugars leads to the production of insulin, a hormone that breaks down the sugars and also rids the bloodstream of residual amino acids, except for tryptophan. Tryptophan then slips into the brain uncontested and is transformed into the chemical serotonin, increasing the brain’s serotonin level.

Conclusion - Thus sugars cause mood elevation, helping one to feel relaxed and anxiety-free.

Clearly there is a gap between the premise and the conclusion. Any option which connects these two i.e. Serotonin with relaxation and freedom from anxiety is our answer

After the preliminary check, only options A and D are left.

(A) Elevation of mood and freedom from anxiety require increasing the level of serotonin the brain (This option is poorly constructed and does not include relaxation)
(D) Increasing the level of serotonin in the brain promotes relaxation and freedom from anxiety (This is our answer as it correctly fills the hole between the premise and the assumption)

:-D
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2012
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.25
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
mun23 wrote:
In humans,ingested protein is broken down into amino acids,all of which must compete to enter the brain.Subsequent ingestion of sugars leads to the production of insulin,a horemone that breaks down the sugars and also rids the bloodstream of residual amino acids,except for tryptophan.Tryptohan then slips into the brain uncontested and is transformed into the chemical scrotonin ,increasing the brain`s scrotonin level.Thus,sugars can play a major role in mood elevation,helping one to feel relaxed and anxiety-free.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A)Elevation of mood and freedom from anxiety require increasing the level of scrotonin in the brain Strengthens the argument
(B)Failure to consume foods rich in sugars results in anxiety and a lowering of mood Consume =! ingestion
(C)Scrotonin can be produced naturally only if tryptophan is present in the bloodstream How scrotonin is produced is not relevant in this argument --> out of scope
(D)Increasing the level of scrotonin in the brain promotes relaxation and freedom from anxiety Here is the link we are looking for
(E)The consumption of protein-rich foods results in anxiety and a lowering of mood. Protein rich food is not part of the argument --> out of scope

Need explanation.............


You have to find the missing link between the premises (blah blah increasing the brain`s scrotonin level) & the conclusion (sugars can play a major role in mood elevation). The relation between scrotonin level & mood elevation.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14822
Own Kudos [?]: 64909 [2]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
MA wrote:
In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of which must compete to enter the brain. Subsequent ingestion of sugars leads to the production of insulin, a hormone that breaks down the sugars and also rids the bloodstream of residual amino acids, except for tryptophan, Tryptophan then slips into the brain uncontested and is transformed into the chemical serotonin, increasing the brain's serotonin level. Thus sugars can play a major role in mood elevation, helping one to feel relaxed and anxiety-free.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Elevation of mood and freedom from anxiety require increasing the level of serotonin the brain.
(B) Failure to consume foods rich in sugars results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.
(C) Serotonin can be produced naturally only if tryptophan is presented in the bloodstream.
(D) Increasing the level of serotonin in the brain promotes relaxation and freedom from anxiety.
(E) The consumption of protein-rich foods results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.

Source : LSAT PrepTest38 Q#22



Protein breaks down into many amino acids which compete to enter brain
Subsequently sugars produce insulin which cleans up residual amino acids except tryptophan
Tryptophan enters brain without competition and produces serotonin in brain

Conclusion: sugars can play a major role in mood elevation, helping one to feel relaxed and anxiety-free.

Note that the argument does not talk about feeling relaxed and anxiety free but the conclusion concludes it. So the assumption should be the missing link between the premises and the conclusion. Something that tells us that serotonin leads to feeling relaxed and anxiety-free. That is how we can establish the chain of sugar -> insulin -> tryptophan absorption -> serotonin -> feeling relaxed and anxiety free


(A) Elevation of mood and freedom from anxiety require increasing the level of serotonin the brain.
Not assumed. "require" means necessary. We do not need to assume that serotonin is necessary for freedom from anxiety etc. All we need is to establish that serotonin leads to freedom from anxiety. There could be other ways leading to freedom from anxiety too. Serotonin may not be "REQUIRED" for freedom from anxiety etc.

(B) Failure to consume foods rich in sugars results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.
Again, not necessary. Consuming sugars after proteins could result in lower anxiety. That does not mean that not consuming sugars will lead to anxiety and lowering of mood.

(C) Serotonin can be produced naturally only if tryptophan is presented in the bloodstream.
The argument says that tryptophan produces serotonin but it does not assume that that is the only way of producing serotonin naturally.

(D) Increasing the level of serotonin in the brain promotes relaxation and freedom from anxiety.
Correct. This gives us the missing link between serotonin and relaxation & freedom from anxiety. Increased level of serotonin promotes relaxation & freedom from anxiety. That is how sugars can lead to relaxation & freedom from anxiety. This is the missing necessary premise that the argument assumes for its conclusion.

(E) The consumption of protein-rich foods results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.
No such assumption.

Answer (D)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2018
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
GOAL/CONCLUSION: SUGER (SEROTIN LEVEL INCREASE) ====RESULTS IN====> MOOD ELEVATION
CONDITIONAL QUESTION

S (SUFFICIENT CONDITION)--------->N (NECESSARY CONDITION)

If S occur N occur
If N occur S may or may not occur

A. If N occur , S should occur ---WRONG
B. ”RICH IN SUGER” --We are not concerned about quantity of suger so ELIMINATED
C. “NATURALLY” – OUT OF CONTEXT
D. S occur -->N occur CORRECT ANSWER
E. (OUT OF CONTEXT)—PROTEIN RICH FOODS
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2020
Posts: 40
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 607
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
KarishmaB wrote:
MA wrote:
In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of which must compete to enter the brain. Subsequent ingestion of sugars leads to the production of insulin, a hormone that breaks down the sugars and also rids the bloodstream of residual amino acids, except for tryptophan, Tryptophan then slips into the brain uncontested and is transformed into the chemical serotonin, increasing the brain's serotonin level. Thus sugars can play a major role in mood elevation, helping one to feel relaxed and anxiety-free.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Elevation of mood and freedom from anxiety require increasing the level of serotonin the brain.
(B) Failure to consume foods rich in sugars results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.
(C) Serotonin can be produced naturally only if tryptophan is presented in the bloodstream.
(D) Increasing the level of serotonin in the brain promotes relaxation and freedom from anxiety.
(E) The consumption of protein-rich foods results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.

Source : LSAT PrepTest38 Q#22


Hi Karishma,

Kindly help me with the following question.

Does "necessary" mean "only" ?



Protein breaks down into many amino acids which compete to enter brain
Subsequently sugars produce insulin which cleans up residual amino acids except tryptophan
Tryptophan enters brain without competition and produces serotonin in brain

Conclusion: sugars can play a major role in mood elevation, helping one to feel relaxed and anxiety-free.

Note that the argument does not talk about feeling relaxed and anxiety free but the conclusion concludes it. So the assumption should be the missing link between the premises and the conclusion. Something that tells us that serotonin leads to feeling relaxed and anxiety-free. That is how we can establish the chain of sugar -> insulin -> tryptophan absorption -> serotonin -> feeling relaxed and anxiety free


(A) Elevation of mood and freedom from anxiety require increasing the level of serotonin the brain.
Not assumed. "require" means necessary. We do not need to assume that serotonin is necessary for freedom from anxiety etc. All we need is to establish that serotonin leads to freedom from anxiety. There could be other ways leading to freedom from anxiety too. Serotonin may not be "REQUIRED" for freedom from anxiety etc.

(B) Failure to consume foods rich in sugars results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.
Again, not necessary. Consuming sugars after proteins could result in lower anxiety. That does not mean that not consuming sugars will lead to anxiety and lowering of mood.

(C) Serotonin can be produced naturally only if tryptophan is presented in the bloodstream.
The argument says that tryptophan produces serotonin but it does not assume that that is the only way of producing serotonin naturally.

(D) Increasing the level of serotonin in the brain promotes relaxation and freedom from anxiety.
Correct. This gives us the missing link between serotonin and relaxation & freedom from anxiety. Increased level of serotonin promotes relaxation & freedom from anxiety. That is how sugars can lead to relaxation & freedom from anxiety. This is the missing necessary premise that the argument assumes for its conclusion.

(E) The consumption of protein-rich foods results in anxiety and a lowering of mood.
No such assumption.

Answer (D)


Hi Karishma,

Does "necessary" mean "only?"
WHat do we mean by necessary in the context of this question and why is the use of "necessary" wrong?
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17221
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, all of wh [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne