It is currently 24 Nov 2017, 06:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 130

Kudos [?]: 968 [0], given: 0

Location: Corea
In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2004, 16:50
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

80% (00:30) correct 20% (00:04) wrong based on 15 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie theaters started propping its popcorn in canola oil, instead of the less healthful coconut oil that it had been using until then. Now Moviemania is planning to switch back, saying that the change has hurt popcorn sales. That claim is false, however, since according to Moviemania’s own sales figures, Moviemania sold 5 percent more popcorn last year than in the previous year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Moviemania’s claim?

A. Total sales of all refreshments at Moviemania’s movie theaters increased by less than 5 percent last year.
B. Moviemania makes more money on food and beverages sold at its theaters than it does on sales of movie tickets.
C. Moviemania’s customers prefer the taste of popcorn popped in coconut oil to that of popcorn popped in canola oil.
D. Total attendance at Moviemania’s movie theaters was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before.
E. The year before last, Moviemania experienced a 10 percent increase in popcorn sales over the previous year.

Kudos [?]: 968 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 134

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2004, 19:32
In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie theaters started propping its popcorn in canola oil, instead of the less healthful coconut oil that it had been using until then. Now Moviemania is planning to switch back, saying that the change has hurt popcorn sales. That claim is false, however, since according to Moviemania’s own sales figures, Moviemania sold 5 percent more popcorn last year than in the previous year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Moviemania’s claim?

Total sales of all refreshments at Moviemania’s movie theaters increased by less than 5 percent last year. Possible Answer. If Moviemania chain sold 5% increase in popcorn sales whiles all other refreshments sold below 5% percent, it sales in general were bad and therefore it is not the changing over from one oil to the other that hurt sales. Sales were generally bad.
B. Moviemania makes more money on food and beverages sold at its theaters than it does on sales of movie tickets.
C. Moviemania’s customers prefer the taste of popcorn popped in coconut oil to that of popcorn popped in canola oil.
D. Total attendance at Moviemania’s movie theaters was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before.
E. The year before last, Moviemania experienced a 10 percent increase in popcorn sales over the previous year.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 891

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2004, 20:52
Good one guys.

The thread has some good discussion on this topic
http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... moviemania

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2004, 10:37
I just had a different reasoning.

If total sales of all refreshments increased by <5% and popocorn sales increased by more than 5% then it says that popularity of pop corn cooked in new oil has hurt the sale of other refreshments hence company's claim is correct

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 606

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2004, 12:48
Anand,

Trus if you suppose that there is correlation between sales of new popcorn and sales of other types of food and beverage.
Theoreticaly you re right and we need before concluding A is the right answer to know if +5% pop corn increase in sales was not achieved to the detriment of other sales.

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 26 Sep 2004, 12:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.