Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 May 2017, 10:59

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In many corporations, employees are being replaced by

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 259
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 9

In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2011, 04:30
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

74% (01:59) correct 26% (01:12) wrong based on 663 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument?

A. Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.
B. Many corporations that have failed to automate have seen their profits decline.
C. Taxes and unemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating.
D. Most of the new jobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did.
E. The initial investment in machinery for automation is often greater than the short-term savings in labor costs.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by JarvisR on 19 Jul 2015, 00:59, edited 1 time in total.
OA updated
If you have any questions
New!
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2013
Followers: 163

Kudos [?]: 1828 [7] , given: 376

Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2011, 07:18
7
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
DeeptiM wrote:
In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.

Author's Argument: Automation may not result in reduced expenses in the corporations; on the contrary, laying-off workers may adversely affect them because they will have to pay more in taxes and for unemployment insurance claims.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument?

A. Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.
As author warned, the corporations are indeed bearing the monetary responsibilities for cutting jobs as the people they laid-off are jobless for extended period. Correct.

B. Many corporations that have failed to automate have seen their profits decline.
Weakens. Opposing author's calculated skepticism with automation, corporations that employed it actually saved their own skin.

C. Taxes and unemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating.
Corporations Counter-argument: So what Mr. Author, what are we to lose. Automation or no automation, we're anyway to bear the burden of both the things you just mentioned. We'll go ahead with our plan anyway; thanks for the heads-up though.

D. Most of the new jobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did.
Automation were employed for some reasons and this is one among those. Automation did bring down the expenses that the corporations had been paying off as salaries. Weakens.

E. The initial investment in machinery for automation is often greater than the short-term savings in labor costs.
Corporations may be seeking long-term benefits. This is out of scope.

Ans: "A"
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 256
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 183 [0], given: 20

Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2012, 18:17
fluke wrote:
A. Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.
As author warned, the corporations are indeed bearing the monetary responsibilities for cutting jobs as the people they laid-off are jobless for extended period. Correct.

Ans: "A"

good reasoning.
First statement says companies are SAVING money. Second statement contradicts with that by introducing the word 'However' with the fact that companies have to pay money for the unemployment they created. With this, A is the only one that fits the bill.
_________________

-------------------------
-Aravind Chembeti

Manager
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 139
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 24

Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2012, 10:02
Very stright A
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 146
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2012, 17:20
+1 A
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10311
Followers: 1000

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2013, 02:10
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10311
Followers: 1000

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2015, 12:06
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2016
Posts: 20
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 37

In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2016, 14:06
Chembeti wrote:
fluke wrote:
A. Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.
As author warned, the corporations are indeed bearing the monetary responsibilities for cutting jobs as the people they laid-off are jobless for extended period. Correct.

Ans: "A"

good reasoning.
First statement says companies are SAVING money. Second statement contradicts with that by introducing the word 'However' with the fact that companies have to pay money for the unemployment they created. With this, A is the only one that fits the bill.

I am not sure i follow the reasoning. Please elaborate a bit

To me option A seemed like this: If people laid off are unable to find new jobs, it is most likely because companies are not willing to hire people as they found a better and more profitable alternative in automation, and are more willing to do so.
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Posts: 111
GPA: 3.92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 109

Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2016, 15:35
A. However, D has somewhat similar logic, but is wrong because it does not say how much less the new jobs pay.
Intern
Joined: 02 Jul 2016
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 32

Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2017, 01:42
This question I feel should be in the form of Find the Assumption. Any thoughts?

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 17 May 2016
Posts: 30
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 36

Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2017, 05:19
Hi All,

Sorry in advance if my question seems stupid :

While reading, I had the impression that there were no conclusion, only a bunch of statements.
Since the only affirmative sentence was the first, I thought that the conclusion was the following : Replacement of workers ==> Savings
I thought that the second part However it is possible that actually it costs money was only an hypothesis, a possibility.

Then my question is the following : How can you consider a probabability, without any affirmation (introduced by however), a conclusion ?

Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2015
Posts: 90
GPA: 3.92
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 153

Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2017, 11:58
nickimonckom wrote:
Hi All,

Sorry in advance if my question seems stupid :

While reading, I had the impression that there were no conclusion, only a bunch of statements.
Since the only affirmative sentence was the first, I thought that the conclusion was the following : Replacement of workers ==> Savings
I thought that the second part However it is possible that actually it costs money was only an hypothesis, a possibility.

Then my question is the following : How can you consider a probabability, without any affirmation (introduced by however), a conclusion ?

Focus on whats highlighted:
However,many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.

Here the author is confirming that companies will eventually have to pay for unemployment. But what if the employees who lost their jobs to automation find jobs in another company? Then the company wont have to pay for unemployment.
But if the employees who lost their jobs to automation are unsuccessful in finding a job? Then these companies will have to pay for them through increased taxes and insurance.

Hope this makes sense.
_________________

If you analyze enough data, you can predict the future.....its calculating probability, nothing more!

Re: In many corporations, employees are being replaced by   [#permalink] 11 Feb 2017, 11:58
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Many of Vebrol Corporation's department heads Will retire this year. T 2 18 Jan 2017, 17:03
5 Revision Project: In many corporations, employees are being 11 24 Aug 2016, 12:02
10 At Balpy Corporation, an employee's retirement plan is 10 24 Mar 2017, 11:30
15 Many households have replaced at least one of their 17 26 Dec 2016, 04:26
5 In many corporations, employees are being replaced by 12 16 Dec 2015, 15:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by