It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 02:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In many surveys, American consumers have expressed a

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 364

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 22

Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
In many surveys, American consumers have expressed a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2010, 20:39
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

64% (00:48) correct 36% (01:11) wrong based on 66 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In many surveys, American consumers have expressed a willingness to spend up to 10 percent more for products that are ecologically sound. Encouraged by such surveys, Bleach-O corporation promoted a new laundry detergent, Bleach-O Green, as safer for the environment. Bleach-O Green costs 5 percent more than typical detergents. After one year, Bleach-O Green had failed to capture a significant share of the detergent market and was withdrawn from sale.

Which of the following questions is LEAST likely to be relevant in determining the reasons for the failure of Bleach-O Green?

A) How effective as a detergent was Bleach-O Green?
B) How many other detergents on the market were promoted as safe for the environment?
C) How much more did Bleach-O Green cost to manufacture than ordinary detergents?
D) To what extend did consumers accept the validity of Bleach-O Green advertised and promoted to consumers?
E) How effectively was Bleach-O Green advertised and promoted to consumers?

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA after discussion.

_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 22

Manager
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 203

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2010, 21:51
Bleach-O couldnt capture significant share even though its eco friendly and 5% more than typical detergents and consumers are willing to buy eco friendly products upto 10% more

A ) this could explain that bleach-O didnt do its part as a detergent
B) if there are lot other eco friendly detergents, then consumers might prefer those coz they might be cheaper and therby bleach-O might not have got to a significant portion of the market share
C) cost of bleach O can be more than other detergents but this doenst explain why bleach O didnt capture significant market share even though it is eco friendly and in the range of consumer buying price.
D & E - if consumers didnt believe that bleach-O is effective, then they wouldnt buy this as this would be costly than normal detergents and also might prefer to buy some other product which is eco friendly

C

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 417

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 16

Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2010, 00:00
I would go with B.
_________________

Never give up,,,

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 16

Intern
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 40

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 22

Schools: McCombs

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2010, 14:25
Bleach-O Green failed because it did not capture a significant share of the detergent market.

A) How effective as a detergent was Bleach-O Green?
If a product doesn't work then this could explain its failure to capture market share

B) How many other detergents on the market were promoted as safe for the environment?
Could explain failure due to heavy competition

C) How much more did Bleach-O Green cost to manufacture than ordinary detergents?
Failure in the passage is based on Bleach-O Green's inability to capture significant market share and high or low manufacturing cost will not directly effect market share

D) To what extend did consumers accept the validity of Bleach-O Green advertised and promoted to consumers? To what extent did consumers accept the validity of Bleach-O Green's advertisements and promotions?
I couldn't understand this question, I think it needs to be reworded. It failed because consumers did not believe in Bleach-O Green's advertisement claims

E) How effectively was Bleach-O Green advertised and promoted to consumers?
If consumers don't know a product even exists, then this could explain its failure
_________________

GMAT Retake - Summer/Fall 2010 Minimum 650, Goal 700
Resources - Kaplan Premiere, MGMAT Guides 1-8, OG12, Quant & Verbal

Please help me towards my goal of GMATclub tests and press +1 (kudos) if you like my posts.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 22

Intern
Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 36

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 8

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2010, 14:58
BarneyStinson wrote:
In many surveys, American consumers have expressed a willingness to spend up to 10 percent more for products that are ecologically sound. Encouraged by such surveys, Bleach-O corporation promoted a new laundry detergent, Bleach-O Green, as safer for the environment. Bleach-O Green costs 5 percent more than typical detergents. After one year, Bleach-O Green had failed to capture a significant share of the detergent market and was withdrawn from sale.

Which of the following questions is LEAST likely to be relevant in determining the reasons for the failure of Bleach-O Green?

A) How effective as a detergent was Bleach-O Green?
B) How many other detergents on the market were promoted as safe for the environment?
C) How much more did Bleach-O Green cost to manufacture than ordinary detergents?
D) To what extend did consumers accept the validity of Bleach-O Green advertised and promoted to consumers?
E) How effectively was Bleach-O Green advertised and promoted to consumers?

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA after discussion.

A. Relevant choice. If the bleach was not working, it would not sell.
B. Also relevant choice, if the market was over-saturated with other "similar" products this could be the reason for failure.
C. Bingo. Cost of manufacture is irrelevant to market share in the current context.
D. Relevant, if consumers didn't think this was really a "green" product why would they pay the premium?
E. Relevant, similar to D. If consumers didn't know it existed...

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 8

Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Posts: 188

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2010, 20:30
IMO C

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2010, 03:08
D) To what extend did consumers accept the validity of Bleach-O Green advertised and promoted to consumers?

i would say the answer as D if consumers doesn't accept the Bleach-O then they wouldn't buy Bleach-O

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2010, 03:11
sorry the answer has to be C i ignored the least likely part in the question

the price is 5% higher which is less than 10% stated so cost is irrelevant here

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2010, 03:11
please post the OA and source

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 151

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2010, 02:20
100% C.

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 459

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2010, 21:18
It should be C.

_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2010
Posts: 277

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 23

Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Other)

### Show Tags

23 May 2011, 08:31
quote="BarneyStinson"]In many surveys, American consumers have expressed a willingness to spend up to 10 percent more for products that are ecologically sound. Encouraged by such surveys, Bleach-O corporation promoted a new laundry detergent, Bleach-O Green, as safer for the environment. Bleach-O Green costs 5 percent more than typical detergents. After one year, Bleach-O Green had failed to capture a significant share of the detergent market and was withdrawn from sale.

Which of the following questions is LEAST likely to be relevant in determining the reasons for the failure of Bleach-O Green?

A) How effective as a detergent was Bleach-O Green?
B) How many other detergents on the market were promoted as safe for the environment?
C) How much more did Bleach-O Green cost to manufacture than ordinary detergents?
D) To what extend did consumers accept the validity of Bleach-O Green advertised and promoted to consumers?
E) How effectively was Bleach-O Green advertised and promoted to consumers?

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA after discussion.

OA is C
The reason is already given- we have this mfg info in the text provided (though I missed at first but when re-read then got )
_________________

My GMAT Journey 540->680->730!

~ When the going gets tough, the Tough gets going!

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 23

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1285

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

24 May 2011, 04:20
crystal C it is.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 10

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1635

Kudos [?]: 1105 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs

### Show Tags

31 May 2011, 15:19
+1 C

it doesn't matter how much the new detergent costs inside the company; after all, it costs 5% more to the consumers.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1105 [0], given: 109

Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Posts: 174

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

31 May 2011, 18:06
Option C

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 10

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 440

Kudos [?]: 215 [0], given: 20

Location: Texas

### Show Tags

01 Jun 2011, 15:21
looks C to be least effective.

Kudos [?]: 215 [0], given: 20

Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 188

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

01 Jun 2011, 18:27
C is the only irrelevant item on the menu. since the cost of manufacturer was never a factor for the conclusion

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1

Manager
Status: Completed GMAT on 22 Nov 2011
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 159

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

03 Jun 2011, 01:09
Clearly, C

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 12

Re: Bleach-O   [#permalink] 03 Jun 2011, 01:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by