It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 23:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 409

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2007, 15:15
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (00:58) correct 52% (01:02) wrong based on 531 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand from the people in power that they have the right to practice their particular religion without restriction.

A) from the people in power that they have the right to practice
B) that the people in power give them the right of practicing
C) to have the right, from the ones in power, to practice
D) the right, from those in power, of practicing
E) from those in power the right to practice
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3345

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2007, 16:21
E is correct for me...

right to practice...demand from

are correct forms

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

Director
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 577

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Location: France

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2007, 02:11
was between A and B. think it is A coz idiom is "right to"

Believe E is wrong becaue to whom refers 'those'? to the minority in power?

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 915

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2007, 03:41
karlfurt wrote:
was between A and B. think it is A coz idiom is "right to"

Believe E is wrong becaue to whom refers 'those'? to the minority in power?

You make a good point. Also "demand that" is idiomatic.

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 387

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 0

Location: Boston, MA

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2007, 07:51
E.

"right to practice"

I think "that they have" in A is unnecessary.

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 734

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2007, 09:06
A. Demand â€¦that they have the right?
B. Changes the meaning.
C. May be.
D. Need â€˜forâ€™
E. Demand from those in power TO HAVE the right to practiceâ€¦

I boiled it down to C & E. I feel that E had something missing. So, I pick C.

Can you guys explain what are your reason(s) to eliminate C?

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 726

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 4

Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2007, 11:10
one more E guys.

In A, pronoun reference for "they" is not clear.

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 409

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2007, 14:06
In B I think 'demand that' is the correct idiom, it makes the sentence subjunctive. This is used correctly in B, but there is a problem with the use of 'right of practicing' ........'right to practice' should be used.
E corrects this error, but what 'those' refers to in E?

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2007
Posts: 65

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: D.C.

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2007, 15:45
between B and E...

Still like B, even though "practicing" seems out of place, I think it functions as a participle and is okay in the sentence.

Can anyone break B and E down any more and explain the grammer behind them. Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 363

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 3

Schools: Kellogg School of Management

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2007, 09:49
A) from the people in power that they have the right to practice

not clear what 'they' refers to

B) that the people in power give them the right of practicing

right of practicing not the correct idiom

C) to have the right, from the ones in power, to practice

demand the or demand that is better than demand to

D) the right, from those in power, of practicing

same issue as B

E) from those in power the right to practice

Concise and correct

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 3

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 363

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 3

Schools: Kellogg School of Management

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2007, 09:52
gmacvik wrote:
In B I think 'demand that' is the correct idiom, it makes the sentence subjunctive. This is used correctly in B, but there is a problem with the use of 'right of practicing' ........'right to practice' should be used.
E corrects this error, but what 'those' refers to in E?

i think those refers to the groups in power (minority groups demand from those in power) since those should be parallel to the minority groups.... but i'm not 100% clear about this as well... E though not ideal seemed to be the best of the lot

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2012
Posts: 24

Kudos [?]: 70 [1], given: 33

Concentration: Strategy
Schools: Bocconi '15 (A)
In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2013, 10:41
1
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand from the people in power that they have the right to practice their particular religion without restriction.

A.from the people in power that they have the right to practice

B.that the people in power give them the right of practicing

C.to have the right, from the ones in power, to practice

D.the right, from those in power, of practicing

E.from those in power the right to practice

Kudos [?]: 70 [1], given: 33

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4491

Kudos [?]: 8757 [2], given: 105

Re: In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand fr [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2013, 12:13
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
rajatr wrote:
In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand from the people in power that they have the right to practice their particular religion without restriction.
A. from the people in power that they have the right to practice
B. that the people in power give them the right of practicing
C. to have the right, from the ones in power, to practice
D. the right, from those in power, of practicing
E. from those in power the right to practice

Dear rajatr,
I'm happy to help with this. This is a good question.

The prompt is a pronoun trainwreck ---- "that they have" --- the pronoun "they" is supposed to refer to the "minority groups", but it's closer to "the people in power" --- tension between what the grammar implies and what the intended meaning is. (A) is out.

The correct idiom is "right to practice" --- the wording "right of practicing" is awkward and unidiomatic --- (B) & (D) are out.

Since the whole end of the sentence, after the underlined phrase, describes modifies the right for which the minorities are asking, it is more elegant to have the "from" preposition right after the verb, rather than have it come between the "right" and the clause that modifiers this noun. (C) has this problem, and (C) is just a flaccid wordy nightmare of an answer.

(E) is sleek and elegant. It is grammatically correct, and finds a remarkably direct and concise way to express the idea. (E) is by far the best answer here.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Last edited by mikemcgarry on 17 Apr 2013, 18:33, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 8757 [2], given: 105

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1126

Kudos [?]: 3553 [0], given: 123

Location: United States
Re: In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2013, 18:08
IMO: E

In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand from the people in power that they have the right to practice their particular religion without restriction.

A.from the people in power that they have the right to practice
Wrong. "They" is not clear, we may understand that "they" is "the people"

B.that the people in power give them the right of practicing
Wrong. "the right of practicing" is not good, it should be "the right to practice"

C.to have the right, from the ones in power, to practice
Wrong. "demand to have" is incorrect idiom.

D.the right, from those in power, of practicing
Wrong. "of practicing" is wrong.

E.from those in power the right to practice
I picked E because E is the best, however I'm not convinced by E because the right idiom should be "demand something from someone". But in this question the idiom is "demand from someone something".

_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3553 [0], given: 123

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4491

Kudos [?]: 8757 [1], given: 105

Re: In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2013, 18:43
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
pqhai wrote:
E.from those in power the right to practice
I picked E because E is the best, however I'm not convinced by E because the right idiom should be "demand something from someone". But in this question the idiom is "demand from someone something".

Dear pqhai,
In this idiom, use of the preposition "from" is crucial to the idiom --- for example, the idiom would be incorrectly constructed with another preposition. But word order is not crucial. The placement of a prepositional phrase in a sentence often has some wiggle room. Admittedly, it might sound awkward if the order were just changed for no reason whatsoever (e.g. "The child demands from his mother attention." Hmmm. Awkward.) Here, though, we have a compelling reason. The structure "demand something from someone" would be inappropriate because the "something" is a noun, the right, with a long modifier, to practice their particular religion without restriction. It would make no sense to have the structure

demand something [long long long long modifier] from someone

This sentence, simply in moving the preposition for a good reason (a perfectly legal move), works around this problem:

demand from someone something [long long long long modifier]

This is an elegant solution.

Does this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8757 [1], given: 105

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1126

Kudos [?]: 3553 [0], given: 123

Location: United States
Re: In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2013, 19:13
mikemcgarry wrote:
pqhai wrote:
E.from those in power the right to practice
I picked E because E is the best, however I'm not convinced by E because the right idiom should be "demand something from someone". But in this question the idiom is "demand from someone something".

Dear pqhai,
In this idiom, use of the preposition "from" is crucial to the idiom --- for example, the idiom would be incorrectly constructed with another preposition. But word order is not crucial. The placement of a prepositional phrase in a sentence often has some wiggle room. Admittedly, it might sound awkward if the order were just changed for no reason whatsoever (e.g. "The child demands from his mother attention." Hmmm. Awkward.) Here, though, we have a compelling reason. The structure "demand something from someone" would be inappropriate because the "something" is a noun, the right, with a long modifier, to practice their particular religion without restriction. It would make no sense to have the structure

demand something [long long long long modifier] from someone

This sentence, simply in moving the preposition for a good reason (a perfectly legal move), works around this problem:

demand from someone something [long long long long modifier]

This is an elegant solution.

Does this make sense?
Mike

@Mike.
Thanks so much. You're genius!!! I got your point.
Regards.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3553 [0], given: 123

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4491

Kudos [?]: 8757 [0], given: 105

Re: In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2013, 09:48
pqhai wrote:
@Mike.
Thanks so much. You're genius!!! I got your point.
Regards.

Thank you for your kind words. I'm glad I could be of help.
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8757 [0], given: 105

Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 173

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 83

Schools: LBS '18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE: Design (Transportation)
In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2014, 09:00
mikemcgarry wrote:
pqhai wrote:
E.from those in power the right to practice
I picked E because E is the best, however I'm not convinced by E because the right idiom should be "demand something from someone". But in this question the idiom is "demand from someone something".

Dear pqhai,
In this idiom, use of the preposition "from" is crucial to the idiom --- for example, the idiom would be incorrectly constructed with another preposition. But word order is not crucial. The placement of a prepositional phrase in a sentence often has some wiggle room. Admittedly, it might sound awkward if the order were just changed for no reason whatsoever (e.g. "The child demands from his mother attention." Hmmm. Awkward.) Here, though, we have a compelling reason. The structure "demand something from someone" would be inappropriate because the "something" is a noun, the right, with a long modifier, to practice their particular religion without restriction. It would make no sense to have the structure

demand something [long long long long modifier] from someone

This sentence, simply in moving the preposition for a good reason (a perfectly legal move), works around this problem:

demand from someone something [long long long long modifier]

This is an elegant solution.

Does this make sense?
Mike

Mike,

'Those' is a demonstrative pronoun. So doesn't it have to have an antecedent? I ruled out E because of the usage of 'those'. It cannot refer back to either the 'social systems' or the 'minority groups'.

My inability to judge on issues like these always costs me a lot. I'm never able to figure out there subtleties in the GMAT SC questions, because of which i'm always struggling to get questions right.

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 83

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4491

Kudos [?]: 8757 [1], given: 105

Re: In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2014, 11:36
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
gauravkaushik8591 wrote:
Mike,

'Those' is a demonstrative pronoun. So doesn't it have to have an antecedent? I ruled out E because of the usage of 'those'. It cannot refer back to either the 'social systems' or the 'minority groups'.

My inability to judge on issues like these always costs me a lot. I'm never able to figure out there subtleties in the GMAT SC questions, because of which i'm always struggling to get questions right.

Dear gauravkaushik8591,
My friend, I am happy to respond. With all due respect, your thinking is too black & white. Of course demonstrative pronouns have antecedents. ALL pronouns have antecedents: otherwise, we wouldn't know to what they refer!! Here's the important distinction: demonstrative pronouns have a different relationship with their antecedents than do personal pronouns.
Personal pronouns are ABSOLUTE IDENTICAL to their antecedents. The "him" or "her" or "it" or "them" later in a sentence must be the identical self-same person or group mentioned earlier in the sentence.
Demonstrative pronouns allow for more flexibility, and can accommodate what we might call a relationship by analogy. A demonstrative pronoun does not have to refer to the exact same thing: it could refer to a different item or set with an analogous role to one mentioned earlier in the sentence.
Thus, this sentence is logically incorrect:
The fence around my house is higher than it is around Kevin's house.
That sentence is a trainwreck. Obviously, the same fence is not around both my house and Kevin's house. We are obviously trying to compare two different fences, but the personal pronoun forces us to identify the second fence with the first: grammar in full defiance of logic! This is precisely why we need a demonstrative pronoun:
The fence around my house is higher than that around Kevin's house.
That's perfectly correct. The pronoun "that" has an antecedent in the word "fence." The word "that" refers to a fence, but not the SAME fence. It refers to another fence, a second fence, the one that is in the analogous position around Kevin's house. All this allows for the proper comparison of two different fences.

Now, here is (E), the OA of this sentence:
In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand from those in power the right to practice their particular religion without restriction.
This one is very tricky. The sentence mentions "minority groups" in a "social system" -- by implication, we are talking about "some people in a social system." The "those" curiously has "minority groups" as an antecedent, not referring to those exact people, but referring by analogy to other people in the same social system, namely, those people in the same social system that wield power. Think about it: for any given minority group, we would know exactly to whom the "those" refers, even though these exact people have not been mentioned explicitly at all. That is the magic of demonstrative pronouns.

The pronoun-antecedent relationship for personal pronouns is extremely clear and easy to understand. It's much more subtle for demonstrative pronouns, and involves sophisticated analogical thinking. Do not fall into the trap of thinking that the relationship personal pronouns have with their antecedents is the only relationship that any pronoun can have with its antecedent. Do not fall into the trap of thinking that grammar is black & white like mathematics: it's much more subtle, involving the full capacities of the human mind for implication, imagination, and creativity. If a human being can think an idea, then there's a way to say it in a grammatically correct manner: that's how much grammar has to encompass.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8757 [1], given: 105

Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 70

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 38

Re: In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2015, 04:27
mikemcgarry wrote:
gauravkaushik8591 wrote:
Mike,

'Those' is a demonstrative pronoun. So doesn't it have to have an antecedent? I ruled out E because of the usage of 'those'. It cannot refer back to either the 'social systems' or the 'minority groups'.

My inability to judge on issues like these always costs me a lot. I'm never able to figure out there subtleties in the GMAT SC questions, because of which i'm always struggling to get questions right.

Dear gauravkaushik8591,
My friend, I am happy to respond. With all due respect, your thinking is too black & white. Of course demonstrative pronouns have antecedents. ALL pronouns have antecedents: otherwise, we wouldn't know to what they refer!! Here's the important distinction: demonstrative pronouns have a different relationship with their antecedents than do personal pronouns.
Personal pronouns are ABSOLUTE IDENTICAL to their antecedents. The "him" or "her" or "it" or "them" later in a sentence must be the identical self-same person or group mentioned earlier in the sentence.
Demonstrative pronouns allow for more flexibility, and can accommodate what we might call a relationship by analogy. A demonstrative pronoun does not have to refer to the exact same thing: it could refer to a different item or set with an analogous role to one mentioned earlier in the sentence.
Thus, this sentence is logically incorrect:
The fence around my house is higher than it is around Kevin's house.
That sentence is a trainwreck. Obviously, the same fence is not around both my house and Kevin's house. We are obviously trying to compare two different fences, but the personal pronoun forces us to identify the second fence with the first: grammar in full defiance of logic! This is precisely why we need a demonstrative pronoun:
The fence around my house is higher than that around Kevin's house.
That's perfectly correct. The pronoun "that" has an antecedent in the word "fence." The word "that" refers to a fence, but not the SAME fence. It refers to another fence, a second fence, the one that is in the analogous position around Kevin's house. All this allows for the proper comparison of two different fences.

Now, here is (E), the OA of this sentence:
In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand from those in power the right to practice their particular religion without restriction.
This one is very tricky. The sentence mentions "minority groups" in a "social system" -- by implication, we are talking about "some people in a social system." The "those" curiously has "minority groups" as an antecedent, not referring to those exact people, but referring by analogy to other people in the same social system, namely, those people in the same social system that wield power. Think about it: for any given minority group, we would know exactly to whom the "those" refers, even though these exact people have not been mentioned explicitly at all. That is the magic of demonstrative pronouns.

The pronoun-antecedent relationship for personal pronouns is extremely clear and easy to understand. It's much more subtle for demonstrative pronouns, and involves sophisticated analogical thinking. Do not fall into the trap of thinking that the relationship personal pronouns have with their antecedents is the only relationship that any pronoun can have with its antecedent. Do not fall into the trap of thinking that grammar is black & white like mathematics: it's much more subtle, involving the full capacities of the human mind for implication, imagination, and creativity. If a human being can think an idea, then there's a way to say it in a grammatically correct manner: that's how much grammar has to encompass.

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Mike I thought " Demand" always requires a subjunctive hence I chose B.Does that mean that " Demand " like many other verbs can take both the infinitive and subjunctive.Does " Demand " fall in the same category as "ask" , " Beg", "Require", urge etc etc , these can take both the subjunctive and the infinitive. Can you assist? Thanks.

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 38

Re: In most social systems, minority groups eventually demand   [#permalink] 08 Dec 2015, 04:27

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 30 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by