Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 May 2017, 11:04

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In North America there has been an explosion of public

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 329
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 766 [5] , given: 136

In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 May 2012, 06:16
5
KUDOS
20
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

40% (02:20) correct 60% (01:27) wrong based on 1004 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of,opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America, 45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years.

The reasoning above assumes which one of the following?

(A) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.
(B) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.
(C) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.
(D) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.
(E) The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

If you have any questions
New!
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7368
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2281

Kudos [?]: 15071 [14] , given: 224

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 May 2012, 10:56
14
KUDOS
Expert's post
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
imhimanshu wrote:
In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of,opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America,45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years.

The reasoning above assumes which one of the following?

a) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.

b) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.

c) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.

d) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.

e) The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

Can someone provide a reasoning over choice E

You have to focus on the conclusion.
Conclusion: Over the last 30 years, there has been an explosion of interest in Opera.

What does that mean? It means that the interest has increased manifold in the last 30 yrs (focus on the word 'increased')

How does the author support his argument? By saying that out of the current 70 opera companies, 45 were founded in the last 30 yrs i.e. much more than half were found in the last 30 yrs.
What is the assumption? 50 opera companies did not shut shop in the last 30 yrs i.e. more than 45 companies did not close down. You need your assumption to be true for the conclusion to be true. If 50 companies had shut down in the past 30 yrs, we can't say that opera is gaining a following.

Think about it: You say, "Popularity of pizza is increasing every day. Every week, one new pizza place opens up in my neighborhood."
What is your assumption? That 2 pizza places do not shut down everyday in your neighborhood. It that were the case, then we cannot say that pizza is becoming more popular.

You don't need option (E) to be true for the conclusion to be true. Say, even if all 45 were not established as a result of enthusiasm (say, only 40 were established as a result of enthusiasm), even then it is possible that interest in opera has increased. You don't need (E) to be true to prove the conclusion. Hence it is not an assumption.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Senior Manager Joined: 07 Sep 2010 Posts: 329 Followers: 9 Kudos [?]: 766 [0], given: 136 Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink] Show Tags 15 May 2012, 18:31 Thanks Karishma for the explanation.. VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: imhimanshu wrote: In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of,opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America,45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years. The reasoning above assumes which one of the following? a) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options. b) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years. c) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts. d) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades. e) The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience. Can someone provide a reasoning over choice E You have to focus on the conclusion. Conclusion: Over the last 30 years, there has been an explosion of interest in Opera. What does that mean? It means that the interest has increased manifold in the last 30 yrs (focus on the word 'increased') How does the author support his argument? By saying that out of the current 70 opera companies, 45 were founded in the last 30 yrs i.e. much more than half were found in the last 30 yrs. What is the assumption? 50 opera companies did not shut shop in the last 30 yrs i.e. more than 45 companies did not close down. You need your assumption to be true for the conclusion to be true. If 50 companies had shut down in the past 30 yrs, we can't say that opera is gaining a following. Think about it: You say, "Popularity of pizza is increasing every day. Every week, one new pizza place opens up in my neighborhood." What is your assumption? That 2 pizza places do not shut down everyday in your neighborhood. It that were the case, then we cannot say that pizza is becoming more popular. You don't need option (E) to be true for the conclusion to be true. Say, even if all 45 were not established as a result of enthusiasm (say, only 40 were established as a result of enthusiasm), even then it is possible that interest in opera has increased. You don't need (E) to be true to prove the conclusion. Hence it is not an assumption. _________________ +1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests Intern Joined: 19 Feb 2012 Posts: 25 Location: India Concentration: Technology, General Management Schools: WBS '15 GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38 GPA: 3.36 WE: Analyst (Computer Software) Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 7 Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink] Show Tags 15 May 2012, 23:19 so everything here is based on the conclusion Manager Joined: 28 May 2011 Posts: 193 Location: United States Concentration: General Management, International Business GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38 GPA: 3.6 WE: Project Management (Computer Software) Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 7 Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink] Show Tags 19 May 2012, 04:07 A good one... I also went for E. Above explanation makes me come back to B. _________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-guide-to-the-official-guide-13-for-gmat-review-134210.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Intern Joined: 08 Nov 2009 Posts: 44 Location: New York, NY Schools: Columbia, NYU, Wharton, UCLA, Berkeley WE 1: 2 Yrs mgmt consulting WE 2: 2 yrs m&a Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1 Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink] Show Tags 19 May 2012, 09:58 I read somewhere that there is an assumption negation technique. Can I use that here? Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7368 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2281 Kudos [?]: 15071 [2] , given: 224 Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink] Show Tags 20 May 2012, 00:57 2 This post received KUDOS Expert's post meatdumpling wrote: I read somewhere that there is an assumption negation technique. Can I use that here? You might have read about it in Veritas CR book. Assumption is a necessary missing premise. It is necessary for the conclusion to be true. Assumption negation technique considers the options one by one. You negate the option and see whether your conclusion can still hold. If it can, it means the option is not an assumption (because assumption is a premise that SHOULD be true for the conclusion to be true) You do not use this technique on all the options. Say, two options are looking good. Use it only on those two (it takes some time so you would be using too much time to answer the question if you use it on every option) Your assumption here is " There were [highlight]fewer than 45[/highlight] professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years." Negate it " There were [highlight]more than 45[/highlight] professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years." Can you still say there has been an explosion of interest in the last 30 yrs? 45 new companies were founded in the last 30 yrs but more than 45 (or equal to 45, doesn't matter) closed down. Now your conclusion cannot be true; hence, this option is the assumption. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 197
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 22

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 May 2012, 02:47
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
meatdumpling wrote:
I read somewhere that there is an assumption negation technique. Can I use that here?

You might have read about it in Veritas CR book. Assumption is a necessary missing premise. It is necessary for the conclusion to be true. Assumption negation technique considers the options one by one. You negate the option and see whether your conclusion can still hold. If it can, it means the option is not an assumption (because assumption is a premise that SHOULD be true for the conclusion to be true)

You do not use this technique on all the options. Say, two options are looking good. Use it only on those two (it takes some time so you would be using too much time to answer the question if you use it on every option)

Your assumption here is " There were [highlight]fewer than 45[/highlight] professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years."

Negate it " There were [highlight]more than 45[/highlight] professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years."

Can you still say there has been an explosion of interest in the last 30 yrs?
45 new companies were founded in the last 30 yrs but more than 45 (or equal to 45, doesn't matter) closed down. Now your conclusion cannot be true; hence, this option is the assumption.

Thank you Karishma. Your explanation is extremely helpful in understanding the concept.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 329
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 766 [0], given: 136

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 May 2012, 06:14
Thanks Karishma for explaining the ANT.
I understand the above explanation given for ANT. I have read in the Veritas CR book that after Negate the choice in such a manner that newly created choice should be logically opposite of the original choice.

I tried this ANT for choice E.
Original Choice -
The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

As per me, after applying ANT, choice E becomes,
The 45 most recently founded companies were NOT all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
However, as per your below explanation, the ANT should be focusing on the number 45, not on verb = were established.
Can you discuss this in detail. I understand the below quoted reasoning, nonetheless.

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
You don't need option (E) to be true for the conclusion to be true. Say, even if all 45 were not established as a result of enthusiasm (say, only 40 were established as a result of enthusiasm), even then it is possible that interest in opera has increased. You don't need (E) to be true to prove the conclusion. Hence it is not an assumption.

_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7368
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2281

Kudos [?]: 15071 [0], given: 224

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 May 2012, 09:11
imhimanshu wrote:
Thanks Karishma for explaining the ANT.
I understand the above explanation given for ANT. I have read in the Veritas CR book that after Negate the choice in such a manner that newly created choice should be logically opposite of the original choice.

I tried this ANT for choice E.
Original Choice -
The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

As per me, after applying ANT, choice E becomes,
The 45 most recently founded companies were NOT all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
However, as per your below explanation, the ANT should be focusing on the number 45, not on verb = were established.
Can you discuss this in detail. I understand the below quoted reasoning, nonetheless.

Your negation is correct. You have negated the 45 as well. "All" stands for the 45 companies. "were not all" (it means not all 45) established as a result of enthusiasm...

I could have negated the correct option as
"There were not fewer than 45 ..." which is awkward. So instead, I made it "more than (or equal to) 45"
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 331
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 228 [0], given: 33

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 May 2012, 04:25
chose B as the answer. It took some time. i eliminated A C D because they were off the scope. between E & B, B seemed a stronger assumption. Also E had the phrase all 45 which was a little extreme. Had the answer option some of the 45.. then it would have been a real tough one.
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 331
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 228 [0], given: 33

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 May 2012, 04:28
on second thoughts, i think if there was the modified option E as stated above it would have been a tie between B&E. Any ideas on this guys?
Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 19

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 May 2012, 04:06
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
imhimanshu wrote:
Thanks Karishma for explaining the ANT.
I understand the above explanation given for ANT. I have read in the Veritas CR book that after Negate the choice in such a manner that newly created choice should be logically opposite of the original choice.

I tried this ANT for choice E.
Original Choice -
The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

As per me, after applying ANT, choice E becomes,
The 45 most recently founded companies were NOT all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
However, as per your below explanation, the ANT should be focusing on the number 45, not on verb = were established.
Can you discuss this in detail. I understand the below quoted reasoning, nonetheless.

Your negation is correct. You have negated the 45 as well. "All" stands for the 45 companies. "were not all" (it means not all 45) established as a result of enthusiasm...

I could have negated the correct option as
"There were not fewer than 45 ..." which is awkward. So instead, I made it "more than (or equal to) 45"

hello karishma, excellent explanation. I was stuck between B and E.

I, however, eliminated E by the extreme word all. My resoning for the same is below.

The 45 most recently founded companies were NOT all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

This statement implies that not all but few companies established as a result of increased enthusiasm on the part of audience. This statement in fact supports the argument rather than weakning the same.
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 886
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 656 [0], given: 44

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 00:43
imhimanshu wrote:
In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of,opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America,45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years.

The reasoning above assumes which one of the following?

a) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.

b) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.

c) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.

d) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.

e) The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

Can someone provide a reasoning over choice E

Conclusion: There has been an explosion of public interest in opera over the last 30 years. Evidence: 70 professional opera companies currently active in NA, 45 were found over 30 years.

Negate choice B: there were MORE THAN (or EQUAL TO) 45 opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years. With this negated statement, over than half of opera ceased operation during the last 30 years will be against the argument.

In choice E, the 45 most recently founded companies were NOT all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience. => This negated statement does not affect anything to the argument because this answer choice talk about the enthusiasm, not the opera, which is the center of the conclusion.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 268
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 6

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 03:55
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
imhimanshu wrote:
In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of,opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America,45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years.

The reasoning above assumes which one of the following?

a) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.

b) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.

c) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.

d) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.

e) The 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.

Can someone provide a reasoning over choice E

The giveaway word is ALL. If E were framed in this way "SOME of the 45 most recently founded companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience" that response would be a stronger contender for a correct assumption than E is.

Negating B, the correct answer, basically rips the argument because it would imply that having 70 active professional opera companies is nothing spectacular or historic and thus cannot be used an indicator of a recent boom in operatic interest.
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 251 [0], given: 29

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 22:58
Karishma/OldFritz

d) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.

how did you eliminate option D

if I negate D it will look like

The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has decreased over the past three decades.

This weakens the conclusion that there has been a explosion of interest
Manager
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 209
Location: New Delhi, India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 12

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jun 2012, 10:13
Thanks Karishma for the great explanation... nice question
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3158
Followers: 854

Kudos [?]: 7279 [1] , given: 1063

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Mar 2013, 16:34
1
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In North America there has been an explosion of public interest in, and enjoyment of, opera over the last three decades. The evidence of this explosion is that of the 70 or so professional opera companies currently active in North America, 45 were founded over the course of the last 30 years.

The reasoning above assumes which one of the following?

(A) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.
(B) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.
(C) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.
(D) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.
(E) The 45 most recently founded opera companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 25
Concentration: Entrepreneurship
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 5

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Mar 2013, 16:46
E seems to be be the solid choice here
VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1122
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 190

Kudos [?]: 2097 [1] , given: 219

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Mar 2013, 16:48
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
IMO B

(A) All of the 70 professional opera companies are commercially viable options.
The argument doesn't mention the "commericial" aspect, this adds informations and the conclusion cannot be based on added information in the answer.
(B) There were fewer than 45 professional opera companies that had been active 30 years ago and that ceased operations during the last 30 years.
Correct (IMO)
(C) There has not been a corresponding increase in the number of professional companies devoted to other performing arts.
This is a good one... but since the passage doesn't mention any other art, I discard this and pick B.
(D) The size of the average audience at performances by professional opera companies has increased over the past three decades.
This option mention the "average", not the "number". Moreover the text links the increase of the number of bands to the explosion of public interest, and does not say anything about the audience.
(E) The 45 most recently founded opera companies were all established as a result of enthusiasm on the part of a potential audience.
The word "all" makes this answer too extreme
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Re: In North America there has been an explosion of public   [#permalink] 28 Mar 2013, 16:48

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 45 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Veritas - In North America there has been... 0 05 Aug 2014, 11:06
15 In New York there has been an explosion of public interest 7 09 Jan 2016, 13:02
4 In New York there has been an explosion of public interest 4 25 Feb 2017, 22:26
In North America there has been an explosion of public 0 12 Aug 2016, 04:03
11 The public in the United States has in the past been 6 10 Aug 2016, 06:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by