Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 02:29

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 318
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 993 [4] , given: 18

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2012, 03:47
4
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (02:35) correct 37% (01:39) wrong based on 617 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by walker on 28 May 2013, 08:53, edited 1 time in total.
Edited OA
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 318
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 993 [0], given: 18

Re: GWd #15 V 38 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2012, 04:06
The OA of this question has been very controversial, C vs E.
I initially picked C, but after reading the question again and looking at other people's opinions, I changed my mind into E.

My understanding is like this. feel free to point out flaws.

Q: What misleads the voters to think that the petition is extended from the local ordinances?

C doesn't have anything that could mislead the voters. It is just a prediction that the state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances.

On the other hands,
at the end of the passage, the author says that the petitions advocates a saes law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
And E says that the state law doesn't change the non-smoking places determined by the local ordinances.
Combining those two above, the state law bans smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices while the state law doesn't change non-smoking places determined by the local ordiances.
This might make the voters to think that the petition is extended from the local ordinances.

I am not sure if I explained clearly. It's so hard to explain sth complicated in English, which is not my first language.
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 137
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.33
WE: Information Technology (Retail)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 67 [1] , given: 11

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2012, 12:02
1
KUDOS
Please stay away from resources floating around the internet .

The OA to the above given question is C .

It's from the GMAT prep.

Thanks,
Ankit
_________________

You want something, go get it . Period !

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10367
Followers: 996

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 0

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2014, 19:21
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 26 May 2013
Posts: 65
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 243

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2014, 08:25
eybrj2 wrote:
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

What circumstances would misled readers assuming that the petition if approved would make the whole city anti-smoking zone (or extend the purview of the anti-smoking law). "C" highlights the the voters' concern saying that the new law would supersede the existing one, leading to stronger bans.
Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 219
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 150 [3] , given: 148

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2014, 15:32
3
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
eybrj2 wrote:
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

C. If local antismoking ordinances currently contains stronger bans than the state law does, signing for the petition will actually make the local banning smoking weaker, because local law is replaced by state law. Voters who sign for the petition will want to have stronger local banning smoking ordinances. So C, if exists, actually mislead the voters.
_________________

.........................................................................
+1 Kudos please, if you like my post

Manager
Status: How easy it is?
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 121
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Other)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 174

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2014, 02:24
This is a very good GMAT Prep question. Can experts please break the problem and explain the reasoning behind the question and procedure to find the correct answer?
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10367
Followers: 996

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 0

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2015, 03:39
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Current Student
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 939
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 141

Kudos [?]: 950 [0], given: 547

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2016, 12:58
Top Contributor
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances. A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Purpose of the petition : is to make smoking illegal in public offices.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?

A. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
Out of scope as we are not discussing insurance premiums

B. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
This petition still serves its purpose

C. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
This option makes the petition meaning less - Correct

D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
This makes the petition relevant

E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
This statement talks about a subset of the application of the petition. This is the next best answer.
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961

Intern
Joined: 29 May 2015
Posts: 17
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 52

Re: In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2017, 04:48
my understanding of the stimulus is not very clear.
Does the petition genuinely support statewide smoking restriction?Are the workers describing it accurately?
If yes how the voters can be misled?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3040
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 511

Kudos [?]: 2252 [1] , given: 22

In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2017, 08:01
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
rulez161 wrote:
my understanding of the stimulus is not very clear.
Does the petition genuinely support statewide smoking restriction?Are the workers describing it accurately?
If yes how the voters can be misled?

Does the petition genuinely support statewide smoking restriction?
The petition is for restricting smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Are the workers describing it accurately?
The workers ask ONLY the following question: “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” It is not clarified what is meant by "statewide smoking restriction", i.e, the scope of restricted places (retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public) is not clear in the campaign.

Therefore if the existing local laws are more stringent (i.e. smoking is banned in more places, in addition to retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public), then implementation of the state law would be misleading because it would supersede the local laws, thereby making the smoking norms more lenient.
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking   [#permalink] 03 Jan 2017, 08:01
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking 8 28 Mar 2016, 10:27
2 One state adds a 7 percent sales tax to the price of most 8 21 Nov 2013, 12:16
6 One year ago a local government initiated an antismoking 21 08 Mar 2017, 08:18
11 One state adds a 7 percent sales tax to the price of most 9 02 Sep 2016, 05:08
4 In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking 8 18 Jun 2015, 23:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by