It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 18:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 685

Kudos [?]: 604 [1], given: 0

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2008, 22:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
yeah C is clearly contradicting.. cannot be the answer..
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Kudos [?]: 604 [1], given: 0

Intern
Affiliations: Beta Gamma Sigma
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 2

Location: New York
WE 1: Intern - Morgan Stanley Tax
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2010, 07:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
D is not possible because it contradicts the prompt.

The prompt says "moderate rainfall (more than one inch, but no more than two inches)".

D says that the total number of incheas with moderate rainfall was more than twice what it had been. Since moderate rainfall, as defined in the prompt, is more than one but less than two, it isn't possible for this answer to work.

Thus, A is the answer.

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 173

Kudos [?]: 50 [1], given: 20

Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2010, 12:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
Is this CR question or a PS question?

Kudos [?]: 50 [1], given: 20

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 11 Dec 2012
Posts: 313

Kudos [?]: 295 [1], given: 66

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2013, 09:38
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy rainfall (more than two inches), moderate rainfall (more than one inch, but no more than two inches), light rainfall (at least a trace, but no more than one inch), or no rainfall. In 1990, there were fewer days with light rainfall than in 1910 and fewer with moderate rainfall, yet total rainfall for the year was 20 percent higher in 1990 than in 1910.

If the statements above are true, then it is also possible that in Patton City

(A) the number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1990 than in 1910
(B) the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was the same in 1990 as in 1910
(C) the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910
(D) the total number of inches of rain that fell on days with moderate rainfall in 1990 was more than twice what it had been in 1910
(E) the average amount of rainfall per month was lower in 1990 than in 1910

I actually think this is a great question. It highlights the logic that the GMAT is looking for, and of course the trickery they're known for. They also often put verbal understanding in quant questions and math understanding in verbal questions. This is such a question. If the total rainfall was higher in 1990 than 1910, you figure there were more rainiy days in 1990, but that doesn't have to be true. All the rain could have fallen on one day (at the logical extreme) and then had 364 days of clear skies. If you understand that this is possible, then you realize that A is possible. There were 5 days of 10+ inch torrential rain in 1990, and 15 days of 2 inch downpour in 1910. More days in 1910, but more rain in 1990.

The other answer choices can be eliminated by the question stem (B, C and E) or by basic math (D). Days with moderate rainfall are between 1 and 2 inches, so at a minimum value 1.00. If they double, they will no longer count as moderate rainfall days and instead move up to heavy. The biggest difference you can have was 1.00 in 1910 and 1.99 in 1990. This will never get to double the rainfall. A is the only possibility, although it is counter-intuitive. This type of reasoning is helpful in math as well, particularly in stats when you realize that average is the most misleading characteristic of them all.

Hope this helps!
-Ron
_________________

Kudos [?]: 295 [1], given: 66

Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2013
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 17

GMAT Date: 10-08-2013
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2013, 01:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
NO option is logically correct... but, i will go with D

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 17

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7676

Kudos [?]: 17381 [1], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2014, 20:17
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Shalabh18 wrote:
If the number of days of light, moderate & heavy rainfall are all lower in 1990, then how could the total rainfall be more?

Still not convinced with A

If in the first week it rains for one day and in the second week it rains for two days, can you conclude that it rained more in the second week? What if the one day of the first week was a full day of heavy downpour and the two days of the second week just saw light 5 minute showers each? Number of days is just one aspect. The amount of rainfall that fell on each day is another.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17381 [1], given: 232

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4482

Kudos [?]: 17046 [1], given: 1963

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2014, 16:09
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
New Project - Reviving the hardest questions on GMAT Club. Kudos for every reply with an explanation in the first 24 hours!

In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy rainfall (more than two inches), moderate rainfall (more than one inch, but no more than two inches), light rainfall (at least a trace, but no more than one inch), or no rainfall. In 1990, there were fewer days with light rainfall than in 1910 and fewer with moderate rainfall, yet total rainfall for the year was 20 percent higher in 1990 than in 1910.

If the statements above are true, then it is also possible that in Patton City

(A) the number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1990 than in 1910

(B) the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was the same in 1990 as in 1910

(C) the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910

(D) the total number of inches of rain that fell on days with moderate rainfall in 1990 was more than twice what it had been in 1910

(E) the average amount of rainfall per month was lower in 1990 than in 1910
_________________

Kudos [?]: 17046 [1], given: 1963

Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2014
Posts: 130

Kudos [?]: 77 [1], given: 36

Location: Hong Kong
Schools: Mannheim
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2014, 00:03
1
This post received
KUDOS
correct answer should be (E):

(E) the average amount of rainfall per month was lower in 1990 than in 1910

average amount of rainfall per month is likely to be lower in 1990 than in 1910, as only heavy rain seems to be the reason for the total rainfall being more than in 1910

--> there were some month in 1990 with a lot of heavy rainfall

Kudos [?]: 77 [1], given: 36

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7676

Kudos [?]: 17381 [1], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2015, 01:11
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
narendran1990 wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma: I can perfectly understand the logic you gave for option B. But I don't understand how C is incorrect.!! If rainfall was 20% higher in 1990 and given that LR+MR (1990)<LR+MR(1910) then I am left with only one assumption that HR has to be higher in 1990.!! I do understand your explanation for option A. But I need more clarity.

C. the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910

The days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches are LR days and MR days. So (C) says
LR Days + MR Days (1990) > LR Days + MR Days (1910)

But from our analysis of the argument, we already know that
LR Days + MR Days (1990) < LR Days + MR Days (1910)

Hence (C) is not possible.

As for (A), it is based on the logic that more days of rainfall does not mean more rainfall (inches). The intensity of rainfall can be higher over fewer days and hence fewer days could result in more rainfall.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17381 [1], given: 232

Intern
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2008, 13:34
how is 'c' possible

The stem says there are fewer days of light and moderate rain in 1990
option C directly contradicts what is written in the stem cos it essentially says that 1990 got more number of light and moderate rain days , which is false

IMO the best choice is D ....

lets say 1990 got fewer no of days for moderate + light rain but on days when it got it , the rains were closest to 2 inches
whereas in 1910 u got more number of such days , but its possible each day u got it closer to the lower end of the slab which is around one

So only D sounds possible to me

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 05 Jun 2008
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2008, 18:22
D.

The question is "COULD" be possible.

As mentioned above, C cannot be possible because its contradicting the evidence.

In short: The evidence leaves out heavy rain days from 1990.

This is possible:
Heavy rain fell on many of the moderate rain days.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 1632

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

Location: Southern California
Schools: Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2008, 20:42
D here
_________________

Check out the new Career Forum
http://gmatclub.com/forum/133

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 65

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 0

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2008, 00:57
OA is A

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 239

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2008, 12:58
D for me...we need to account for the increase in 1990...I dont see how A can account for the increase by 20% given the conditions.

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Affiliations: ACA, CPA
Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Posts: 433

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 41

Location: Vagabond
Schools: BC
WE 1: Big4, Audit
WE 2: Banking
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2010, 05:51
Wow..real sneaky!! Missed it completely.
_________________

If you have made mistakes, there is always another chance for you. You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 41

Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 7

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2010, 06:10
I narrowed down to A and D. Both seem correct. Please explain why D is not OA.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 7

Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 7

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2010, 10:17
Thanks KevinMMcAleer and TallJTinChina for the explanation.
Really a tough one.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 7

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1476

Kudos [?]: 760 [0], given: 6

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2010, 13:20
good explanation by heyitsaakash. i now see how A is correct.

Kudos [?]: 760 [0], given: 6

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1439

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2010, 22:40
Well A is right - and unless by some divine intervention - because picking A is anything but intuitive - one were to just "get" it somehow - eliminating the other choices is a royal pain

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2010, 04:54
Is there any error with answer A? According to my logic, it should be "The number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1910 than in 1900

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy   [#permalink] 05 Nov 2010, 04:54

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7    Next  [ 121 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.