sarvesh93sah
Hi,
I chose B since I felt that the choice B questions the causality. I am not
convinced with choice B but I gave in as I was running out of time
I have one doubt regarding choice E.
My question is that the choice E says that the price of alternative materials has decreased considerably but it does not give any info on the comparative price between asbestos and alternate material.
What if the price of alternate material is very higher than the price of asbestos even after the drop? We don't have an answer to this question. If the price is higher then choice E is not the reason for the switch. If the price is lesser then choice E is the reason for the switch. I eliminated E on this reasoning.
can anyone say what I did wrong?
hi sarvesh, Your reasoning is correct on your part to eliminate choice E considering cost of asbestos. But your thinking to eliminate on point of cost if wrong. Conclusion says that asbestos might have been reduced due to media news . Here we don't need to take into account or target cost factor but weaken assumtion that Asbestos is not reduced because of media factor but because of some OTHER FACTOR or something else have already made companies consume less Asbestos.
Choice E says that there are some material which have become cheaper , so this is factor which has led to reduce Asbestos. Choice is clearly saying its cheaper though not drawing clear comparison " cheaper than asbestos " , it bit understood.
Hope this helps
Cheers !