GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Sep 2018, 06:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In responding to the charges against the company’s skin cream,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2016
Posts: 102
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
GPA: 2.81
In responding to the charges against the company’s skin cream,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2018, 08:51
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

75% (01:11) correct 25% (01:23) wrong based on 69 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In responding to the charges against the company’s skin cream, a SkinBright spokesperson stated that any reactions caused by its products would develop within the first week of starting to use the product, and since the person who has filed the charges did not see any visible reaction for more than three weeks, it is not possible for the reaction to have been caused by SkinBright cream.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the spokesperson's conclusion above?

A. The reactions caused by the Trilet lotion, a competitor of SkinBright, look exactly the same as the reactions caused by SkinBright creams.

B. The person filing the charges has not used any beauty product other than SkinBright cream in the past three weeks.

C. SkinBright products are one of the few dermatologically tested products and are unlikely to cause any skin reactions.

D. In some cases the inner layers of the skin might react to the product, and the subsequent rash may take time to become visible to the naked eye.

E. Most people using SkinBright are happy with the product and have never had any reactions.

_________________

Resources
GMATNinja Webinars
GMATNinja Chats

Quant
Mixtures

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6787
Re: In responding to the charges against the company’s skin cream,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2018, 20:03
PeepalTree wrote:
In responding to the charges against the company’s skin cream, a SkinBright spokesperson stated that any reactions caused by its products would develop within the first week of starting to use the product, and since the person who has filed the charges did not see any visible reaction for more than three weeks, it is not possible for the reaction to have been caused by SkinBright cream.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the spokesperson's conclusion above?

A. The reactions caused by the Trilet lotion, a competitor of SkinBright, look exactly the same as the reactions caused by SkinBright creams.

B. The person filing the charges has not used any beauty product other than SkinBright cream in the past three weeks.

C. SkinBright products are one of the few dermatologically tested products and are unlikely to cause any skin reactions.

D. In some cases the inner layers of the skin might react to the product, and the subsequent rash may take time to become visible to the naked eye.

E. Most people using SkinBright are happy with the product and have never had any reactions.

Company S claims reaction to come in first week itself and MR A reporting the rashes after 3 weeks suggests it was not from S..
Something to weaken??

The flaw is connecting reactions and visible reactions as same..

Choice D says the same..

D
_________________

1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effects-of-arithmetic-operations-on-fractions-269413.html

GMAT online Tutor

Intern
Joined: 24 Apr 2018
Posts: 1
Re: In responding to the charges against the company’s skin cream,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2018, 21:27
chetan2u wrote:
PeepalTree wrote:
In responding to the charges against the company’s skin cream, a SkinBright spokesperson stated that any reactions caused by its products would develop within the first week of starting to use the product, and since the person who has filed the charges did not see any visible reaction for more than three weeks, it is not possible for the reaction to have been caused by SkinBright cream.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the spokesperson's conclusion above?

A. The reactions caused by the Trilet lotion, a competitor of SkinBright, look exactly the same as the reactions caused by SkinBright creams.

B. The person filing the charges has not used any beauty product other than SkinBright cream in the past three weeks.

C. SkinBright products are one of the few dermatologically tested products and are unlikely to cause any skin reactions.

D. In some cases the inner layers of the skin might react to the product, and the subsequent rash may take time to become visible to the naked eye.

E. Most people using SkinBright are happy with the product and have never had any reactions.

Company S claims reaction to come in first week itself and MR A reporting the rashes after 3 weeks suggests it was not from S..
Something to weaken??

The flaw is connecting reactions and visible reactions as same..

Choice D says the same..

D

thanks,
I have came up with 'D' and 'B'. 'D' is strong, but why not 'B'?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6787
Re: In responding to the charges against the company’s skin cream,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2018, 21:44
chetan2u wrote:
PeepalTree wrote:
In responding to the charges against the company’s skin cream, a SkinBright spokesperson stated that any reactions caused by its products would develop within the first week of starting to use the product, and since the person who has filed the charges did not see any visible reaction for more than three weeks, it is not possible for the reaction to have been caused by SkinBright cream.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the spokesperson's conclusion above?

A. The reactions caused by the Trilet lotion, a competitor of SkinBright, look exactly the same as the reactions caused by SkinBright creams.

B. The person filing the charges has not used any beauty product other than SkinBright cream in the past three weeks.

C. SkinBright products are one of the few dermatologically tested products and are unlikely to cause any skin reactions.

D. In some cases the inner layers of the skin might react to the product, and the subsequent rash may take time to become visible to the naked eye.

E. Most people using SkinBright are happy with the product and have never had any reactions.

Company S claims reaction to come in first week itself and MR A reporting the rashes after 3 weeks suggests it was not from S..
Something to weaken??

The flaw is connecting reactions and visible reactions as same..

Choice D says the same..

D

thanks,
I have came up with 'D' and 'B'. 'D' is strong, but why not 'B'?

The conclusion has to do with symptoms/reactions in three weeks.

Had the conclusion been that ...
Although the reactions are from a cream but not our cream, then this would have been OK.
_________________

1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effects-of-arithmetic-operations-on-fractions-269413.html

GMAT online Tutor

Re: In responding to the charges against the company’s skin cream, &nbs [#permalink] 09 Sep 2018, 21:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.