Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 May 2017, 13:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 242
Location: Italy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2006, 02:03
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division. When the program began in 1994, the division's hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer's program has not met its goal are false.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet
division has not increased significantly since 1994.

B. At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had been produced in 1994.

C. Since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division.

D. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.

E. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.
_________________

â€œIf money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

Intern
Joined: 21 May 2005
Posts: 20
Location: Los Angles
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Jet division [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2006, 03:26
Ans is E.
Director
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 572
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2006, 06:04
AgreE
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5221
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 404 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2006, 06:20
Prephrased the assumption and scanned down to (E).

:45
SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1730
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 01:35
What about B?

B also presents a strong assumption.
After all its the production of passenger jets that produce the waste. If the division produced less passenger jets that in 1994 the amount of waste produced will also be less.

E is also a strong assumption.
VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1121
Location: India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 01:45
I'll also go with E.
Since it is directly mentioned in the passage that 'waste output was 90 pounds per production worker '. This makes E a strong assumption when compared to B.
Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 69
Location: Hyderabad, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 03:15
It is E
_________________

Hema

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1404
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 10:11
when I see a question like this I need to assume that whatever the parameters were in the beginning of comparison, should be the same at the end... I was looking exactly for clarification of number of workers and found it in E
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2898
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 289 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 11:11
Easy E.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Intern
Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 1
Location: South Korea
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

not easy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jul 2006, 02:47

This is not easy question. I think B is correct. E is a trap. The article already said that the mazardous waste reduced to 40 pounds per production worker. therefore, it is already stated in the article that the number of production worker is the same both in 1994 and last year.

why B? Please refer to the reply above. someone explained it.
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 112
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 12:57
E it is.
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 402
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 15:17
Tough choice between B and E... I think I will go with B finally..since the total waste output needs to be cut in half(as per the goal) and not per worker...
Director
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 791
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 15:20
The argument is about the total hazardous waste generated by the airline manufacturer. The stat given as proof of reduction is waste per prodn worker.

Now, number of airplanes produced does not depend on nbr of workers. Neither do we have any stats regarding waste generated per plane. Hence B is very clearly out.

Assume there were 50 workers in 1994, and 110 last year - calculate total waste generated. Answer is evident. E.
_________________

Uh uh. I know what you're thinking. "Is the answer A, B, C, D or E?" Well to tell you the truth in all this excitement I kinda lost track myself. But you've gotta ask yourself one question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya, punk?

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1404
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 18:33
hey Gauss, what's the OA?
SVP
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2303
Schools: Darden
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 475 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2006, 15:12
E was exactly the answer I imagined when I read the question.
31 Jul 2006, 15:12
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Airplane manufacturer 1 10 Jul 2009, 05:55
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane 8 02 May 2008, 14:12
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane 8 22 Dec 2007, 08:48
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane 18 05 Sep 2007, 12:23
Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a 4 02 Jul 2007, 05:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.