It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 12:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In several cities, the government is going ahead with

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

In several cities, the government is going ahead with [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2006, 08:02
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government’s requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.
(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.
(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government’s requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.
(D) The government’s construction projects would not, on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.
(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2006, 08:18
Negate (E) and the central argument crumbles.

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 230

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2006, 09:37
tied up in D or E.

One of them seems to be an inference rather than an assumption.

I usually find it difficult to differentiate the thin line between inference and assumption. Hopefully I 'm not doing it this time.. Crossing my fingers and selecting D.

I feel it connects the evidence with the conclusion.

Evidence: vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed

Conclusion:
Government is not guilty of fiscal wastefulness.

The conclusion is made based on the assumption that whatever the govt constructs will meet the requirements of the facility and not turn out to be another candidate for leasing.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2006, 11:50
The OA is given is given as A...i chose D though...Can anyone please explain this...

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2006, 12:42
Tough One

I went for E initally.

But after seeing the OA I need someone explain this

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2006, 12:50
Even i went for (E) initially.I think we all have assumed that new construction implies building new office spaces but in the context of the OA the ambitious construction is revamp of the facilities.Thus revamping the office space to suit the req's of the government is a more cost-ffective solution than leasing.The new construction in (A) also refers to revamp of the facilities.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2006, 22:18
Negate A and argument falls apart.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 19 Aug 2006, 22:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In several cities, the government is going ahead with

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.