In several cities, the government is going ahead with : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Feb 2017, 09:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In several cities, the government is going ahead with

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1092
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 502 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2007, 10:10
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.

(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.

(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government's requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.

(D) The government's construction projects would not, on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.

(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2007, 10:25
marcodonzelli wrote:
In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.

(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.

(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government's requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.

(D) The government's construction projects would not, on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.

(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.

Between B & E

E is a strong statement hence I would go for 'B'
VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1092
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 502 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2007, 10:37
OA is A
Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2007, 10:55
marcodonzelli wrote:
OA is A

Expected . My success rate in certain type of CRs is worse than expected...

What is your take? do u agree with the OA...
Intern
Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2007, 12:20
marcodonzelli wrote:
In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction. -Correct answer. This helps support Government
(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective. -No info related to costs
(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government's requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance. -This weakens the Goverment move.

(D) The government's construction projects would not, on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned. -This contradicts the premise.
(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.-This just explains that Government looks at other option. But in A it is stated that Govt looked at the existing space and found that it was not economical

Go with A
Re: cr..please very careful explanation of eache alternative   [#permalink] 28 Dec 2007, 12:20
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 Inference Revision: Government restrictions have severely limited 5 14 Feb 2015, 01:56
20 In several cities, the government is going ahead with 28 21 Jan 2013, 14:44
3 In several cities, the government is going ahead with 7 02 Oct 2012, 09:23
3 Government restrictions have severely limited the amount of 35 28 Apr 2012, 18:50
5 In several cities, the government is going ahead with 19 02 Apr 2010, 05:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by