Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 25 May 2017, 00:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In several cities, the government is going ahead with

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1082
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 0

In several cities, the government is going ahead with [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2007, 11:10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?



(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.

(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.

(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government's requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.

(D) The government's construction projects would not, on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.

(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 635
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Re: cr..please very careful explanation of eache alternative [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2007, 11:25
marcodonzelli wrote:
In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?



(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.

(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.

(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government's requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.

(D) The government's construction projects would not, on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.

(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.


Between B & E

E is a strong statement hence I would go for 'B'
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1082
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 0

Re: cr..please very careful explanation of eache alternative [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2007, 11:37
OA is A
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 635
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Re: cr..please very careful explanation of eache alternative [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2007, 11:55
marcodonzelli wrote:
OA is A


Expected :oops: . My success rate in certain type of CRs is worse than expected...

What is your take? do u agree with the OA...
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: cr..please very careful explanation of eache alternative [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2007, 13:20
marcodonzelli wrote:
In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?



(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction. -Correct answer. This helps support Government
(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective. -No info related to costs
(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government's requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance. -This weakens the Goverment move.

(D) The government's construction projects would not, on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned. -This contradicts the premise.
(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.-This just explains that Government looks at other option. But in A it is stated that Govt looked at the existing space and found that it was not economical


Go with A
Re: cr..please very careful explanation of eache alternative   [#permalink] 28 Dec 2007, 13:20
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
No horse finished ahead of Cold Molasses, and no horse ritula 11 03 Dec 2008, 14:52
1 No horse finished ahead of Cold Molasses, and no horse jahnaviyeruva 9 07 Oct 2008, 07:48
1 The city government should invest surplus funds in improving aaron22197 16 12 Sep 2011, 20:00
Experts publish their posts in the topic Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead az780 7 13 Feb 2008, 12:37
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving iamba 14 18 Jul 2007, 17:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In several cities, the government is going ahead with

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.