It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 23:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangkok
In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2007, 08:11
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

82% (00:37) correct 18% (00:44) wrong based on 394 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just large enough to satisfy domestic demand. Teruvia’s total rice acreage will not be expanded in the foreseeable future, nor will rice yields per acre increase appreciably. Teruvia’s population, however, will be increasing significantly for years to come. Clearly, therefore, Teruvia will soon have to begin importing rice.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) No pronounced trend of decreasing per capita demand for rice is imminent in Teruvia.
(B) Not all of the acreage in Teruvia currently planted with rice is well suited to the cultivation of rice.
(C) None of the strains of rice grown in Teruvia are exceptionally high-yielding.
(D) There are no populated regions in Teruvia in which the population will not increase.
(E) There are no major crops other than rice for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 166

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2007, 08:30
A

Author is arguing that as the population increases, and no increased production of rice is planned, Teruvia will have to import rice. He is assuming that the demand for rice wont go down, pretty much.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2007, 08:46
Agree (A) assuming that the increasing population will prefer rice as its food (and no alternative).

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 177

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2007, 16:09
I will go with A as well.
_________________

Regards

Subhen

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 56

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2007, 23:10
jet1445 wrote:
Q21:
In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just large enough to satisfy domestic demand. Teruvia’s total rice acreage will not be expanded in the foreseeable future, nor will rice yields per acre increase appreciably. Teruvia’s population, however, will be increasing significantly for years to come. Clearly, therefore, Teruvia will soon have to begin importing rice.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. No pronounced trend of decreasing per capita demand for rice is imminent in Teruvia.
B. Not all of the acreage in Teruvia currently planted with rice is well suited to the cultivation of rice.
C. None of the strains of rice grown in Teruvia are exceptionally high-yielding.
D. There are no populated regions in Teruvia in which the population will not increase.
E. There are no major crops other than rice for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.

i dont think its A bcoz it is not necessary per capita demand should decrease to import rice. I think its E

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 324 [1], given: 7

WE 1: 4 years in IT
In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2010, 11:25
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just large enough to satisfy domestic demand. Teruvia’s total rice acreage will not be expanded in the foreseeable future, nor will rice yields per acre increase appreciably. Teruvia’s population, however, will be increasing significantly for years to come. Clearly, therefore, Teruvia will soon
have to begin importing rice.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. No pronounced trend of decreasing per capita demand for rice is imminent in Teruvia.
B. Not all of the acreage in Teruvia currently planted with rice is well suited to the cultivation of rice.
C. None of the strains of rice grown in Teruvia are exceptionally high-yielding.
D. There are no populated regions in Teruvia in which the population will not increase.
E. There are no major crops other than rice for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.

Question
[Reveal] Spoiler:
Whats wrong in B

Kudos [?]: 324 [1], given: 7

Current Student
Status: Three Down.
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1914

Kudos [?]: 2227 [3], given: 210

Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2010, 17:05
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
We are told that presently the rice production is just enough to satisfy the need. We are told that rice production trends will not change, but population will increase.

We are hence assuming that the amount of rice demanded by the people will remain the same, and hence increase with increase in population.

Options C, D and E are irrelevant. So let's just look at A and B.

A says that there is no downward trend in demand for rice, which means that demand for rice is constant, which is consistent with our observation. Let's negate this. There is a decreasing per capita demand for rice. This weakens our argument. Hence A is correct.

But to look at B: This is talking about the acreage suited for the production of rice. This situation already exists with the present trends. We are told that there won't be a change in rice production trends or increase in acreage. Hence this becomes immaterial to answer the question of whether rice demand stays the same in order to require imports.

raghavs wrote:
In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just large enough to satisfy
domestic demand. Teruvia’s total rice acreage will not be expanded in the foreseeable
future, nor will rice yields per acre increase appreciably. Teruvia’s population, however,
will be increasing significantly for years to come. Clearly, therefore, Teruvia will soon
have to begin importing rice.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. No pronounced trend of decreasing per capita demand for rice is imminent in
Teruvia.
B. Not all of the acreage in Teruvia currently planted with rice is well suited to the
cultivation of rice.
C. None of the strains of rice grown in Teruvia are exceptionally high-yielding.
D. There are no populated regions in Teruvia in which the population will not
increase.
E. There are no major crops other than rice for which domestic production and
domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.

Whats wrong in B

Kudos [?]: 2227 [3], given: 210

Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 223

Kudos [?]: 326 [0], given: 21

Location: India
WE 1: 6 Year, Telecom(GSM)
Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2010, 01:41
Though i got it right.Thanks to whiplash for explanation.

Kudos [?]: 326 [0], given: 21

Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2010
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2010, 02:04
picked C

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 5

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2010, 02:11
Straight A.

For Assumption questions, we assume that the information provided in the stimulus/arguments is all correct.
Moreover the Answer choice can be tested to be correct or not by using the Negate test.
On Negating A, i.e If the demand for price drops over a period of years then the Argument will not hold and hence A is right.
The same is not true for Option B.
_________________

Please give me kudos, if you like the above post.
Thanks.

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 5

Intern
Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 32

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2011, 11:57
only a makes sense.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 15

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2011, 18:00
jet1445 wrote:
Q21:
In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just large enough to satisfy domestic demand. Teruvia’s total rice acreage will not be expanded in the foreseeable future, nor will rice yields per acre increase appreciably. Teruvia’s population, however, will be increasing significantly for years to come. Clearly, therefore, Teruvia will soon have to begin importing rice.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. No pronounced trend of decreasing per capita demand for rice is imminent in Teruvia.
B. Not all of the acreage in Teruvia currently planted with rice is well suited to the cultivation of rice.
C. None of the strains of rice grown in Teruvia are exceptionally high-yielding.
D. There are no populated regions in Teruvia in which the population will not increase.
E. There are no major crops other than rice for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 15

Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2011
Posts: 182

Kudos [?]: 57 [1], given: 21

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2011, 22:55
1
KUDOS
yup +1 for A...

Kudos [?]: 57 [1], given: 21

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 303

Kudos [?]: 1261 [2], given: 2

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2012, 14:47
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
The prompt says that the amount of rice is enough to sustain the current populations demand. Let's, for the sake of argument, say that the population, per capita, eats 100 grains of rice per year. If the number of total rice grains produced is fixed, then the only way that the country will not meet its rice demand is if the per capita consumption remains the same.

If per capita consumption falls to 50, and the population only increase by 20% then clearly Teruvia will not have to import rice. Only answer choice (A) address this issue. If we negate (A), we get:

A pronounced...decrease per capita......which, as I pointed out, shows that the conclusion - Teruvia will have to import - is invalid.

Hope that helps .
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Kudos [?]: 1261 [2], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Posts: 191

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 8

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2012, 06:46
The answer choices A and E are close. As it is a assumption question if we negate A stands out. So A is the correct answer.
_________________

_________________
Giving +1 kudos is a better way of saying 'Thank You'.

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 8

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10130

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2014, 16:25
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 899

Kudos [?]: 911 [0], given: 322

Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2014, 11:55
Hi e-gmat,

Just wanted to know whether my reasoning is correct on this one.

Premise:

Currently, Domestic supply=Domestic Demand.

Supply of rice won't increase appreciably to meet increased demand in case the demand increases.

Population will be increasing.

Conclusion:

City will have to IMPORT rice.

Pre thinking assumption:

Population increase doesn't necessarily means that the DEMAND of RICE will increase and hence this is the GAP.

(a). A. No pronounced trend of decreasing per capita demand for rice is imminent in Teruvia.
In other words, DEMAND is unlikely to decrease by any chance and hence city has to import the rice.
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 911 [0], given: 322

Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 722

Kudos [?]: 865 [0], given: 724

Location: India
GPA: 3.21
Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2014, 09:10
raghavs wrote:
In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just large enough to satisfy
domestic demand. Teruvia’s total rice acreage will not be expanded in the foreseeable
future, nor will rice yields per acre increase appreciably. Teruvia’s population, however,
will be increasing significantly for years to come. Clearly, therefore, Teruvia will soon
have to begin importing rice.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. No pronounced trend of decreasing per capita demand for rice is imminent in
Teruvia.
B. Not all of the acreage in Teruvia currently planted with rice is well suited to the
cultivation of rice.
C. None of the strains of rice grown in Teruvia are exceptionally high-yielding.
D. There are no populated regions in Teruvia in which the population will not
increase.
E. There are no major crops other than rice for which domestic production and
domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.
Whats wrong in B

A is very strong contender and if you negate this choice, we destroy the conclusion
If we look at option C and negate it we get that some of the rice grown in Teruvia are exceptionally high yielding...which are in use and thus current demand are met...what if we use more of these strains...the demand may be met..but here we are heading in to assuming other things as well...So there are 2 levels assumed here...

Can we categorize this is as one of the ways an assumption question answer choice is put in
_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Kudos [?]: 865 [0], given: 724

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10130

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2017, 00:44
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just l   [#permalink] 30 Apr 2017, 00:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by