It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 11:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 258

Kudos [?]: 260 [0], given: 0

Location: California
In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jun 2007, 19:23
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

80% (02:43) correct 20% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many coastal American cities that the waterfront was an undesirable location for residential buildings. As a result, much of the waterfront in these cities was never developed aesthetically and instead was left to industry and commerce. Today, however, waterfront properties are generally seen as prestigious, as evidenced by the large sums paid for homes along the beach front. A developer who wishes to make a large profit would be wise to buy urban waterfront lots and erect residential buildings on them.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim made about urban waterfront properties?


People today have more money, relatively speaking, to spend on real estate than they did in previous centuries.

Homeowners will be willing to spend large sums on residential properties in traditionally industrial or commercial districts.

Many urban waterfront lots are available for purchase.

Many coastal American cities are encouraging developers to rehabilitate the waterfront through tax incentives.

Properties in interior residential districts in coastal American cities are significantly more expensive than those along the waterfront.

Kudos [?]: 260 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 376

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2007, 11:58
D provides the added incentive for developers

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Posts: 254

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2007, 12:04
B. It states that there is a demand for waterfront homes in industrial or commercial districts.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 213

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2007, 13:14
B
thought for D also....bur one sense its weakening the argument.
If tax incentives are given to the developer then it may be possibe that the land prices may decrease.
but again its all depends on developer if he wants just a fixed profit percentage from his investment. :-D

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 364

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2007, 13:43
B

if homeowners are willing to pay for such properties, developers are certain to make a profit as the statement claims

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 634

Kudos [?]: 647 [0], given: 6

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2007, 14:04
B.

1. Developer can make profit only if, homeowners buy those apartments.
2. Watrefont is now attractive for prestigious issue.

B states clearly whereas D never clears idea about homeowners.

Kudos [?]: 647 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 376

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2007, 10:32
B simply restates what is there in the stem without adding anything further to strengthen. Whats the OA

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 701

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2007, 11:34
dahcrap wrote:
B simply restates what is there in the stem without adding anything further to strengthen. Whats the OA


I vote for D.

The stem is about the developer or Home builder and how he makes profits...

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Posts: 254

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2007, 11:47
baski6 wrote:
dahcrap wrote:
B simply restates what is there in the stem without adding anything further to strengthen. Whats the OA


I vote for D.

The stem is about the developer or Home builder and how he makes profits...


While tax incentives would certainly help make greater profits, they are not a sufficient condition for profits. For example: what if there there was zero demand for the houses? Then even with the tax incentives there is no opportunity for profit. Demand for the houses is a necessary condition for profits, hence answer B.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 376

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2007, 16:54
Baer,

But the stem already says that ppl have a high demand for houses why repeat it to strengthen it

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 431

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2007, 04:05
I think it is B

If homeowners are willing to spend money on residential properities on the waterfront, then a developer whoerect residential buildings on waterfront might be successful.

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2007, 04:37
(D) weakens the argument, since less demand then more supply. (B) correctly follows the conlusion and is therefore the correct answer. cheers

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 46

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jun 2014, 03:24
What is the source of this question ? I find none of the option logical

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 46

Re: In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many   [#permalink] 17 Jun 2014, 03:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the 18th and 19th centuries, it was believed in many

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.